Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: HP-UX Clustering
Operating Systems HP-UX HP-UX Clustering Post 302900120 by bazillion on Sunday 4th of May 2014 03:21:29 PM
Old 05-04-2014
HP HP-UX Clustering

Hello guys,

I would like to ask for your assistance, since i am new to HP-UX.
Please give me some documentation about clustering in HP-UX. More precisely design,architecture, configuring etc. I am working on my master thesis right now and would like to include some guidance about that. Unfortunately , i am having a lot of troubles finding decent info about that topic.

Thank you in advance! Smilie

BR,
Bazillion
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. IP Networking

Clustering Two Ultra 5 Boxes

Can someone please help me to cluster two SUN Ultra 5 Boxes to run a application ? I am running Solaris 7 with two Ethernet NICs in each box. The Primary nics have a address of 10.10.10.24x and the other two nics have a multicast address of 224.0.1.27 each. I want to run a application at work... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: keyur
6 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Clustering or not

I woulld like to use the JDE newest version, but I am considering whether using 2 X Wintel server with clustering or 1 Unix server without clustering. Is Unix stable enough to except the clustering? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: superlouis
0 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Mirroring and Clustering with Veritas

Can anybody help me how to mirror the solaris 10 step-by-step with veritas. Have two disks. Then how can I cluster with veritas (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: karole
1 Replies

4. HP-UX

need to recall my hp serviceguard clustering

hi, do u know any link that will get back to me up to speed on hp serviceguard on clustering? thanks and much appreciated, itik (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: itik
2 Replies

5. Solaris

Clustering filesystems

SunOS 5.10 Generic_142900-15 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise How can I tell if "clustering" is being used in my shop? I have to file systems that are identical. These filesystems are nfs mounted. But how can I tell if they are being kept in sync as a result of clustering or some other... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Harleyrci
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Linux Clustering

hi guys Some time ago I used Linux HA(Heartbeat) to setup like 3 cluster. Now I have to install another 2 cluster and was checking more info to be sure HA was still used but I found some other stuff like OpenAIS - Corosync - Pacemaker to tell you the truth I am kinda confused here I get... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: karlochacon
0 Replies

7. Linux

Linux os clustering

Hi, I have done the OS clustering in linux redhat 5.6, my one node is down and when i am trying to reboot the other node it is not coming up. any pointer to this would be helpful. the SAN storage luns are not coming as mounted (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mohitj.engg
2 Replies

8. Red Hat

Clustering Technology Documentation

Hello, I'm new in this forum. I'll have a new project to change architecture for our servers. From one server where we found database oracle 9i and Oracle application ebs 11 installed in HPux to cluster that contain nodes in redhat. Can you give me a detailed documentation that... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Safi1982
1 Replies

9. Ubuntu

Newbie With Linux Clustering, Need Help!!

Hi All, I am new user here and a new one to try clustering with Ubuntu nodes, and need help. If I should be in another place please mention. I have a two nodes with Ubuntu 14.04 installed on them. I need to make a cluster consisting of these two nodes with purpose of experimentation with... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: IncognitoExpert
3 Replies

10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Clustering for beginners. Few questions.

Hello! I need some advices from You. How many days i need to setup cluster using virtual box for mid exp user? Do you have any ideas related to master thesis related to clustering? I need to include some search aspect within that topic.Can You recommend some books/docs about that case? Thank... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: protos27
4 Replies
GIT-RERERE(1)							    Git Manual							     GIT-RERERE(1)

NAME
git-rerere - Reuse recorded resolution of conflicted merges SYNOPSIS
git rerere [clear|forget <pathspec>|diff|remaining|status|gc] DESCRIPTION
In a workflow employing relatively long lived topic branches, the developer sometimes needs to resolve the same conflicts over and over again until the topic branches are done (either merged to the "release" branch, or sent out and accepted upstream). This command assists the developer in this process by recording conflicted automerge results and corresponding hand resolve results on the initial manual merge, and applying previously recorded hand resolutions to their corresponding automerge results. Note You need to set the configuration variable rerere.enabled in order to enable this command. COMMANDS
Normally, git rerere is run without arguments or user-intervention. However, it has several commands that allow it to interact with its working state. clear Reset the metadata used by rerere if a merge resolution is to be aborted. Calling git am [--skip|--abort] or git rebase [--skip|--abort] will automatically invoke this command. forget <pathspec> Reset the conflict resolutions which rerere has recorded for the current conflict in <pathspec>. diff Display diffs for the current state of the resolution. It is useful for tracking what has changed while the user is resolving conflicts. Additional arguments are passed directly to the system diff command installed in PATH. status Print paths with conflicts whose merge resolution rerere will record. remaining Print paths with conflicts that have not been autoresolved by rerere. This includes paths whose resolutions cannot be tracked by rerere, such as conflicting submodules. gc Prune records of conflicted merges that occurred a long time ago. By default, unresolved conflicts older than 15 days and resolved conflicts older than 60 days are pruned. These defaults are controlled via the gc.rerereunresolved and gc.rerereresolved configuration variables respectively. DISCUSSION
When your topic branch modifies an overlapping area that your master branch (or upstream) touched since your topic branch forked from it, you may want to test it with the latest master, even before your topic branch is ready to be pushed upstream: o---*---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o master For such a test, you need to merge master and topic somehow. One way to do it is to pull master into the topic branch: $ git checkout topic $ git merge master o---*---o---+ topic / / o---o---o---*---o---o master The commits marked with * touch the same area in the same file; you need to resolve the conflicts when creating the commit marked with +. Then you can test the result to make sure your work-in-progress still works with what is in the latest master. After this test merge, there are two ways to continue your work on the topic. The easiest is to build on top of the test merge commit +, and when your work in the topic branch is finally ready, pull the topic branch into master, and/or ask the upstream to pull from you. By that time, however, the master or the upstream might have been advanced since the test merge +, in which case the final commit graph would look like this: $ git checkout topic $ git merge master $ ... work on both topic and master branches $ git checkout master $ git merge topic o---*---o---+---o---o topic / / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master When your topic branch is long-lived, however, your topic branch would end up having many such "Merge from master" commits on it, which would unnecessarily clutter the development history. Readers of the Linux kernel mailing list may remember that Linus complained about such too frequent test merges when a subsystem maintainer asked to pull from a branch full of "useless merges". As an alternative, to keep the topic branch clean of test merges, you could blow away the test merge, and keep building on top of the tip before the test merge: $ git checkout topic $ git merge master $ git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# rewind the test merge $ ... work on both topic and master branches $ git checkout master $ git merge topic o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master This would leave only one merge commit when your topic branch is finally ready and merged into the master branch. This merge would require you to resolve the conflict, introduced by the commits marked with *. However, this conflict is often the same conflict you resolved when you created the test merge you blew away. git rerere helps you resolve this final conflicted merge using the information from your earlier hand resolve. Running the git rerere command immediately after a conflicted automerge records the conflicted working tree files, with the usual conflict markers <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>> in them. Later, after you are done resolving the conflicts, running git rerere again will record the resolved state of these files. Suppose you did this when you created the test merge of master into the topic branch. Next time, after seeing the same conflicted automerge, running git rerere will perform a three-way merge between the earlier conflicted automerge, the earlier manual resolution, and the current conflicted automerge. If this three-way merge resolves cleanly, the result is written out to your working tree file, so you do not have to manually resolve it. Note that git rerere leaves the index file alone, so you still need to do the final sanity checks with git diff (or git diff -c) and git add when you are satisfied. As a convenience measure, git merge automatically invokes git rerere upon exiting with a failed automerge and git rerere records the hand resolve when it is a new conflict, or reuses the earlier hand resolve when it is not. git commit also invokes git rerere when committing a merge result. What this means is that you do not have to do anything special yourself (besides enabling the rerere.enabled config variable). In our example, when you do the test merge, the manual resolution is recorded, and it will be reused when you do the actual merge later with the updated master and topic branch, as long as the recorded resolution is still applicable. The information git rerere records is also used when running git rebase. After blowing away the test merge and continuing development on the topic branch: o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master $ git rebase master topic o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master you could run git rebase master topic, to bring yourself up-to-date before your topic is ready to be sent upstream. This would result in falling back to a three-way merge, and it would conflict the same way as the test merge you resolved earlier. git rerere will be run by git rebase to help you resolve this conflict. GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.7.10.4 11/24/2012 GIT-RERERE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy