11-26-2013
SMC broken
Hi All, Had same problem. Traced mine to a Java patch as well.
I had 125136-46 . Mine broke when I applied 125136-60.
As soon as I backed out, all was good.
7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
We changed our root password on one of our Master NIS machines. We tried going into the SMC after the password change and it keeps failing for root login. I can login to the server via the root account. Just cannot open the SMC with the root account. This user is required to manage the users. ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: buckhtr77
2 Replies
2. Solaris
When I start SMC
IT still doesnot work .It still remain configuration and don't change to welcome screen
Please help me :mad: (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: iwbasts
1 Replies
3. Solaris
After I run Jass , I can bring up the SMC GUI, but it wont let me log in as root. It works without Jass being run. Does anyone know what in Jass disables this. I have tried removing some things from jass like remote-root-login to no avail.
Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
I ram running... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: garydeena
0 Replies
4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello,
I've a Solaris 10.
When I attemp to run SMC and click somthing there (for example "system information") , an error message is shown on the screen and says me WBEM is not running. (But actually WBEM is working). It says "if WBEM runing, I should stop/start wbem and try again." but I do it... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: XNOR
0 Replies
5. Solaris
I installed the smc and now I'm getting the below error when i try to access it via web.
Apache Tomcat/4.0.5 - HTTP Status 404 - /smconsole.jnlp
The service Apache2 is in maintenance mode and I can't get it online. Can someone help with this please?
Thanks. (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: bbbngowc
5 Replies
6. Solaris
Hello
I recently downloaded and installed the latest patchset for Solaris 10 (update 5) running on SPARC.
Actually I am new to Solaris (I come from Red Hat) and the security department asked me to update the system for security fixes.
I logged in to Oracle support and used the recommended patch... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: abohmeed
3 Replies
7. Solaris
Does anyone know what is going on with Solaris 10 and oracle? I am unable to download any new patchset, says I do not have permissions any longer . I am unable to get a response from them. Reason I ask, is that we had no warning, and company has a contract? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: goya
3 Replies
LEARN ABOUT FREEBSD
shape_patch
SHAPE_PATCH(1) General Commands Manual SHAPE_PATCH(1)
NAME
shape_patch - shapeTools RMS generate patch file
SYNOPSIS
shape patch OLDRELEASE=<name1> NEWRELEASE=<name2> [PATCHFILE=<filename>]
DESCRIPTION
Shape patch generates a patch file for updating $(OLDRELEASE) to $(NEWRELEASE). Both releases are identified by release names associated
with the macros OLD-/NEWRELEASE on the command line. Valid release names are those generated by any of the shape_RMS (pre-)release building
procedures (see shape_releas(1)). Performing 'vl -all' with the release identification file as argument usually gives a good overview of
existing release names. Patch generation happens recursively over all subsystems being part of the current node. Hence, triggering shape
patch from the top node of the central source repository creates a patch file for the whole system.
The output of shape patch is stored in a file named <name1>+2+<name2>.pat. When the PATCHFILE macro is set on the command line, $(PATCH-
FILE) is taken as output file name instead. Defining PATCHFILE=- on the command line causes the patch to be written to standard output.
Note: For patches invoking multiple subsystems, $(PATCHFILE) should be set to an absolute pathname. If not, the patch generation procedure
will leave an equally named patch file for each visited subsystem.
The patch is constructed using the vdiff(1) command and can be applied to any installation of $(OLDRELEASE) by invoking patch(1).
INCONVENIENCES
On System V machines, the generated patch file name will almost certainly exceed the 14 characters filename length limit.
SEE ALSO
shape_releas(1), vdiff(1), patch(1)
FILES
<name1>+2+<name2>.pat
26.9.119 SHAPE_PATCH(1)