Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Following Cables for Fun!
The Lounge War Stories Following Cables for Fun! Post 302883600 by Corona688 on Wednesday 15th of January 2014 10:59:57 AM
Old 01-15-2014
Careful which bit you cut, it might leap out roaring and eat you all.
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Scsi cables - which ones?

Is there any specific scsi cables that you need to get when connecting a tape drive or external storage or does one type of cable fit all? ie. I can buy the following: HD68 to HD68 with Ferrites supports S-E Ultra/Wide transfer rates. But will this work for tape drives and storage? I... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: frustrated1
1 Replies

2. IP Networking

fc cables

hi friends, we are using fc cables and fc switches,u might be aware of the cost factor of it so just wanted to know that Why do we need FC switches and fiber-optic cables? Is it not possible to use, say, twisted-pair copper cables instead of fiber-optic cables, and achieve almost comparable... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mxms755
3 Replies

3. Solaris

1 or 2 Fiber cables?

Hi Community, I'm working on Solaris 10 installation with 1 Server V490 and 1 StoredgeTek 3510 (Standalone configuration). I'd connect the Server to the Storedge with a fiber cable but I' m in doubt becouse I don't know if using 1 or 2 fiber cable. Could you provide me any solution? ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sunb3
2 Replies

4. What is on Your Mind?

fun scripts

Lets get a list of everyones funny scripts (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: JamieMurry
8 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Fun with awk

uggc://ra.jvxvcrqvn.bet/jvxv/EBG13 #!/usr/bin/awk -f BEGIN { for (n=0;n<26;n++) { x=sprintf("%c",n+65); y=sprintf("%c",(n+13)%26+65) r=y; r=tolower(y) } } { b = "" for (n=1; x=substr($0,n,1); n++) b = b ((y=r)?y:x) print b } ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: colemar
0 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

More fun with awk

#!/usr/bin/ksh ls -l $@ | awk ' /^-/ { l = 5*log($5) h = sprintf("%7d %-72s",$5,$8) print "\x1B ls command with histogram of file sizes. The histogram scale is logaritmic, to avoid very short bars for smaller files or very long bars for bigger files. Screenshot: (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: colemar
4 Replies

7. Solaris

SUNFIRE V240 procedure to shutdown with safety in order to replace power cables

Question: Which commands to use to shutdown with safety the server; (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: doudou2012
2 Replies

8. Hardware

Flat cables vs normal circular cables

Do flat cables have any advantage over normal circular cables? I was looking at this. 6ft 2M Flat USB Sync Data Cable Charger Cord for iPhone4 4S 3G iPad1 2 3 Orange | eBay (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: cokedude
2 Replies

9. IP Networking

What RJ11 Cables Should I Use?

Hello All, I have a project I'm working on which involves a linux PC and a USB (*dialup) Modem in a remote location for telnet'ing to that PC by phone when the Ethernet connection is down. I have already purchased the USB modems I need and some dumb phones for line testing... Now I'm trying... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: mrm5102
7 Replies
TIME2POSIX(3)						   BSD Library Functions Manual 					     TIME2POSIX(3)

NAME
time2posix, time2posix_z, posix2time, posix2time_z, -- convert seconds since the Epoch LIBRARY
Standard C Library (libc, -lc) SYNOPSIS
#include <time.h> time_t time2posix(time_t t); time_t time2posix_z(const timezone_t tz, time_t t); time_t posix2time(time_t t); time_t posix2time_z(const timezone_t tz, time_t t); DESCRIPTION
IEEE Std 1003.1 (``POSIX.1'') legislates that a time_t value of 536457599 shall correspond to Wed Dec 31 23:59:59 UTC 1986. This effectively implies that POSIX time_t's cannot include leap seconds and, therefore, that the system time must be adjusted as each leap occurs. If the time package is configured with leap-second support enabled, however, no such adjustment is needed and time_t values continue to increase over leap events (as a true `seconds since...' value). This means that these values will differ from those required by POSIX by the net number of leap seconds inserted since the Epoch. Typically this is not a problem as the type time_t is intended to be (mostly) opaque -- time_t values should only be obtained-from and passed-to functions such as time(3), localtime(3), localtime_r(3), localtime_rz(3), mktime(3), mktime_z(3), and difftime(3). However, POSIX gives an arithmetic expression for directly computing a time_t value from a given date/time, and the same relationship is assumed by some (usually older) applications. Any programs creating/dissecting time_t's using such a relationship will typically not handle intervals over leap seconds correctly. The time2posix(), time2posix_z(), posix2time(), and posix2time_z() functions are provided to address this time_t mismatch by converting between local time_t values and their POSIX equivalents. This is done by accounting for the number of time-base changes that would have taken place on a POSIX system as leap seconds were inserted or deleted. These converted values can then be used in lieu of correcting the older applications, or when communicating with POSIX-compliant systems. time2posix() and time2posix_z() are single-valued. That is, every local time_t corresponds to a single POSIX time_t. posix2time() and posix2time() are less well-behaved: for a positive leap second hit the result is not unique, and for a negative leap second hit the corre- sponding POSIX time_t doesn't exist so an adjacent value is returned. Both of these are good indicators of the inferiority of the POSIX rep- resentation. The ``z'' variants of the two functions behave exactly like their counterparts, but they operate in the given tz argument which was previ- ously allocated using tzalloc(3) and are re-entrant. The following table summarizes the relationship between a time_t and its conversion to, and back from, the POSIX representation over the leap second inserted at the end of June, 1993. DATE TIME T X=time2posix(T) posix2time(X) 93/06/30 23:59:59 A+0 B+0 A+0 93/06/30 23:59:60 A+1 B+1 A+1 or A+2 93/07/01 00:00:00 A+2 B+1 A+1 or A+2 93/07/01 00:00:01 A+3 B+2 A+3 A leap second deletion would look like... DATE TIME T X=time2posix(T) posix2time(X) ??/06/30 23:59:58 A+0 B+0 A+0 ??/07/01 00:00:00 A+1 B+2 A+1 ??/07/01 00:00:01 A+2 B+3 A+2 [Note: posix2time(B+1) => A+0 or A+1] If leap-second support is not enabled, local time_t's and POSIX time_t's are equivalent, and both time2posix() and posix2time() degenerate to the identity function. SEE ALSO
difftime(3), localtime(3), localtime_r(3), localtime_rz(3), mktime(3), mktime_z(3), time(3), tzalloc(3) BSD
December 4, 2010 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy