Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris Wtmpx File Permissions Question Post 302970010 by Derk Berk on Thursday 31st of March 2016 08:57:07 AM
Old 03-31-2016
Oracle Wtmpx File Permissions Question

Hi all,

I have been tasked to change permissions on the wtmpx file to 640. Currently the permissions are at 644. My question is will anything be affected if I change the permissions as shown? Thanks in advance.

Derek
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

how to delete entry in file "wtmpx"(/var/adm/wtmpx)

Do someone know how to delete entry(some lines) in file "wtmpx" that command "last" use it. this file is binary so I cannot edit directy. ========================= #last root pts/1 noc Fri Mar 3 22:04 still logged in root pts/1 noc Fri Mar 3 22:01 - 22:02 ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: arm_naja
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

wtmpx file

Hello everybody: the wtmpx file on my Sol8 machine, got so big (2GB), that my root partition is almost full now, can I empty that file, I read about it that it contains database of user access and auditing, so in case I emptied it will it affect my system?? Thanks alot (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: aladdin
3 Replies

3. Solaris

wtmpx file is too big

Hi, I am using Sun Solaris 5.9 OS. I have found a file called wtmpx having a size of 5.0 GB. I want to clear this file using :>/var/adm/wtmpx. My query is, would it cause any problem to the running live system. Could anyone suggest the best method to clear the file without causing problem to... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vijayakumarpc
6 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

wtmpx file is not updating

Hi in my solaris 9 system wmptx file is not updating so it is not recording any login or logout or any other entry. can any one tell me how to solve this problem (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: aaysa123
0 Replies

5. Solaris

wtmpx file

What could possibly happen if wtmpx file got deleted by mistake? Thanks, (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Pouchie1
8 Replies

6. Homework & Coursework Questions

Permissions question

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data: Don't understand this problem: The question is the unix command chmod 754 file3 would yield the same permissions as: I put: chmod u=rwx, g=rx, o=r file3 correct answer was : chmod u+rwx, g=rx, o=r file3 I guess im asking for what... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: austing5
1 Replies

7. Solaris

WTMPX File corrupted

Hi All I work on solaris 8, 9 and 10 platforms and have encountered an error which is my wtmpx files appear to be corrupted as all entries contain the date 1970 (the birth of unix). Now this is obviously not the case, so my query is: 1 - Can the existing wtmpx files be manipulated to... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: drestarr96
6 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Not logging ftp connections in /var/adm/wtmpx file (in last command output)

Hi all, I have F5 load balancer on my system and checking service status by opening an ftp session in every 30 seconds. These ftp sessions are being logged in /var/adm/wtmpx and filling up the file. when i run the last command most of the output is this ftp session. I was wondering if there is a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cepxat
1 Replies

9. Solaris

Something is removing/deleting my wtmpx file?

hi, we have a solaris 10 box that was handled by a different sysadmin before & now it is turned over to us for system administration. our concern is that if we issue the "last" command, it usually says "wtmp begins current day current month date 02:30". just like this "wtmp begins Thu Mar 7... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: booghaw
6 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Getting information from the wtmpx file

Hi, I tried running the command "last" in the server to check the users that were last logged into the system. However, I get this error : root@csidblog:# last /var/adm/wtmpx: Value too large for defined data type How do I proceed to get this info? I read some forums suggesting to use... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: anaigini45
2 Replies
lsMode(3pm)						User Contributed Perl Documentation					       lsMode(3pm)

NAME
Stat::lsMode - format file modes like the "ls -l" command does SYNOPSIS
use Stat::lsMode; $mode = (stat $file)[2]; $permissions = format_mode($mode); # $permissions is now something like `drwxr-xr-x' $permissions = file_mode($file); # Same as above $permissions = format_perms(0644); # Produces just 'rw-r--r--' $permissions = format_perms(644); # This generates a warning message: # mode 644 is very surprising. Perhaps you meant 0644... Stat::lsMode->novice(0); # Disable warning messages DESCRIPTION
"Stat::lsMode" generates mode and permission strings that look like the ones generated by the Unix "ls -l" command. For example, a regular file that is readable by everyone and writable only by its owner has the mode string "-rw-r--r--". "Stat::lsMode" will either examine the file and produce the right mode string for you, or you can pass it the mode that you get back from Perl's "stat" call. "format_mode" Given a mode number (such as the third element of the list returned by "stat"), return the appopriate ten-character mode string as it would have been generated by "ls -l". For example, consider a directory that is readable and searchable by everyone, and also writable by its owner. Such a directory will have mode 040755. When passed this value, "format_mode" will return the string "drwxr-xr-x". If "format_mode" is passed a permission number like 0755, it will return a nine-character string insted, with no leading character to say what the file type is. For example, "format_mode(0755)" will return just "rwxr-xr-x", without the leading "d". "file_mode" Given a filename, do "lstat" on the file to determine the mode, and return the mode, formatted as above. Novice Operation Mode A common mistake when dealing with permission modes is to use 644 where you meant to use 0644. Every permission has a numeric representation, but the representation only makes sense when you write the number in octal. The decimal number 644 corresponds to a permission setting, but not the one you think. If you write it in octal you get 01204, which corresponds to the unlikely permissions "-w----r-T", not to "rw-r--r--". The appearance of the bizarre permission "-w----r-T" in a program is almost a sure sign that someone used 644 when they meant to use 0644. By default, this module will detect the use of such unlikely permissions and issue a warning if you try to format them. To disable these warnings, use Stat::lsMode->novice(0); # disable novice mode Stat::lsMode->novice(1); # enable novice mode again The surprising permissions that are diagnosed by this mode are: 111 => --xr-xrwx 400 => rw--w---- 440 => rw-rwx--- 444 => rw-rwxr-- 551 => ---r--rwt 600 => --x-wx--T 640 => -w------T 644 => -w----r-T 660 => -w--w-r-T 664 => -w--wx--T 666 => -w--wx-wT 700 => -w-rwxr-T 711 => -wx---rwt 750 => -wxr-xrwT 751 => -wxr-xrwt 751 => -wxr-xrwt 755 => -wxrw--wt 770 => r------wT 771 => r------wt 775 => r-----rwt 777 => r----x--t Of these, only 400 is remotely plausible. BUGS
As far as I know, the precise definition of the mode bits is portable between varieties of Unix. The module should, however, examine "stat.h" or use some other method to find out if there are any local variations, because Unix being Unix, someone somewhere probably does it differently. Maybe it "file_mode" should have an option that says that if the file is a symlink, to format the mode of the pointed to file instead of the mode of the link itself, the way "ls -Ll" does. SEE ALSO
o "http://www.plover.com/~mjd/perl/lsMode/". o ls o chmod o stat AUTHOR
Mark-Jason Dominus ("mjd-perl-lsmode@plover.com"). perl v5.10.1 1998-04-20 lsMode(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy