Hey everyone, I've noticed that when I do a dig command, I don't get any authoritative records back. For example a dig to cnn.com just yields:
At first I thought it was because my caching server already had it, but I tried a multitude of sites, and none return any authoritative records. How is this?
Even with the +authority switch it doesn't return anything. Is it possible the ISP can block this ? That was my first thought, or is there something else at play?
Last edited by Scott; 11-29-2013 at 05:39 PM..
Reason: Code tags
I am supposed to setup a Domain Name Server, and I don't really know how to do this, can someone either help me, or point me in the direction of a site that has a good explination of how to do this.
Thanks,
Ronnie (5 Replies)
Hello,
I've created new DNS servers and changed all of the clients /etc/resolv.conf to point to them, but when I check the old DNS logs, I see that the clients are still querying it. Does anybody know why?
thanks, (2 Replies)
Hello,
I'm using CentOS 5.3, and I connect to a VPN in order to work. The problem is that I'm constantly accessing things on the local network and the remote network. But once I'm connected to the VPN I can't access local addresses by name, I have to use the ip-address.
What I'd like is to... (4 Replies)
I'd like to get some opnions on choosing DNS server:
Windows DNS vs Linux BIND comparrsion:
1) managment, easy of use
2) Security
3) features
4) peformance
5) ??
I personally prefer Windows DNS server for management, it supports GUI and command line. But I am not sure about security... (2 Replies)
I am trying to setup a CentOS 6.2 server that will be doing 3 things DHCP, DNS & Samba for a very small office (2 users). The idea being this will replace a very old Win2k server. The users are all windows based clients so only the server will be Linux based.
I've installed CentOS 6.2 with... (4 Replies)
I have read many tutorials on bind and i understand the A,MX, CNAME records.
Internally, on a LAN we can install bind and create all these records and we can tell all PC and servers to use this bind as DNS server.that's fine.
On the Internet, when we have purchased a valid domain like... (5 Replies)
Since a few weeks i use Ubuntu 16 on my laptop:
# uname -a
Linux xxxx 4.8.0-52-generic #55~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 28 14:36:29 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Because i want to use a custom name server i set the properties in the "Edit Connections" dialogue to the following:
... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bakunin
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
ldns-walk
ldns-walk(1) General Commands Manual ldns-walk(1)NAME
ldns-walk - Retrieve the contents of a DNSSEC signed zone
SYNOPSIS
ldns-walk [ OPTION ] ZONE
DESCRIPTION
ldns-walk is used to retrieve the contents of a DNSSEC signed zone. It does this through NSEC-walking (following the chain of NSEC
records) and 'guessing' the next non-existent owner name for each NSEC.
Note that it might get stuck on some wildcard records when used through a caching forwarder. This problem can be circumvented by querying
the authoritative nameserver directly (with the @ argument).
Of course the nameserver that is used must be DNSSEC-aware.
OPTIONS -f Do a 'full' zone walk; by default, ldns-walk will only show the names, and types present at those names. If this option is given,
all resource records will be printed.
-s name
Start the walk with this owner name. Useful when continuing the walk for a large zone.
@ nameserver
Send the queries to this nameserver.
BUGS
The full zone walk function is not complete yet, it does not correctly print delegation records
AUTHOR
Written by Jelte Jansen as an example for ldns usage.
REPORTING BUGS
Report bugs to <ldns-team@nlnetlabs.nl>.
COPYRIGHT
Copyright (C) 2005 NLnet Labs. This is free software. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PUR-
POSE.
21 Nov 2005 ldns-walk(1)