08-19-2016
Hi,
some thoughts at the moment:
- I'm using opscode chef at the moment, because my chef advised me to do so. The learning curve is steep, but after I got it, it helped me a lot.
- I'm very fond of the extensible data discovery called "OHAI" available within chef. Every system is inventorized with a high grade of details and you can write data collection modules yourself. The data is available everywhere within chef and outside too, which is extremeley useful. You want a list of software packages from every machine? You want to search for a specific MAC address in your comany? You want an individual hardware report for all your machines? No problem. The data only waits to be searched.
- This configuration management adds a considerable extra amount of resource overhead to the machines if regularly executed or as an additional service that has to run.
- Personally I like the method to not use configuration management at all, but an approach to only use self created packages to reach the same goal: Nice video about an existing solution here: OSDC 2013 | Schlomo Schapiro: Configuration Management and Linux Packages (ENG) - YouTube
The piece of software behind the video is named YADT
- What I dislike about chef is, that the platform support is limited to current mainstream linux distributions, which causes some older legacy distributions can not be managed with chef. What I also disklike are things that some extension package handles things in other ways the os doing it. E. g. the solid mysql-chef-gem(Yes it's based on ruby). sets up a system that allows multiple instances of mysql at the same machine and so setup of the mysql packages and the setup of the mysql-chef-way interferes with each other. That's why I'm not using the good chef-mysql extensions and stick to my own "recipes" here.
Last edited by stomp; 08-19-2016 at 01:03 PM..
Reason: added YADT-URL
7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Debian
Is there a way to configure the gnome file manager to open each directory in the same window instead of opening a new one? (Debian 5.0.0) (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: snorkack59
5 Replies
2. Solaris
Can somebody kindly help me to determine which one i should choose to better manipulate OS volume.
RAID manager or veritas volume manager?
Any critical differences between those two?
Thanks in advance. (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: beginningDBA
5 Replies
3. Solaris
hi all
i am a newbie to solaris and i am doing some R&D in veritas volume manager. This is my first day with veritas. I downloaded and installed Veritas storage foundation 5.1 package in my sun solaris 5.10 sparc machine. When i try to create disk group in vxvm, it giving one error message. I am... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: kingston
6 Replies
4. Solaris
Hello,
There once was a disk. Veritas thought it wasn't happy, but it really was.
The disk was all alone on a plex. There was another plex, in the same volume, that was fine and happy with its own single disk.
I removed the plex with the unhappy disk. Then I went into vxdiskadm, removed... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kity1kity
2 Replies
5. Filesystems, Disks and Memory
In Sun manuals, I didn't find how to backup Sun StorageTek Common Array Manager's configuration. Is there a way to do it like backing up Brocade switch configuration? CAM is under Solaris 10.
Thank you in advance! (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: aixlover
0 Replies
6. Red Hat
HI,
I use red hat linux ES 5.
I start the virt-manager and add new guest host in it .
But When I choose parXXX-virtuXXXXX ...not full-virtXXXx...
I get below screen to fill
installtion source
Please indicate where installation media is available
for the operating system you would like to... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: chuikingman
1 Replies
7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hello Dears,
I am up to install configuration manager as the number of Linux systems are growing alot in my company.
can please advise any of them?
Puppet, spicewalk ansilble etc.. please share you opinion.
My aim is to have config manager to automate/provision systems and to have inventory... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Vit0_Corleone
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT XFREE86
dh_installwm
DH_INSTALLWM(1) Debhelper DH_INSTALLWM(1)
NAME
dh_installwm - register a window manager
SYNOPSIS
dh_installwm [debhelperoptions] [-n] [--priority=n] [wm...]
DESCRIPTION
dh_installwm is a debhelper program that is responsible for generating the postinst and prerm commands that register a window manager with
update-alternatives(8). The window manager's man page is also registered as a slave symlink (in v6 mode and up). It must be installed in
usr/share/man/man1/ in the package build directory prior to calling dh_installwm. In compat 9 and earlier, the manpage was optional.
FILES
debian/package.wm
List window manager programs to register.
OPTIONS
--priority=n
Set the priority of the window manager. Default is 20, which is too low for most window managers; see the Debian Policy document for
instructions on calculating the correct value.
-n, --no-scripts
Do not modify postinst/prerm scripts. Turns this command into a no-op.
wm ...
Window manager programs to register.
NOTES
Note that this command is not idempotent. dh_prep(1) should be called between invocations of this command. Otherwise, it may cause multiple
instances of the same text to be added to maintainer scripts.
SEE ALSO
debhelper(7)
This program is a part of debhelper.
AUTHOR
Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
11.1.6ubuntu2 2018-05-10 DH_INSTALLWM(1)