08-06-2017
I put another hour or so into it. I changed the PATH so that gcc 2.95 was ahead of the SCO cc, and used gnu make instead of SCO and that eliminated the error with the |. However, a new problem appeared. It seems that the new version of Ghostscript requires a version of gcc newer than 2.95.
5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi all
I am using HPUX11.0
i want to install perl 5.6.0 and ghostscript 5.03..
can anyone help me to get it download from any free ftp or http link...
i searched perl.com and ghostscript.com but in vain....
the procuct are to be installed with the above mentioned version...
please... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Prafulla
1 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I need to know how to convert 132 columns text file to Postcript by using ghostscript. What I want to do is to fax a 132 columns
report (text file) with efax and I was told to use ghostscript to change the type and szie of font so the lines will not wrap.
Thanks ;) (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: falcon2460
1 Replies
3. HP-UX
Hi everyone,
I'm new here but I hope there's someone who can help me with this error when running ghostscript/gs:
/usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol: jpeg_resync_to_restart (code) from gs
Abort(coredump)
I've managed to install Ghostscript 8.56 including all dependencies successfully... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: bgail
0 Replies
4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I am trying to use Ghostscript oin AIX to print pdf's and it seems I have downloaded it and all dependencys fine - install went fine, when I type any gs commnad except gs -h it just hangs..Here is what it says before the hang:
GNU Ghostscript 5.50 (2000-2-13)
Copyright (C) 1998 Aladdin... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: capeme
6 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I am attempting to update to ghostscript version 8.54 on my SCO 5.0.7 box. When I run ./configure, I get the following error
configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH
Could someone please help me? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: kberger82
0 Replies
CFREE(3) Linux Programmer's Manual CFREE(3)
NAME
cfree - free allocated memory
SYNOPSIS
#include <stdlib.h>
/* In SunOS 4 */
int cfree(void *ptr);
/* In glibc or FreeBSD libcompat */
void cfree(void *ptr);
/* In SCO OpenServer */
void cfree(char *ptr, unsigned num, unsigned size);
/* In Solaris watchmalloc.so.1 */
void cfree(void *ptr, size_t nelem, size_t elsize);
Feature Test Macro Requirements for glibc (see feature_test_macros(7)):
cfree(): _BSD_SOURCE || _SVID_SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
This function should never be used. Use free(3) instead.
1-arg cfree
In glibc, the function cfree() is a synonym for free(3), "added for compatibility with SunOS".
Other systems have other functions with this name. The declaration is sometimes in <stdlib.h> and sometimes in <malloc.h>.
3-arg cfree
Some SCO and Solaris versions have malloc libraries with a 3-argument cfree(), apparently as an analog to calloc(3).
If you need it while porting something, add
#define cfree(p, n, s) free((p))
to your file.
A frequently asked question is "Can I use free(3) to free memory allocated with calloc(3), or do I need cfree()?" Answer: use free(3).
An SCO manual writes: "The cfree routine is provided for compliance to the iBCSe2 standard and simply calls free. The num and size argu-
ments to cfree are not used."
RETURN VALUE
The SunOS version of cfree() (which is a synonym for free(3)) returns 1 on success and 0 on failure. In case of error, errno is set to
EINVAL: the value of ptr was not a pointer to a block previously allocated by one of the routines in the malloc(3) family.
CONFORMING TO
The 3-argument version of cfree() as used by SCO conforms to the iBCSe2 standard: Intel386 Binary Compatibility Specification, Edition 2.
SEE ALSO
malloc(3)
COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.27 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can
be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
2007-07-26 CFREE(3)