Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming 64 bit code debugging using gdb and ddd Post 302892031 by shamrock on Monday 10th of March 2014 11:39:49 AM
Old 03-10-2014
How about scaling down you application to 32-bit...
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Debugging 64bit code with gdb and ddd in AIX

I'm trying to use the GDB debugger and DDD to debug 64bit code. It seems that the AIX toolkit gdb version 6.0 works with 64bit code. But the ddd tool when running gdb gives the following errors : Starting program: <my binary> <my params> warning: "": not in executable format: There is an input... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bean66
2 Replies

2. Programming

Debugging a running process in GDB

Hi , Any gdb user could see my problem. Let me describe what i want to do. i have a test utility to send message to running process. My interest is to go through to functions calls when my test case starts. In a simple way i want have a code walk for a particular scenario of a test... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: meet123321
1 Replies

3. Programming

ddd/gdb debugger problem

I hope this is the right thread - not sure if it belongs in the Linux forum. Anyway, I'm having an issue with ddd and gdb. When using ddd to run gdb, there are extra parameters being appended, and my program is picking them up. I'm running on Ubuntu 11.04... Here's my command line entry - ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jalburger
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

DDD and GDB rereads ~/.cshrc

Who know why GDB reads my ~/.cshrc again when I type "run" command? Same happends when run DDD debugger (it runs GDB inside) I need the program to inherit the environment from the current shell. How to disable this behavior? I use GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux (7.0.1-32.el5_6.2) (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: baruchgu
3 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

DDD is waiting for GDB to get Ready

Hello, I'm attempting to use the DDD program. After launching it from the shell I try to set a breakpoint on a source code file and when I click run it hangs and says Waiting until GDB gets ready. I cannot do anything inside the program except quit (and even that takes a while). Can someone tell... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lamentofking
3 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

GDB Debugging Problem

I have added some code in my file. I have created executable rpm file of our code and also I have created debuginfo and debugsource files and installed all three. But when I debug in gdb I see the the code changes in soucre file. But the break point does not hit at that place as if it did not... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rupeshkp728
1 Replies

7. Red Hat

Gdb error while debugging core file

Hi, I am trying to analyze one core file on my RHEL 6.5, but I am getting below error related to the core file. So I am not getting any stack trace about the crash. # gdb MyDebugBin /var/core/MyDebugBin.27005 GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux (7.2-60.el6_4.1) Copyright (C) 2010 Free... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sanzee007
2 Replies

8. AIX

Gdb on a 64 bit executable - cannot access memory

Hi, Can anyone explain this please..... A simple test program... ### snip #include <stdio.h> main() { static int n; n = 6; printf("hello %d\n", n); n=7; } ### snip 64 bit compile/link.... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bagpussnz
2 Replies

9. Programming

Best guide or video for gdb <register level debugging>

would like to know best guide or document for gdb for different architectures x86 , power pc etc.. would like to understand how to debug segmentation faults because of stack corruption .. understand utilities ELF , objdump etc.. please guide me (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Gopi Krishna P
1 Replies
pnmscalefixed(1)					      General Commands Manual						  pnmscalefixed(1)

NAME
pnmscalefixed - scale a portable anymap quickly, but less accurate DESCRIPTION
pnmscalefixed is the same thing as pnmscale except that it uses fixed point arithmetic internally instead of floating point, which makes it run faster. In turn, it is less accurate and may distort the image. Use the pnmscale man page with pnmscalefixed. This man page only describes the difference. pnmscalefixed uses fixed point 12 bit arithmetic. By contrast, pnmscale uses floating point arithmetic which on most machines is probably 24 bit precision. This makes pnmscalefixed run faster (30% faster in one experiment), but the imprecision can cause distortions at the right and bottom edges. The distortion takes the following form: One pixel from the edge of the input is rendered larger in the output than the scaling factor requires. Consequently, the rest of the image is smaller than the scaling factor requires, because the overall dimensions of the image are always as requested. This distortion will usually be very hard to see. pnmscalefixed with the -verbose option tells you how much distortion there is. The amount of distortion depends on the size of the input image and how close the scaling factor is to an integral 1/4096th. If the scaling factor is an exact multiple of 1/4096, there is no distortion. So, for example doubling or halving an image causes no dis- tortion. But reducing it or enlarging it by a third would cause some distortion. To consider an extreme case, scaling a 100,000 row image down to 50,022 rows would create an output image with all of the input squeezed into the top 50,000 rows, and the last row of the input copied into the bottom 22 rows of output. pnmscalefixed could probably be modified to use 16 bit or better arithmetic without losing anything. The modification would consist of a single constant in the source code. Until there is a demonstrated need for that, though, the Netpbm maintainer wants to keep the safety cushion afforded by the original 12 bit precision. pnmscalefixed does not have pnmscale 's -nomix option. 18 November 2000 pnmscalefixed(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy