Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Relocation strings using awk/sed from a index file Post 302972761 by jypark22 on Tuesday 10th of May 2016 01:09:53 PM
Old 05-10-2016
Relocation strings using awk/sed from a index file

Hi All,

I'd always appreciate all helps from this website. I would like to relocate strings based on the index number from an index file.


Index numbers are shown on the first column in the index file (index.txt) and I would like to relocate "path" based on index numbers. Paths are placed in the same row if the index number is the same. For example, there are two zeros so path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_3826 is placed on the first row and path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_4349 is placed on the first row and next to path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_3826.

index.txt:

Code:
     0        path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_3826  str    DR     -         -
     0        path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_4349  stf    DR     -         -
     1        path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_2374  stf    DR     -         -
     1        path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_4011  stf    DR     -         -
     2        path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_3078  stf    DR     -         -

However, strings are written in another file (source.txt) and each "path" has four lines of strings.

source.txt:

Code:
    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_3826
    dtu_inst_d[14]
    dec_fcl_rdsr_sel_pc_d
    0.8664
    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_4349
    dtu_inst_d[18]
    dec_swl_rdsr_sel_thr_d
    0.795429
    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_2374
    dtu_inst_d[13]
    dec_dcl_cctype_d[2]
    0.938914
    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_4011
    dtu_inst_d[13]
    ifu_exu_useimm_d
    0.843643
    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_3078
    dtu_inst_d[12]
    ifu_exu_shiftop_d[2]
    0.915818

The desired output is:

Code:
    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_3826	    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_4349
    dtu_inst_d[14]	    dtu_inst_d[18]
    dec_fcl_rdsr_sel_pc_d	    dec_swl_rdsr_sel_thr_d
    0.8664	0.795429
    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_2374	    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_4011
    dtu_inst_d[13]	    dtu_inst_d[13]
    dec_dcl_cctype_d[2]	    ifu_exu_useimm_d
    0.938914	0.843643
    path_sparc_ifu_dec_in_3078	
    dtu_inst_d[12]	
    ifu_exu_shiftop_d[2]	
    0.915818

My idea is that (1)combining two files first and (2) relocate path info using the index number, but I don't know how to do this work. Probably, sed/awk is an appropriate language.

Any help is appreciated.

Best,

Jaeyoung
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

(awk) compare files in dir with an index file

Using awk I have an index file which has been seperated into 5 fields. The first field contains file names. What I need to do is check to see if a file exists in my current directory that is not in the first field of my index file. If its not i print out a message. Please help! (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: xthexonex
4 Replies

2. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

why the inode index of file system starts from 1 unlike array index(0)

why do inode indices starts from 1 unlike array indexes which starts from 0 its a question from "the design of unix operating system" of maurice j bach id be glad if i get to know the answer quickly :) (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: sairamdevotee
0 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Using awk/sed to extract text between Strings

Dear Unix Gurus, I've got a data file with a few hundred lines (see truncated sample)... BEGIN_SCAN1 TASK_NAME=LA48 PDD Profiles PROGRAM=ArrayScan 1.00 21.220E+00 2.00 21.280E+00 END_DATA END_SCAN1 BEGIN_SCAN2 TASK_NAME=LA48 PDD Profiles 194.00 2.1870E+00 ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: tintin72
5 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Replace Strings with sed or awk

Hello i need some help with the usage of sed. Situation : 2 textfiles, file.in , file.out In the first textfile which is called file.in are the words for the substitution. Every word is in a new-line like : Firstsub Secondsub Thridsub ... In the second textflie wich is called file.out is... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Kingbruce
5 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk extract certain digits from file with index substr

I would like to extract a digit from $0 starting 2,30 to 3,99 or 2.30 to 3.99 Can somebody fix this? awk --re-interval '{if($0 ~ /{1}{2}/) {print FILENAME, substr($0,index($0,/{1}{2}/) , 4)}}'input abcdefg sdlfkj 3,29 g. lasdfj alsdfjasl 2.86 gr. slkjds sldkd lskdjfsl sdfkj kdjlksj 3,34 g... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: sdf
4 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk or sed script to remove strings

Below am trying to separate FA-7A:1, In output file it should display 7A 1 Command am using Gives same output as below format: 22B7 10000000c9720873 0 22B7 10000000c95d5d8b 0 22BB 10000000c97843a2 0 22BB 10000000c975adbd 0 Not showing FA ports as required format... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: aix_admin_007
5 Replies

7. Programming

How to replace the complex strings from a file using sed or awk?

Dear All, I am having a requirement to find the difference between 2 files and generate a discrepancy report out of it as an html page. I prefer using diff -y file1 file2 since it gives user friendly layout to know any discrepancy in the record and unique records among the 2 file. Here's how it... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: Badhrish
12 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Relocation strings

Hi all, I would like to relocate strings based on the index number. Index numbers are shown on the first column, the strings are shown on the second column. 1 path_sparc_ifu_dec_104 1 path_sparc_ifu_dec_105 2 path_sparc_ifu_dec_63 2 ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jypark22
3 Replies

9. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Use strings from nth field from one file to match strings in entire line in another file, awk

I cannot seem to get what should be a simple awk one-liner to work correctly and cannot figure out why. I would like to use patterns from a specific field in one file as regex to search for matching strings in the entire line ($0) of another file. I would like to output the lines of File2 which... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jvoot
1 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Adding sequential index to duplicate strings

I have a text file in the following format >Homo sapiens KQKCLYNLPFKRNLEGCRERCSLVIQIPRCCKGYFGRDCQACPGGPDAPCNNRGVCLDQY SATGECKCNTGFNGTACEMCWPGRFGPDCLPCGCSDHGQCDDGITGSGQCLCETGWTGPS CDTQAVLPAVCTPPCSAHATCKENNTCECNLDYEGDGITCTVVDFCKQDNGGCAKVARCS... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jerrild
2 Replies
A2P(1)							 Perl Programmers Reference Guide						    A2P(1)

NAME
a2p - Awk to Perl translator SYNOPSIS
a2p [options] [filename] DESCRIPTION
A2p takes an awk script specified on the command line (or from standard input) and produces a comparable perl script on the standard out- put. OPTIONS Options include: -D<number> sets debugging flags. -F<character> tells a2p that this awk script is always invoked with this -F switch. -n<fieldlist> specifies the names of the input fields if input does not have to be split into an array. If you were translating an awk script that processes the password file, you might say: a2p -7 -nlogin.password.uid.gid.gcos.shell.home Any delimiter can be used to separate the field names. -<number> causes a2p to assume that input will always have that many fields. -o tells a2p to use old awk behavior. The only current differences are: * Old awk always has a line loop, even if there are no line actions, whereas new awk does not. * In old awk, sprintf is extremely greedy about its arguments. For example, given the statement print sprintf(some_args), extra_args; old awk considers extra_args to be arguments to "sprintf"; new awk considers them arguments to "print". "Considerations" A2p cannot do as good a job translating as a human would, but it usually does pretty well. There are some areas where you may want to examine the perl script produced and tweak it some. Here are some of them, in no particular order. There is an awk idiom of putting int() around a string expression to force numeric interpretation, even though the argument is always inte- ger anyway. This is generally unneeded in perl, but a2p can't tell if the argument is always going to be integer, so it leaves it in. You may wish to remove it. Perl differentiates numeric comparison from string comparison. Awk has one operator for both that decides at run time which comparison to do. A2p does not try to do a complete job of awk emulation at this point. Instead it guesses which one you want. It's almost always right, but it can be spoofed. All such guesses are marked with the comment ""#???"". You should go through and check them. You might want to run at least once with the -w switch to perl, which will warn you if you use == where you should have used eq. Perl does not attempt to emulate the behavior of awk in which nonexistent array elements spring into existence simply by being referenced. If somehow you are relying on this mechanism to create null entries for a subsequent for...in, they won't be there in perl. If a2p makes a split line that assigns to a list of variables that looks like (Fld1, Fld2, Fld3...) you may want to rerun a2p using the -n option mentioned above. This will let you name the fields throughout the script. If it splits to an array instead, the script is probably referring to the number of fields somewhere. The exit statement in awk doesn't necessarily exit; it goes to the END block if there is one. Awk scripts that do contortions within the END block to bypass the block under such circumstances can be simplified by removing the conditional in the END block and just exiting directly from the perl script. Perl has two kinds of array, numerically-indexed and associative. Perl associative arrays are called "hashes". Awk arrays are usually translated to hashes, but if you happen to know that the index is always going to be numeric you could change the {...} to [...]. Itera- tion over a hash is done using the keys() function, but iteration over an array is NOT. You might need to modify any loop that iterates over such an array. Awk starts by assuming OFMT has the value %.6g. Perl starts by assuming its equivalent, $#, to have the value %.20g. You'll want to set $# explicitly if you use the default value of OFMT. Near the top of the line loop will be the split operation that is implicit in the awk script. There are times when you can move this down past some conditionals that test the entire record so that the split is not done as often. For aesthetic reasons you may wish to change the array base $[ from 1 back to perl's default of 0, but remember to change all array sub- scripts AND all substr() and index() operations to match. Cute comments that say "# Here is a workaround because awk is dumb" are passed through unmodified. Awk scripts are often embedded in a shell script that pipes stuff into and out of awk. Often the shell script wrapper can be incorporated into the perl script, since perl can start up pipes into and out of itself, and can do other things that awk can't do by itself. Scripts that refer to the special variables RSTART and RLENGTH can often be simplified by referring to the variables $`, $& and $', as long as they are within the scope of the pattern match that sets them. The produced perl script may have subroutines defined to deal with awk's semantics regarding getline and print. Since a2p usually picks correctness over efficiency. it is almost always possible to rewrite such code to be more efficient by discarding the semantic sugar. For efficiency, you may wish to remove the keyword from any return statement that is the last statement executed in a subroutine. A2p catches the most common case, but doesn't analyze embedded blocks for subtler cases. ARGV[0] translates to $ARGV0, but ARGV[n] translates to $ARGV[$n]. A loop that tries to iterate over ARGV[0] won't find it. ENVIRONMENT
A2p uses no environment variables. AUTHOR
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org> FILES
SEE ALSO
perl The perl compiler/interpreter s2p sed to perl translator DIAGNOSTICS
BUGS
It would be possible to emulate awk's behavior in selecting string versus numeric operations at run time by inspection of the operands, but it would be gross and inefficient. Besides, a2p almost always guesses right. Storage for the awk syntax tree is currently static, and can run out. perl v5.8.9 2005-03-10 A2P(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy