Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Monitoring Solution
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Monitoring Solution Post 302970242 by bobochacha29 on Monday 4th of April 2016 08:44:01 AM
Old 04-04-2016
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjcox
snmp is your friend. A lot of those "tools" are not much more than "pretty" snmp based tools. Cacti might be an ok option just because the community often has add-ons for many enterprise things (like switches, routers, SAN, storage, hypervisors).

If you study what others have done you'll find you can write or modify Cacti to fit specific needs.

Could you give me a software, a name ... that I can find to test. Thanks
 

2 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Cybersecurity

best monitoring solution

Hi people, i would like to know your opinion about the best monitor solution that can: - monitor OS (could be ubuntu, AIX, HP-UX, redhat,...) - monitor BD (ORACLE, Mysql,...) - monitor specific services - scipts that i develop for monitoring them - have parent and child architecture, for... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gfca
1 Replies

2. Infrastructure Monitoring

How to install Cacti (a system monitoring and graphing solution) with Nginx?

Here's a short tutorial on installing Cacti with Nginx on Linux. (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: notblog
0 Replies
SENSORS-DETECT(8)					      System Manager's Manual						 SENSORS-DETECT(8)

NAME
sensors-detect - detect hardware monitoring chips SYNOPSIS
sensors-detect DESCRIPTION
sensors-detect is an interactive program that will walk you through the process of scanning your system for various hardware monitoring chips, or sensors, supported by libsensors(3), or more generally by the lm_sensors tool suite. sensors-detect will look for the following devices, in order: o Sensors embedded in CPUs, south bridges and memory controllers. o Sensors embedded in Super I/O chips. o Hardware monitoring chips accessed through ISA I/O ports. o Hardware monitoring chips reachable over the SMBus or more generally any I2C bus on your system. As the last two detection steps can cause trouble on some systems, they are normally not attempted if the second detection step led to the discovery of a Super I/O chip with complete hardware monitoring features. However, the user is always free to ask for all detection steps if so is his/her wish. This can be useful if a given system has more than one hardware monitoring chip. Some vendors are known to do this, most notably Asus and Tyan. WARNING
sensors-detect needs to access the hardware for most of the chip detections. By definition, it doesn't know which chips are there before it manages to identify them. This means that it can access chips in a way these chips do not like, causing problems ranging from SMBus lockup to permanent hardware damage (a rare case, thankfully.) The authors made their best to make the detection as safe as possible, and it turns out to work just fine in most cases, however it is impossible to guarantee that sensors-detect will not lock or kill a specific system. So, as a rule of thumb, you should not run sensors- detect on production servers, and you should not run sensors-detect if can't afford replacing a random part of your system. Also, it is recommended to not force a detection step which would have been skipped by default, unless you know what you are doing. SEE ALSO
sensors(1), libsensors(3) AUTHOR
Frodo Looijaard and Jean Delvare lm-sensors 3 December 2008 SENSORS-DETECT(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy