Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: One liners, quick rant...
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? One liners, quick rant... Post 302977435 by rbatte1 on Monday 18th of July 2016 06:45:03 AM
Old 07-18-2016
I've learned the hard way that compressing my code to the extreme just confuses myself when I need to change it. Do I really want 2 hours of extricating myself for a few extra lines of clear code that cost no noticeable time.

There is a case for a one-liner if you can get a tool such as awk to do several things at once rather than calling a loop with multiple greps or cuts being called within it. For me it comes down to using it for processing efficiency. Even if I can make my code fit into fewer blocks on disk, it's just not worth it. If I do, then it gets an explicit comment, often with example code it is logically replacing. If I can adjust it in future in a longer method, then conversion would be simpler if I get my requirements clearer first.

It's the same with debugging logs for batch programs - write lots of info to the log so that when there is a problem, the trace is there. Just make sure you clean up old logs after a short time to avoid running out of space. It's far better than trying to trace or reproduce an error, potentially altering your data for the worse on each attempt or having to put trace information in when an error occurs and you are bleary-eyed.



Robin
 

4 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Where can I rant?

First of all, apologies to the admins for not reading the rules totally and missing the bit about ranting off about other OSs. But that raises a question. Where do you go to have a good rant, to vent your disgust at various corporations and thier hideous behaviour? :confused: (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: u6ik
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk - one liners

Guys, I have a requirement like this. A file has >5K records always. Separated by "|", it has 30 fields for each line. In some lines, I am getting an odd field. say, the 15th field is supposed to be 2 characters but comes in as >2. In this case, for resolving this I need to copy the value of... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: PikK45
6 Replies

3. What is on Your Mind?

Those simple one liners

I wanted to say LOL and punch my face when I saw post#11 (where Don_Cragun even reduced the string manipulation with a simple regex) in the thread https://www.unix.com/shell-programming-scripting/220553-add-0-start-filename-2.html I mean, when things can be done with just a one liner, sometimes I... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: ahamed101
6 Replies

4. What is on Your Mind?

A rant...

Hi guys... (Apologies for any typos etc...) This is basically a rant. I have been doing kids level projects and writing code to suit since around 1982, for the uProfessor, for the Sinclair Spectrum and later for the QL, IBM-XT in MS-DOS and after that for a 386DX40 up to Windows 95, until I... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
3 Replies
XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder(3X)									      XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder(3X)

NAME
XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder - A Drag and Drop function that reorders a stack of widgets that are registered drop sites SYNOPSIS
#include <Xm/DragDrop.h> void XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder (widget, sibling, stack_mode) Widget widget; Widget sibling; Cardinal stack_mode; DESCRIPTION
XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder changes the stacking order of the drop site specified by widget. The stacking order controls the manner in which drag-under effects are clipped by overlapping siblings, regardless of whether they are active. The stack mode is relative either to the entire stack, or to another drop site within the stack. The stack order can be modified only if the drop sites are siblings in both the widget and drop site hierarchy, and the widget parent of the drop sites is registered as a composite drop site. Specifies the drop site to be restacked. Specifies a sibling drop site for stacking operations. If specified, then widget is restacked relative to this drop site's stack position. Specifies the new stack position for the specified widget. The values are XmABOVE and XmBELOW. If a sibling is specified, then widget is restacked as follows: The widget is placed just above the sibling. The widget is placed just below the sibling. If the sibling parameter is not specified, then widget is restacked as follows: The widget is placed at the top of the stack. The widget is placed at the bottom of the stack. For a complete definition of DropSite and its associated resources, see XmDropSite(3X). SEE ALSO
XmDropSite(3X), XmDropSiteRetrieve(3X), XmDropSiteQueryStackingOrder(3X) XmDropSiteConfigureStackingOrder(3X)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy