Sponsored Content
Homework and Emergencies Homework & Coursework Questions Firefox is already running, but is not responding. Post 302917794 by Ankur Goyal on Thursday 18th of September 2014 02:41:27 PM
Old 09-18-2014
Firefox is already running, but is not responding.

I restarted the system but still it is giving the same error.
I removed lock files because this user is not local user so due to multiple instances it could cause the problem.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

NFS SERVER.....not responding

Hi i am using HPUX11.00 and i am facing a starnge problem after some time when i log on a message is coimng NFS server not responding still trying....and it keps on coming there is no other way but to log out..form the server and start once again... there is no file system exported or NFS... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Prafulla
3 Replies

2. HP-UX

Service processor not responding

I am receiving messages from HP-UX Server "The operating system is unable to communicate with the service processor. The support bus which connects the system processors, the service processor and the Power Monitor or Platform Monitor may have become hung ". I need help in the following:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cgege
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Portmapper not responding

Kindly When I start the server i have this error "portmapper on server 185.125.241.321 is not responding" let me also clarify that this is the old IP of the server and the new one 192.168.0.2 regards (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sak900354
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Shell not responding

Hi all (Shell: ksh Unix: NCR Unix) Upon opening a shell, I can type a command (any command), but the shell does very little or nothing. If I cd to an unknown directory, the shell responds with "file not found", if I issue 'ls', I get no directory listing (files are present). If I issue... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jgrogan
2 Replies

5. Solaris

SC on T5220 not responding

Hi, SC on one of my T5220 is not responding .. it does not show not let me type anything .. what could be the reason for it ? though when i powercycle the box from sc it shows me the system coming up but after that does not let me login thru sc sc> console -f Enter #. to return to ALOM. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: fugitive
2 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

running localhost:8080 on firefox gives error .

I have copied a simple.xml file into the folder /var/www/html and trying to access it on the brower by giving the command "http://localhost:8080/simple.xml" but it gives "Connection Failed " Error . While if i type "http://localhost/" It dispays the contents of the index.html file in the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: madhumathikv
2 Replies

7. Debian

error running firefox.desktop file

Hi, I installed the FF3 on my new Debian, and part of the installation guidance is to save a file named firefox.desktop on the desktop, which should act like a shortcut to the FF. The file content is: Name=Mozilla Firefox Browser Comment=lightweight browser based on mozilla Exec=firefox... (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: JonesD1
15 Replies

8. Solaris

Help! System not responding!

Hello All! please help. I have a solaris8 server (NIS client) that lost network connectivity to NIS master server. After restoring connectivity to NIS master server, I can't access the server. 1. The server responds to ping. 2. Telnet -- after it authenticates I do not get a prompt. 3.... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: pingmeback
3 Replies

9. Ubuntu

Tux Commander - is not responding

It is now 20 years I have used Total Commander. I was very pleased to find Tux Commander, using Ubuntu, which looks very close to TC. UNFORTUNATELY, it hangs while copying large files. Could anyone give my some tips.:b: Ubuntu 9.10 Tux Cmd version 0.6.70-dev Build date: 2009-11-15 ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Bindee
1 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

ls command is not responding...

I am attempting to run 'ls -ltr' on a directory where file is being written. After firing this command, I dont receive any response from the shell. I understand, because one of the file is writing, this must have happened. Is there any way, we can still see the listing represnted the query fire... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: videsh77
3 Replies
flock(2)							System Calls Manual							  flock(2)

Name
       flock - apply or remove an advisory lock on an open file

Syntax
       #include <sys/file.h>

       #define	 LOCK_SH   1	/* shared lock */
       #define	 LOCK_EX   2	/* exclusive lock */
       #define	 LOCK_NB   4	/* don't block when locking */
       #define	 LOCK_UN   8	/* unlock */

       flock(fd, operation)
       int fd, operation;

Description
       The  system  call applies or removes an advisory lock on the file associated with the file descriptor, fd.  A lock is applied by specifying
       an operation parameter that is the inclusive OR of LOCK_SH or LOCK_EX and, possibly, LOCK_NB.  To unlock an existing lock, operation should
       be LOCK_UN.

       Advisory  locks allow cooperating processes to perform consistent operations on files, but do not guarantee consistency; that is, processes
       might still access files without using advisory locks, possibly resulting in inconsistencies.

       The locking mechanism allows two types of locks: shared locks and exclusive locks.  At any time, multiple shared locks can be applied to  a
       file.  However, multiple exclusive locks, or shared and exclusive locks cannot be applied simultaneously on a file.

       A  shared  lock can be upgraded to be an exclusive lock, and an exclusive lock can become shared, simply by specifying the appropriate lock
       type. This change results in the previous lock being released and the new lock applied. When upgrading, do not include  LOCK_NB	in  opera-
       tion, because there is a possibility that other processes have requests for locks, or have gained or released a lock.

       Requesting  a lock on an object that is already locked normally causes the caller to blocked until the lock can be acquired.  If LOCK_NB is
       included in operation, the call is not blocked; instead, the call fails and the error EWOULDBLOCK is returned.

       Locks are on files, not file descriptors.  That is, file descriptors duplicated through or call do not result in multiple  instances  of  a
       lock,  but  rather  multiple references to a single lock.  If a process holding a lock on a file forks and the child explicitly unlocks the
       file, the parent loses its lock.

       Processes blocked awaiting a lock may be awakened by signals.

Return Values
       Zero is returned if the operation was successful; on an error, a -1 is returned and an error code is stored in the global variable, errno.

Diagnostics
       The call fails under the following conditions:

       [EWOULDBLOCK]  The file is locked and the LOCK_NB option was specified.

       [EBADF]	      The argument fd is an invalid descriptor.

       [EINVAL]       The argument fd refers to an object other than a file.

       [EOPNOTSUPP]   Invalid operation is requested.  The argument fd refers to a socket.

Restrictions
       File region locking is not supported over NFS.

See Also
       close(2), dup(2), execve(2), fork(2), open(2)

																	  flock(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy