Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Nohup error
Operating Systems Solaris Nohup error Post 303002826 by jlliagre on Saturday 2nd of September 2017 05:20:38 PM
Old 09-02-2017
Beware that the non POSIX "disown" utility is not available to the OP who is running Solaris 10. "disown" is only implemented in Solaris 11.

In any case, "disown" is not required here, being redundant. The "nohup" call is already disconnecting the launched process from the running session so there is no reason to try to do it twice.
This User Gave Thanks to jlliagre For This Post:
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

error piping nohup to /dev/null

Hi, I have a script as follows: #!/bin/sh nohup ./my_program >& /dev/null & However, i get a "Generated or received a file descriptor number that is not valid" whenever I run it. running the command up in prompt is ok though. if i change the first line to #!/bin/csh i get a then:... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mochi
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Nohup

Hi, Using nohup it sends output automatically to $HOME/nohup.out - how do I direct this output to another named file instead, so I can run several scripts in the background at once, directing their outputs into individual log files? Cheers (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: miwinter
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Help on nohup

Hi I submitted a long running executable without using nohup. Now, is there any way I can assure to keep that process ON even if my session gets killed? Thanks Bobby (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: bobbyjohnz
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

nohup - help!

I find that if I use nohup (in bourne shell script) then all the interactive parts in my code are gone hidden... e.g., the places asking input from the user (such as ckyorn) will not be displayed. This is no good. Is there a way to use nohup (or similar utility) and meanwhile, to keep the... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: bluemoon1
9 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

nohup standerd error

hi, im using nohup command to execute one script. in the nohup.out im getting standerd output as well as standerd error in it. i want standerd output and error in nohup.out and only standerd error in error.txt file. im using command like following nohup sh test.sh 2>error.txt & ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: arvindng
5 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

When we need nohup

Hi, I've read the man page on nohup. But I still can't see what's the differences if we just send a process to background versus sending a nohup process to background. eg: myprocess & vs nohup myprocess & Without nohup, myprocess would still run uninterruptible at background... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ehchn1
2 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Error while running script using nohup

Hi, I am running the below script. When i run the script normally it executes fine but when i run the same script using nohup it throws an error as getStatus.sh: syntax error at line 3: `(' unexpected . Can you let me know why it is so? while do . $(dirname $0)/include.sh cd... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vignesh53
2 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

How get program name that produced an IO error redirected to a LOG in a nohup command?

Good afternoon, I'm have program that executes in background another programs. The main program would be programA and the programs executed by the main one, would be program1a, program1b and program1c. I need the programs to continue the execution no matter if the shell connection is lost,... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: enriquegm82
6 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Saving nohup output to a file other than nohup.out

Shell : bash OS : Oracle Linux 6.4 I want to save the ouput of a nohup command to file other than nohup.out . Below are my 3 attempts. For both Attempt1 and Attempt2 , the redirection logs the output correctly to the output file. But I get the error "ignoring input and redirecting stderr to... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: kraljic
7 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Error running a script in nohup mode

Hi, running this script in normal mode, no error occours #!/usr/bin/ksh VALUE=0 SUBJECT='sub' ADDRESSES="aaa@gmail.com" BODY='body' while true do COUNT=$(tail -2500 /log/file.log | grep -i "error" | wc -l) if ; then echo "$BODY" | mailx -s "$SUBJECT" "$ADDRESSES"... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: nash83
3 Replies
NICE(1) 						      General Commands Manual							   NICE(1)

NAME
nice, nohup - run a command at low priority (sh only) SYNOPSIS
nice [ -number ] command [ arguments ] nohup command [ arguments ] DESCRIPTION
Nice executes command with low scheduling priority. If the number argument is present, the priority is incremented (higher numbers mean lower priorities) by that amount up to a limit of 20. The default number is 10. The super-user may run commands with priority higher than normal by using a negative priority, e.g. `--10'. Nohup executes command immune to hangup and terminate signals from the controlling terminal. The priority is incremented by 5. Nohup should be invoked from the shell with `&' in order to prevent it from responding to interrupts by or stealing the input from the next per- son who logs in on the same terminal. FILES
nohup.out standard output and standard error file under nohup SEE ALSO
csh(1), setpriority(2), renice(8) DIAGNOSTICS
Nice returns the exit status of the subject command. BUGS
Nice and nohup are particular to sh(1). If you use csh(1), then commands executed with ``&'' are automatically immune to hangup signals while in the background. There is a builtin command nohup which provides immunity from terminate, but it does not redirect output to nohup.out. Nice is built into csh(1) with a slightly different syntax than described here. The form ``nice +10'' nices to positive nice, and ``nice -10'' can be used by the super-user to give a process more of the processor. 4th Berkeley Distribution May 8, 1986 NICE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy