Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting How to add nodev for /dev/shm partition in Linux using shell script? Post 302914971 by gull04 on Friday 29th of August 2014 06:16:02 PM
Old 08-29-2014
Hi Perderabo,

Inclined to agree with you having had a second look at the original post, the being new to scripting is actually a clue I realise now.

Regards

Dave
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Ran out of space on /dev/root partition

hi, I have a SCO unix server which has a 36gb hard drive, but the IT company who supplied it assigned 1gb to /dev/root, 15mb to /dev/boot and 33gb to /dev/u. The /dev/root partition is now full, is there a way I can use the 33gb assigned to /dev/u without loosing any data, preferably... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Martyn
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Need to add aditional space on an exsisting Linux Partition..

Hi, I need to add more space to an exsisting /u partition by adding an additional physical drive, so that the additional space is added in continuation to the exsisting /u diskspace. Is it possible...if yes....how do I go about it. Thanks, Amit (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: amitsayshii
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Remove /dev/sdb partition using fdisk - BY ACCIDENT!

Hello everyone - Please forgive me if I violate the forum's etiquette as this is my very first post. I'm posting this on both the dummies and the advance section with the hope for any responses. I stumbled on this forum while frantically looking for an answer to a dumb, ignorant thing I did... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kevindoman
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Remove /dev/sdb partition using fdisk - BY ACCIDENT!

Hello everyone - Please forgive me if I violate the forum's etiquette as this is my very first post. I'm posting this on both the dummies and the advance section with the hope for any responses. I stumbled on this forum while frantically looking for an answer to a dumb, ignorant thing I did... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: kevindoman
5 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Shell script to make and mount a Partition

Hi, I need to mount a new partition in a series of Pc that have a single hard drive of 20 GB; the used and partioned space amounts to 10 GB, between root, boot and swap; the script is to make the mounting process automatic These are the contents of my script: ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: HernandJ2
1 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

shell script Partition Creation

Hello all How is it going I want Shell Patch The work of the following division of the disk Can this 200 MB EXT3 /boot 20 Gb EXT3 / 10 GB Swap End Of Space ( Linux LVM ) Found a similar script can be customized by you to be the work required #!/bin/bash VSIZE=200 fdisk /dev/hda... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: x-zer0
1 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

/dev/shm space in red hat linux

I am using redhat linux machine and oracle11g version. /dev/shm shows 88%. Will this be freed automatically? OR should i clean any files? >df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/systemvg-rootvol 7.6G 2.2G 5.1G 30% /... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: govindts
5 Replies

8. Red Hat

Shrink LVM partition & create new Linux Primary partition

Hello All, I have a Red Hat Linux 5.9 Server installed with one hard disk & 2 Partitions created on it as follows, /boot - Linux Partition & another is LVM - One VG & under that 5-6 Logical volumes(var,opt,home etc). Here my requirement is to take out 1GB of space from LVM ( Any logical... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: gr8_usk
5 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Increasing size for /dev/shm

Hello, How do I increase the size of /dev/shm ? Additional pv have been added and rootlv has been extended How can I extend /dev/shm? Best regards, Vishal (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: admin_db
1 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table

Hello, I have rebooted the RHEL VM but after rebooting the vm it not showing all the partition mounted on OS level, if i'll execute the fdisk -l command, then i'm able to see the same disk. below is the fdisk output : # fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 107.6 GB, 107639996416 bytes 255 heads, 63... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: purushottamaher
1 Replies
Hook::LexWrap(3)					User Contributed Perl Documentation					  Hook::LexWrap(3)

NAME
Hook::LexWrap - Lexically scoped subroutine wrappers VERSION
This document describes version 0.23 of Hook::LexWrap. SYNOPSIS
use Hook::LexWrap; sub doit { print "[doit:", caller, "]"; return {my=>"data"} } SCOPED: { wrap doit, pre => sub { print "[pre1: @_] " }, post => sub { print "[post1:@_] "; $_[1]=9; }; my $temporarily = wrap doit, post => sub { print "[post2:@_] " }, pre => sub { print "[pre2: @_] "}; @args = (1,2,3); doit(@args); # pre2->pre1->doit->post1->post2 } @args = (4,5,6); doit(@args); # pre1->doit->post1 DESCRIPTION
Hook::LexWrap allows you to install a pre- or post-wrapper (or both) around an existing subroutine. Unlike other modules that provide this capacity (e.g. Hook::PreAndPost and Hook::WrapSub), Hook::LexWrap implements wrappers in such a way that the standard "caller" function works correctly within the wrapped subroutine. To install a prewrappers, you write: use Hook::LexWrap; wrap 'subroutine_name', pre => &some_other_sub; #or: wrap *subroutine_name, pre => &some_other_sub; The first argument to "wrap" is a string containing the name of the subroutine to be wrapped (or the typeglob containing it, or a reference to it). The subroutine name may be qualified, and the subroutine must already be defined. The second argument indicates the type of wrapper being applied and must be either 'pre' or 'post'. The third argument must be a reference to a subroutine that implements the wrapper. To install a post-wrapper, you write: wrap 'subroutine_name', post => &yet_another_sub; #or: wrap *subroutine_name, post => &yet_another_sub; To install both at once: wrap 'subroutine_name', pre => &some_other_sub, post => &yet_another_sub; or: wrap *subroutine_name, post => &yet_another_sub, # order in which wrappers are pre => &some_other_sub; # specified doesn't matter Once they are installed, the pre- and post-wrappers will be called before and after the subroutine itself, and will be passed the same argument list. The pre- and post-wrappers and the original subroutine also all see the same (correct!) values from "caller" and "wantarray". Short-circuiting and long-circuiting return values The pre- and post-wrappers both receive an extra argument in their @_ arrays. That extra argument is appended to the original argument list (i.e. is can always be accessed as $_[-1]) and acts as a place-holder for the original subroutine's return value. In a pre-wrapper, $_[-1] is -- for obvious reasons -- "undef". However, $_[-1] may be assigned to in a pre-wrapper, in which case Hook::LexWrap assumes that the original subroutine has been "pre-empted", and that neither it, nor the corresponding post-wrapper, nor any wrappers that were applied before the pre-empting pre-wrapper was installed, need be run. Note that any post-wrappers that were installed after the pre-empting pre-wrapper was installed will still be called before the original subroutine call returns. In a post-wrapper, $_[-1] contains the return value produced by the wrapped subroutine. In a scalar return context, this value is the scalar return value. In an list return context, this value is a reference to the array of return values. $_[-1] may be assigned to in a post-wrapper, and this changes the return value accordingly. Access to the arguments and return value is useful for implementing techniques such as memoization: my %cache; wrap fibonacci, pre => sub { $_[-1] = $cache{$_[0]} if $cache{$_[0]} }, post => sub { $cache{$_[0]} = $_[-1] }; or for converting arguments and return values in a consistent manner: # set_temp expects and returns degrees Fahrenheit, # but we want to use Celsius wrap set_temp, pre => sub { splice @_, 0, 1, $_[0] * 1.8 + 32 }, post => sub { $_[-1] = ($_[0] - 32) / 1.8 }; Lexically scoped wrappers Normally, any wrappers installed by "wrap" remain attached to the subroutine until it is undefined. However, it is possible to make specific wrappers lexically bound, so that they operate only until the end of the scope in which they're created (or until some other specific point in the code). If "wrap" is called in a non-void context: my $lexical = wrap 'sub_name', pre => &wrapper; it returns a special object corresponding to the particular wrapper being placed around the original subroutine. When that object is destroyed -- when its container variable goes out of scope, or when its reference count otherwise falls to zero (e.g. "undef $lexical"), or when it is explicitly destroyed ("$lexical->DESTROY") -- the corresponding wrapper is removed from around the original subroutine. Note, however, that all other wrappers around the subroutine are preserved. Anonymous wrappers If the subroutine to be wrapped is passed as a reference (rather than by name or by typeglob), "wrap" does not install the wrappers around the original subroutine. Instead it generates a new subroutine which acts as if it were the original with those wrappers around it. It then returns a reference to that new subroutine. Only calls to the original through that wrapped reference invoke the wrappers. Direct by- name calls to the original, or calls through another reference, do not. If the original is subsequently wrapped by name, the anonymously wrapped subroutine reference does not see those wrappers. In other words, wrappers installed via a subroutine reference are completely independent of those installed via the subroutine's name (or typeglob). For example: sub original { print "ray" } # Wrap anonymously... my $anon_wrapped = wrap &original, pre => sub { print "do..." }; # Show effects... original(); # prints "ray" $anon_wrapped->(); # prints "do..ray" # Wrap nonymously... wrap *original, pre => sub { print "fa.." }, post => sub { print "..mi" }; # Show effects... original(); # now prints "fa..ray..mi" $anon_wrapped->(); # still prints "do...ray" DIAGNOSTICS
"Can't wrap non-existent subroutine %s" An attempt was made to wrap a subroutine that was not defined at the point of wrapping. "'pre' value is not a subroutine reference" The value passed to "wrap" after the 'pre' flag was not a subroutine reference. Typically, someone forgot the "sub" on the anonymous subroutine: wrap 'subname', pre => { your_code_here() }; and Perl interpreted the last argument as a hash constructor. "'post' value is not a subroutine reference" The value passed to "wrap" after the 'post' flag was not a subroutine reference. "Uselessly wrapped subroutine reference in void context" (warning only) When the subroutine to be wrapped is passed as a subroutine reference, "wrap" does not install the wrapper around the original, but instead returns a reference to a subroutine which wraps the original (see "Anonymous wrappers"). However, there's no point in doing this if you don't catch the resulting subroutine reference. AUTHOR
Damian Conway (damian@conway.org) BLAME
Schwern made me do this (by implying it wasn't possible ;-) BUGS
There are undoubtedly serious bugs lurking somewhere in code this funky :-) Bug reports and other feedback are most welcome. SEE ALSO
Sub::Prepend COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 2001, Damian Conway. All Rights Reserved. This module is free software. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the same terms as Perl itself. perl v5.18.2 2017-10-06 Hook::LexWrap(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy