Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris Hardware RAID using three disks Post 302931602 by hicksd8 on Wednesday 14th of January 2015 06:18:20 AM
Old 01-14-2015
The raid1 mirror has 2 disks; c1t0d0 and c1t1d0

Let me state a few facts just to ensure that you've got the principles here. Post back any questions on these points. It's important that you understand this.

1. Your box has an integrated RAID controller (but regard it as a separate card).

2. You interrogate/configure this controller using the raidctl command which can see all disks; mirrored or not.

3. If you create a mirror (using raidctl), one of the disks disappears as far as the O/S is concerned. The RAID controller simply presents one disk to the O/S and takes care of the mirror copy to the other disk. Therefore, the other (hidden) disk is NOT visible to the format command (unless you unmirror it).

Therefore what you posted tells me that there are 2 disks in the mirror. The OPTIMAL means that it is healthy.

There is a third disk in the system (c1t3d0) which is not mirrored and just simply passed through to the O/S.

Therefore the format command sees c1t0d0 (the RAID1 mirror; really 2 disks) and the third disk (c1t3d0).

Sorry if you already knew that but just to be sure that you know what you're looking at.

Run

Code:
# mount

to see if any slice of c1t3d0 is in use.

You can also select this disk in the format command and print it's vtoc to see if it's even sliced (partitioned). Maybe there's nothing on this disk.

Why do you think that you should contemplate breaking the mirror in order to patch? Just take a backup (perhaps to c1t3d0 if it's not in use).

There's plenty of knowledge and help available on this forum. Just post your questions.

Hope that helps.
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Hardware RAID

I don't understood why on SPARC-Platforms have not present RAID-Controller ? Sorry for my bad english, but it's crazy always setup software RAID !!! I whanna Hardware RAID and when i can find solution ? (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: jess_t03
7 Replies

2. Red Hat

IBM RAID disks

We have a Red Hat linux server running on IBM x445 hardware. There are external disks in an IBM EXP300 disk enclosure. The system is running RAID 5. One of the four IBM disks (73.4 GB 10k FRU 06P5760) has become faulty. The system is still up and running OK because of the RAID. In that same EXP300... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: pdudley
3 Replies

3. Solaris

Move disks to different StorEdge, keeping RAID

Hi. I need to move a 5 disk RAID5 array from a SE3310 box to a different SE3310 array. After installing the disks in the "new" StorEdge device, I "would like" ;) to be able have access to the data which is on the RAID. Essentially, the quesion is, how can this be done? :confused: I checked... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: alexs77
5 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

RAID software vs hardware RAID

Hi Can someone tell me what are the differences between software and hardware raid ? thx for help. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: presul
2 Replies

5. Solaris

Solaris not recognizing RAID 5 disks

I've just installed Sol 10 Update 9 on a Sun 4140 server and have a RAID 1 configuration (2 136 Gb drives) for the OS and have created a RAID 5 array (6 136 GB) drives. When i log into the system I am unable to see the RAID 5 disks at all. I've tried using the devfsadm command but no luck and... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: goose25
9 Replies

6. AIX

SCSI PCI - X RAID Controller card RAID 5 AIX Disks disappeared

Hello, I have a scsi pci x raid controller card on which I had created a disk array of 3 disks when I type lspv ; I used to see 3 physical disks ( two local disks and one raid 5 disk ) suddenly the raid 5 disk array disappeared ; so the hardware engineer thought the problem was with SCSI... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: filosophizer
0 Replies

7. Solaris

Software RAID on top of Hardware RAID

Server Model: T5120 with 146G x4 disks. OS: Solaris 10 - installed on c1t0d0. Plan to use software raid (veritas volume mgr) on c1t2d0 disk. After format and label the disk, still not able to detect using vxdiskadm. Question: Should I remove the hardware raid on c1t2d0 first? My... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: KhawHL
4 Replies

8. Solaris

Solaris 10 Installation - Disks missing, and Raid

Hey everyone. First, let me start by saying I'm primarily focused on linux boxes, and just happened to get pulled into building two T5220's. I'm not super educated on sun boxes. Both T5220's have 8 146GB 15k SAS drives. Inside the service processor, I can run SHOW /SYS/HDD{0-7} and they all come... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: msarro
2 Replies

9. Solaris

Hardware raid patching

Dear All , we have hardware raid 1 implemented on Solaris Disks. We need to patch the Servers. Kindly let me know how to patch hardware raid implemented Servers. Thanks... Rj (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: jegaraman
7 Replies
CCD(4)							   BSD Kernel Interfaces Manual 						    CCD(4)

NAME
ccd -- Concatenated Disk driver SYNOPSIS
device ccd DESCRIPTION
The ccd driver provides the capability of combining one or more disks/partitions into one virtual disk. This document assumes that you are familiar with how to generate kernels, how to properly configure disks and devices in a kernel configura- tion file, and how to partition disks. In order to compile in support for the ccd, you must add a line similar to the following to your kernel configuration file: device ccd # concatenated disk devices As of the FreeBSD 3.0 release, you do not need to configure your kernel with ccd but may instead use it as a kernel loadable module. Simply running ccdconfig(8) will load the module into the kernel. A ccd may be either serially concatenated or interleaved. To serially concatenate the partitions, specify the interleave factor of 0. Note that mirroring may not be used with an interleave factor of 0. There is a run-time utility that is used for configuring ccds. See ccdconfig(8) for more information. The Interleave Factor If a ccd is interleaved correctly, a ``striping'' effect is achieved, which can increase sequential read/write performance. The interleave factor is expressed in units of DEV_BSIZE (usually 512 bytes). For large writes, the optimum interleave factor is typically the size of a track, while for large reads, it is about a quarter of a track. (Note that this changes greatly depending on the number and speed of disks.) For instance, with eight 7,200 RPM drives on two Fast-Wide SCSI buses, this translates to about 128 for writes and 32 for reads. A larger interleave tends to work better when the disk is taking a multitasking load by localizing the file I/O from any given process onto a single disk. You lose sequential performance when you do this, but sequential performance is not usually an issue with a multitasking load. An interleave factor must be specified when using a mirroring configuration, even when you have only two disks (i.e., the layout winds up being the same no matter what the interleave factor). The interleave factor will determine how I/O is broken up, however, and a value 128 or greater is recommended. ccd has an option for a parity disk, but does not currently implement it. The best performance is achieved if all component disks have the same geometry and size. Optimum striping cannot occur with different disk types. For random-access oriented workloads, such as news servers, a larger interleave factor (e.g., 65,536) is more desirable. Note that there is not much ccd can do to speed up applications that are seek-time limited. Larger interleave factors will at least reduce the chance of having to seek two disk-heads to read one directory or a file. Disk Mirroring You can configure the ccd to ``mirror'' any even number of disks. See ccdconfig(8) for how to specify the necessary flags. For example, if you have a ccd configuration specifying four disks, the first two disks will be mirrored with the second two disks. A write will be run to both sides of the mirror. A read will be run to either side of the mirror depending on what the driver believes to be most optimal. If the read fails, the driver will automatically attempt to read the same sector from the other side of the mirror. Currently ccd uses a dual seek zone model to optimize reads for a multi-tasking load rather than a sequential load. In an event of a disk failure, you can use dd(1) to recover the failed disk. Note that a one-disk ccd is not the same as the original partition. In particular, this means if you have a file system on a two-disk mir- rored ccd and one of the disks fail, you cannot mount and use the remaining partition as itself; you have to configure it as a one-disk ccd. You cannot replace a disk in a mirrored ccd partition without first backing up the partition, then replacing the disk, then restoring the partition. Linux Compatibility The Linux compatibility mode does not try to read the label that Linux' md(4) driver leaves on the raw devices. You will have to give the order of devices and the interleave factor on your own. When in Linux compatibility mode, ccd will convert the interleave factor from Linux terminology. That means you give the same interleave factor that you gave as chunk size in Linux. If you have a Linux md(4) device in ``legacy'' mode, do not use the CCDF_LINUX flag in ccdconfig(8). Use the CCDF_NO_OFFSET flag instead. In that case you have to convert the interleave factor on your own, usually it is Linux' chunk size multiplied by two. Using a Linux RAID this way is potentially dangerous and can destroy the data in there. Since FreeBSD does not read the label used by Linux, changes in Linux might invalidate the compatibility layer. However, using this is reasonably safe if you test the compatibility before mounting a RAID read-write for the first time. Just using ccdconfig(8) without mounting does not write anything to the Linux RAID. Then you do a fsck.ext2fs (ports/sysutils/e2fsprogs) on the ccd device using the -n flag. You can mount the file system read-only to check files in there. If all this works, it is unlikely that there is a problem with ccd. Keep in mind that even when the Linux compatibility mode in ccd is working correctly, bugs in FreeBSD's ex2fs implemen- tation would still destroy your data. WARNINGS
If just one (or more) of the disks in a ccd fails, the entire file system will be lost unless you are mirroring the disks. If one of the disks in a mirror is lost, you should still be able to back up your data. If a write error occurs, however, data read from that sector may be non-deterministic. It may return the data prior to the write or it may return the data that was written. When a write error occurs, you should recover and regenerate the data as soon as possible. Changing the interleave or other parameters for a ccd disk usually destroys whatever data previously existed on that disk. FILES
/dev/ccd* ccd device special files SEE ALSO
dd(1), ccdconfig(8), config(8), disklabel(8), fsck(8), gvinum(8), mount(8), newfs(8) HISTORY
The concatenated disk driver was originally written at the University of Utah. BSD
August 9, 1995 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy