Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: [awk] Math & Bold-Font?
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting [awk] Math & Bold-Font? Post 302935068 by sea on Thursday 12th of February 2015 02:04:24 PM
Old 02-12-2015
Sadly, setting / comparing with value seems to be an issue for my approach:
Code:
	$AWK '/^#/ { next } ;
	{ 
		bitrate=$3+$4;
		len=( length(bitrates) ); print len
		len = length(bitrates)  ; print len
		ext="kb"; if(len >= 4) ext="mb"; 
		if(len >= 4) bitrates=(substr(bitrates,3));

		split($2, A, "x");
		pixels=A[0] * A[1];
		
		print "\t* "BOLD$1RESET,$2 "   ",pixels,$3,$4,bitrate ext,$5,$6" "$7" "$8" "$9" "$10" "$11" "$12" "$13" "$14" "$15;
		
	}' BOLD="\033[1m" RESET="\033[0m" UNDERLINE="\033[4m" OFS="\t" "$PRESETS"

  1. While i do see now 'kb' for all the bitrates, it neither changes to mb when bitrate is 5120, nor does it cut 3 numbers from the string.
  2. Is there a better way o display the whole comment, rather than " "$7" "$8" "$9" "$10" "$11" "$12" "$13" "$14" "$15 to preseve words?
  3. pixels are still empty, and would require the same 'handling' as the bitrates.

len is always 0, so that is why the check doesnt work, but how to fix that please?

Thank you
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

awk logic and math help

Hi, My file has 2 fields and millions of lines. variableStep chrom=Uextra span=25 201 0.5952 226 0.330693 251 0.121004 276 0.0736858 301 0.0646982 326 0.0736858 401 0.2952 426 0.230693 451 0.221004 476 0.2736858 Each field either has a... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: wyarosh
6 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

colored/highlighted/bold matching pattern with awk ???

Hi ! Just wondering, is it possible to color or highlight or underline a matching pattern with awk ? Or write it in bold, italic.....? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lucasvs
3 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Need help with AWK math

I am trying to do some math, so that I can compare the average of six numbers to a variable. Here is what it looks like (note that when I divide really big numbers, it isn't a real number): $ tail -n 6 named.stats | awk -F\, '{print$1}' 1141804 1140566 1139429 1134210 1084682 895045... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: brianjb
3 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

output text in bold font using SED

hi I want to write a script, while using the SED editor, to output the text, in this case a variable, to the result file but highlighted it in bold, is it possible to do that? can you tell me how? eg. in text.txt sed '$ a\ '$variable' ' <text.txt >text2.txt so it will add the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: piynik
2 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk math and csv output

Hi I have this list 592;1;Z:\WB\DOCS;/FS3_100G/FILER112/BU/MPS/DOCS;;;;\\FILER112\BUMPS-DOCS\;580,116,544,878 Bytes;656,561 ;77,560 592;2;Z:\WB\FOCUS;/FS3_100G/FILER112/BU/MPS/FOCUS;;;;\\FILER112\BUMPS-FOCUS\;172,430 Bytes;6 ;0 ... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: nakaedu
12 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk in horizontal and vertical math

Based on input ail,UTT,id1_0,COMBO,21,24,21,19,85 al,UTHAST,id1_0,COMBO,342,390,361,361,1454 and awk code as awk -F, '{ K=0; for(i=NF; i>=(NF-4); i--) { K=K+$i; J=J+$i;} { print K } } END { for ( l in J ) printf("%s ",J); }' I'm trying to add columns and lines in single line. line... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: busyboy
6 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk --> math-operation in a array

Hi main object is categorize the difference of data-values (TLUFT02B - TLUFT12B). herefor i read out data-files which are named acording to the timeformat yyyymmddhhmm. WR030B 266.48 Grad 0 WR050B 271.46 Grad 0 WR120B 268.11 Grad 0 WV030B 2.51 m/s ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: IMPe
6 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Count math using awk

Hi expert, I have log : TOTAL-TIME : 2125264636 DATA-BYTES-DOWN : 3766111307032 DATA-BYTES-UP : 455032157567 DL = (3766111307032/2125264636)/1024 = 1.73 UL = (455032157567/2125264636)/1024 = 0.21 I want the result : TOTAL = 1.94 ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: justbow
4 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Math count %memory using awk

Hi expert, i have log this: Memory: 74410384 Memory: 75831176 Memory: 77961232 Memory: 77074656 Memory: 76086160 Memory: 77128592 Memory: 78045384 Memory: 76696040 Memory: 72401176 Memory: 72520016 Memory: 72137016 Memory: 73175832 Memory: 73034528 Memory: 71770736 Memory:... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: justbow
4 Replies

10. What is on Your Mind?

Slowly Removing Bold Font Style - Step-by-Step

FYI, I'm slowly removing a lot of the bold font-styles from titles of discussions, forum titles, etc I'm not removing bold for the entire site because we do need bold from time to time, especially in posts and sometimes in other places. However, the original forum style had way too much... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
3 Replies
A2P(1)							 Perl Programmers Reference Guide						    A2P(1)

NAME
a2p - Awk to Perl translator SYNOPSIS
a2p [options] [filename] DESCRIPTION
A2p takes an awk script specified on the command line (or from standard input) and produces a comparable perl script on the standard output. OPTIONS Options include: -D<number> sets debugging flags. -F<character> tells a2p that this awk script is always invoked with this -F switch. -n<fieldlist> specifies the names of the input fields if input does not have to be split into an array. If you were translating an awk script that processes the password file, you might say: a2p -7 -nlogin.password.uid.gid.gcos.shell.home Any delimiter can be used to separate the field names. -<number> causes a2p to assume that input will always have that many fields. -o tells a2p to use old awk behavior. The only current differences are: o Old awk always has a line loop, even if there are no line actions, whereas new awk does not. o In old awk, sprintf is extremely greedy about its arguments. For example, given the statement print sprintf(some_args), extra_args; old awk considers extra_args to be arguments to "sprintf"; new awk considers them arguments to "print". "Considerations" A2p cannot do as good a job translating as a human would, but it usually does pretty well. There are some areas where you may want to examine the perl script produced and tweak it some. Here are some of them, in no particular order. There is an awk idiom of putting int() around a string expression to force numeric interpretation, even though the argument is always integer anyway. This is generally unneeded in perl, but a2p can't tell if the argument is always going to be integer, so it leaves it in. You may wish to remove it. Perl differentiates numeric comparison from string comparison. Awk has one operator for both that decides at run time which comparison to do. A2p does not try to do a complete job of awk emulation at this point. Instead it guesses which one you want. It's almost always right, but it can be spoofed. All such guesses are marked with the comment ""#???"". You should go through and check them. You might want to run at least once with the -w switch to perl, which will warn you if you use == where you should have used eq. Perl does not attempt to emulate the behavior of awk in which nonexistent array elements spring into existence simply by being referenced. If somehow you are relying on this mechanism to create null entries for a subsequent for...in, they won't be there in perl. If a2p makes a split line that assigns to a list of variables that looks like (Fld1, Fld2, Fld3...) you may want to rerun a2p using the -n option mentioned above. This will let you name the fields throughout the script. If it splits to an array instead, the script is probably referring to the number of fields somewhere. The exit statement in awk doesn't necessarily exit; it goes to the END block if there is one. Awk scripts that do contortions within the END block to bypass the block under such circumstances can be simplified by removing the conditional in the END block and just exiting directly from the perl script. Perl has two kinds of array, numerically-indexed and associative. Perl associative arrays are called "hashes". Awk arrays are usually translated to hashes, but if you happen to know that the index is always going to be numeric you could change the {...} to [...]. Iteration over a hash is done using the keys() function, but iteration over an array is NOT. You might need to modify any loop that iterates over such an array. Awk starts by assuming OFMT has the value %.6g. Perl starts by assuming its equivalent, $#, to have the value %.20g. You'll want to set $# explicitly if you use the default value of OFMT. Near the top of the line loop will be the split operation that is implicit in the awk script. There are times when you can move this down past some conditionals that test the entire record so that the split is not done as often. For aesthetic reasons you may wish to change index variables from being 1-based (awk style) to 0-based (Perl style). Be sure to change all operations the variable is involved in to match. Cute comments that say "# Here is a workaround because awk is dumb" are passed through unmodified. Awk scripts are often embedded in a shell script that pipes stuff into and out of awk. Often the shell script wrapper can be incorporated into the perl script, since perl can start up pipes into and out of itself, and can do other things that awk can't do by itself. Scripts that refer to the special variables RSTART and RLENGTH can often be simplified by referring to the variables $`, $& and $', as long as they are within the scope of the pattern match that sets them. The produced perl script may have subroutines defined to deal with awk's semantics regarding getline and print. Since a2p usually picks correctness over efficiency. it is almost always possible to rewrite such code to be more efficient by discarding the semantic sugar. For efficiency, you may wish to remove the keyword from any return statement that is the last statement executed in a subroutine. A2p catches the most common case, but doesn't analyze embedded blocks for subtler cases. ARGV[0] translates to $ARGV0, but ARGV[n] translates to $ARGV[$n-1]. A loop that tries to iterate over ARGV[0] won't find it. ENVIRONMENT
A2p uses no environment variables. AUTHOR
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org> FILES
SEE ALSO
perl The perl compiler/interpreter s2p sed to perl translator DIAGNOSTICS
BUGS
It would be possible to emulate awk's behavior in selecting string versus numeric operations at run time by inspection of the operands, but it would be gross and inefficient. Besides, a2p almost always guesses right. Storage for the awk syntax tree is currently static, and can run out. perl v5.14.2 2010-12-30 A2P(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy