Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris LUn' unmapped from storage still showing on Solaris 10 Post 302947032 by bentech4u on Sunday 14th of June 2015 11:19:16 PM
Old 06-15-2015
HI

thanks for your reply.

Code:
root@globalares2.example.com #lsof | grep /dev/rdsk/c2t600D023
bash: lsof: command not found

i am using solaris 10 SPARC. is there any patch need to install ?



Quote:
Originally Posted by TioTony
Hi bentech4u,
Try running 'lsof | grep /dev/rdsk/c2t600D023' and see if it shows any processes still using the device. Cycling the process will probably free it up.

Thanks,
Tony
---------- Post updated at 10:19 PM ---------- Previous update was at 10:08 PM ----------

hi sorry. i have installed lsof package and i got below wile trying the command you suggested

Code:
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002
lsof: no pwd entry for UID 1002

 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

command to scan Enterprise storage Lun disk in Solaris

I just installed IBMsdd on Solaris diver along with the patches recommended. I also installed 2 - 2Gigs qlogic fiber cards & the corresponding pkges for the cards. What command can I use to scan this LUN disks from my Soalris servers. Solaris doen't seem to be seeing this disks presented on it.... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Remi
2 Replies

2. Solaris

Solaris 9 or 10 LUN Limitations

Is there a limit to the number of LUNS that can be concatenated using Solaris Volume manager with Soft partitions? I have worked with some AIX admins in the past and there was such a limitation therefore limiting the size the filesystem could grow to. Is there such a limitation in Solaris 9... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: BG_JrAdmin
6 Replies

3. Solaris

new attached lun in solaris 10

hi, what are the steps to detect and configure a new attached lun in Solaris 10. Is there any difference between cfgadm and luxadm command ? rgds, snjksh (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: snjksh
5 Replies

4. Solaris

How to get LUN WWN in Solaris?

How to get LUN WWN (i.e LUN mapped from a storage box say Symmetrix or clariion) in Solaris. fcinfo command does give the Target port wwn but what i'm looking for is the LUN WWN. Any help is appreciated. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Manish00712
2 Replies

5. Solaris

Solaris 10, adding new LUN from SAN storage

Hello to all, Actually, currently on my Solaris box, I've a LUN (5TB space) from a EMC storage which is working fine, and a partition with ZFS filesystem is created for that LUN. as further you'll see in the logs, the "c4t6006016053802E00E6A9196B6506E211d0s2" is the current configured LUN in the... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Anti_Evil
4 Replies

6. Solaris

Mpathadm showing no paths to 1 lun, others luns are fine

Hi, I've noticed that mpathadm states that one of our luns has no active paths: /dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000298700009533031324333d0s2 Total Path Count: 4 Operational Path Count: 4 /dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000298700009533031333037d0s2 ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: badoshi
3 Replies

7. Solaris

Luxadm display not showing a LUN as expected

Hi all, I have the following LUN which is showing OK with its two paths: DEVICE PROPERTIES for disk: /dev/rdsk/c23t500507630A3BC579d123s2 Vendor: IBM Product ID: 2107900 Revision: 3010 Serial Num: 75WB0114900 Unformatted capacity:... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: ludiegu
13 Replies

8. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators

AIX server do not detect LUN from HP storage

ssssssssssss (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: sampathenjoy
0 Replies
PWD(1)							    BSD General Commands Manual 						    PWD(1)

NAME
pwd -- return working directory name SYNOPSIS
pwd [-LP] DESCRIPTION
pwd writes the absolute pathname of the current working directory to the standard output. The following options are available: -L If the PWD environment variable is an absolute pathname that contains neither "/./" nor "/../" and references the current directory, then PWD is assumed to be the name of the current directory. -P Print the physical path to the current working directory, with symbolic links in the path resolved. The default for the pwd command is -P. pwd is usually provided as a shell builtin (which may have a different default). EXIT STATUS
The pwd utility exits 0 on success, and >0 if an error occurs. SEE ALSO
cd(1), csh(1), ksh(1), sh(1), getcwd(3) STANDARDS
The pwd utility is expected to be conforming to IEEE Std 1003.1 (``POSIX.1''), except that the default is -P not -L. BUGS
In csh(1) the command dirs is always faster (although it can give a different answer in the rare case that the current directory or a con- taining directory was moved after the shell descended into it). pwd -L relies on the file system having unique inode numbers. If this is not true (e.g., on FAT file systems) then pwd -L may fail to detect that PWD is incorrect. BSD
October 30, 2003 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy