Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: [Solved] wc behaving weirdly
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users [Solved] wc behaving weirdly Post 302892514 by cokedude on Thursday 13th of March 2014 08:13:42 AM
Old 03-13-2014
[Solved] wc behaving weirdly

Can anyone explain why wc is behaving weirdly? Their are only 2 occurrences but wc thinks their are 7 occurrences. I have even manually checked this.

Code:
$ grep -i base *
lit:         base    xx
lit.lst:003- 00103                            BASE    XX

$ grep -i base * | wc -w                        7

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

csplit not behaving

I have a large file with the first 2 characters of each line determining the type of record. type 03 being a subheader and then it will have multiple 04 records. eg: 03,xxx,xxxx,xxxx 04,xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 04,xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 03,xxx,xxx,xxx ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: badg3r
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

/etc/hosts on Ubuntu behaving strangely

Hy guys, I'm having a very strange problem, every time I change the /etc/hosts file on an Ubuntu machine @ work, every time I change the line: 127.0.0.1 programmer.COMPANY to 127.0.0.1 programmer.COMPANY programmer It works till the next reboot, now, I have never experienced this on... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Zarnick
5 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

tr command behaving unexpectedly

Im trying to execute the below command on our server to list files and replace the newline in the file list with spaces, but the character 'n' is getting replaced with a space, is there any environment variable that needs to be set in UNIX? sh -c 'ls -trx... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rameshrr3
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

FTP behaving erraneous way

Hi Gurus, I tried FTP one file to UNIX which got values like wel^come If I see the content in unix, it shows like wel^Zcome ^ coverted into ^Z (Control + Z ) Can someone please share what is happening here? Thanks, Shahnaz (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: shahnazurs
5 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Uniq command behaving odd

My file has k s j v l k a s f l k s a d f j l a s (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: phoenix_nebula
3 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

sed and cut behaving differently

I have attached a file with few records. First 2 characters of each record are binary characters. I can remove it by and it works fine. But is behaving differently and removing more than expected characters. Can someone help me in accomplishing it through sed? Thanks in advance. (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: amicon007
13 Replies

7. Red Hat

nslookup behaving strangely

I have two servers on same domain. one can nslookup other cannot Psu100 can lookup to psu000, psu010 & psu011 Psu110 can NOT lookup to psu000, psu010 & psu011 I verified resolv.conf entries on both psu000 and psu010 and it contains both name servers (10.200.10.21 & 10.200.11.22).I am... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: scorohan
1 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Grep command behaving strangely

Hi, I need to count number of '$' symbol in a file and assign it to a variable. I am using below command. grep -c '\$' inputfile O/p: 10359 Its giving correct o/p but when I am assigning the same to a variable its giving completely different o/p. ab1=`grep -c '\$' inputfile` $... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Opamps123
3 Replies

9. Programming

Application behaving in 3 different ways on 3 different machines

Hello. During the holidays I've been developing an application on my desktop computer at home. I setup a repository on github, so when I got back to work I cloned the repo to my laptop. It wouldn't work. The app is comprised of a client and a server, strangely enough the server would segfault... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: erupter
10 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk not behaving as expected

Hi, Immediate help on below will be appreciated. I have to read a file (max of 10MB) which will have no new line characters, i.e. data in single line. and have to inster '\n' at every 100 characters. and if record starts with 'BUCA' then need to pick value of length 10 at position 71 and... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: maks475
7 Replies
GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)						    Git Manual							 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)

NAME
git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge SYNOPSIS
git merge-base [-a|--all] <commit> <commit>... git merge-base [-a|--all] --octopus <commit>... git merge-base --independent <commit>... DESCRIPTION
git merge-base finds best common ancestor(s) between two commits to use in a three-way merge. One common ancestor is better than another common ancestor if the latter is an ancestor of the former. A common ancestor that does not have any better common ancestor is a best common ancestor, i.e. a merge base. Note that there can be more than one merge base for a pair of commits. OPERATION MODE
As the most common special case, specifying only two commits on the command line means computing the merge base between the given two commits. More generally, among the two commits to compute the merge base from, one is specified by the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a (possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining commits on the command line. As a consequence, the merge base is not necessarily contained in each of the commit arguments if more than two commits are specified. This is different from git-show-branch(1) when used with the --merge-base option. --octopus Compute the best common ancestors of all supplied commits, in preparation for an n-way merge. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --merge-base. --independent Instead of printing merge bases, print a minimal subset of the supplied commits with the same ancestors. In other words, among the commits given, list those which cannot be reached from any other. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --independent. OPTIONS
-a, --all Output all merge bases for the commits, instead of just one. DISCUSSION
Given two commits A and B, git merge-base A B will output a commit which is reachable from both A and B through the parent relationship. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---B / ---o---1---o---o---o---A the merge base between A and B is 1. Given three commits A, B and C, git merge-base A B C will compute the merge base between A and a hypothetical commit M, which is a merge between B and C. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---o---C / / o---o---o---B / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A the result of git merge-base A B C is 1. This is because the equivalent topology with a merge commit M between B and C is: o---o---o---o---o / / o---o---o---o---M / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A and the result of git merge-base A M is 1. Commit 2 is also a common ancestor between A and M, but 1 is a better common ancestor, because 2 is an ancestor of 1. Hence, 2 is not a merge base. The result of git merge-base --octopus A B C is 2, because 2 is the best common ancestor of all commits. When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one best common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology: ---1---o---A / X / ---2---o---o---B both 1 and 2 are merge-bases of A and B. Neither one is better than the other (both are best merge bases). When the --all option is not given, it is unspecified which best one is output. SEE ALSO
git-rev-list(1), git-show-branch(1), git-merge(1) GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.7.10.4 11/24/2012 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy