Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting High availability of a process between two Linux servers Post 302979162 by Mahesh_RPM on Wednesday 10th of August 2016 07:56:01 AM
Old 08-10-2016
any clues yet?
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

High availability/Load balancing

Hi folks, (Sorry I don't know what its technology is termed exactly. High Availability OR load balancing) What I'm going to explore is as follows:- For example, on Physical Servers; Server-1 - LAMP, a working server Server-2 - LAMP, for redundancy While Server-1 is working all... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: satimis
3 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

iscsi high availability

Hi, I want to set up a iscsi high availability with sheepdog distributed storage. Here is my system set up. Four nodes with sheepdog distributed storage and i am sharing this storage through iscsi using two nodes as well as using a virtual ip set up using ucarp.Two nodes using same iqn. And... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: jobycxa
0 Replies

3. AIX

AIX high availability 1-3/69

Hi, Can someone help and give the answer for the following questions: 1. When PowerHA SystemMirror 7.1 is installed on AIX 7.1, what RSCT component does Cluster Aware AIX (CAA) replace? A. Group Services B. Resource Manager C. Topology Services D. Resource Monitoring and Control... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: walterchang100
2 Replies

4. Solaris

High availability

hi guys I posted problem last time I didn't find answer to my issue. my problem is as below: I have two servers which work as an actif/standby in high availability system. but when i use command HASTAT -a i have the following message: couldn' find actif node. the servers are sun... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: zineb06
1 Replies

5. Red Hat

Redhat: High Availability

Hi, I want to create gfs storage. But getting error as below: --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: pacemaker-1.1.12-22.el7_1.2.x86_64 (rhel-ha-for-rhel-7-server-eus-rpms) Requires: sbd You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mzainal
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Email Server High Availability

Hello, We are planning to setup a Email server with High Availability for email services so that if SMTP/POP/IMAP goes down on one server, the services switch to second server. We are planning to use a Linux machines from a hosting provider and will do it using DNS with multiple MX records with... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: sunnysthakur
0 Replies
ACCESS(2)						      BSD System Calls Manual							 ACCESS(2)

NAME
access -- check access permissions of a file or pathname LIBRARY
Standard C Library (libc, -lc) SYNOPSIS
#include <unistd.h> int access(const char *path, int mode); DESCRIPTION
The access() function checks the accessibility of the file named by path for the access permissions indicated by mode. The value of mode is the bitwise inclusive OR of the access permissions to be checked (R_OK for read permission, W_OK for write permission and X_OK for exe- cute/search permission) or the existence test, F_OK. All components of the pathname path are checked for access permissions (including F_OK). The real user ID is used in place of the effective user ID and the real group access list (including the real group ID) are used in place of the effective ID for verifying permission. If a process has super-user privileges and indicates success for R_OK or W_OK, the file may not actually have read or write permission bits set. If a process has super-user privileges and indicates success for X_OK, at least one of the user, group, or other execute bits is set. (However, the file may still not be executable. See execve(2).) RETURN VALUES
If path cannot be found or if any of the desired access modes would not be granted, then a -1 value is returned; otherwise a 0 value is returned. ERRORS
Access to the file is denied if: [EACCES] Permission bits of the file mode do not permit the requested access, or search permission is denied on a component of the path prefix. The owner of a file has permission checked with respect to the ``owner'' read, write, and execute mode bits, members of the file's group other than the owner have permission checked with respect to the ``group'' mode bits, and all others have permissions checked with respect to the ``other'' mode bits. [EFAULT] path points outside the process's allocated address space. [EIO] An I/O error occurred while reading from or writing to the file system. [ELOOP] Too many symbolic links were encountered in translating the pathname. [ENAMETOOLONG] A component of a pathname exceeded {NAME_MAX} characters, or an entire path name exceeded {PATH_MAX} characters. [ENOENT] The named file does not exist. [ENOTDIR] A component of the path prefix is not a directory. [EROFS] Write access is requested for a file on a read-only file system. [ETXTBSY] Write access is requested for a pure procedure (shared text) file presently being executed. SEE ALSO
chmod(2), execve(2), stat(2), secure_path(3) STANDARDS
The access() function conforms to ISO/IEC 9945-1:1990 (``POSIX.1''). SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
The access() system call is a potential security hole due to race conditions. It should never be used. Set-user-ID and set-group-ID appli- cations should restore the effective user or group ID, and perform actions directly rather than use access() to simulate access checks for the real user or group ID. The access() system call may however have some value in providing clues to users as to whether certain operations make sense for a particular filesystem object. Arguably it also allows a cheaper file existence test than stat(2). BSD
May 3, 2010 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy