Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Script going upward and downward direction Post 302865601 by Don Cragun on Friday 18th of October 2013 11:06:00 PM
Old 10-19-2013
You could try something like:
Code:
#!/bin/ksh
elog="${0##*/}.$$"
awk -v elog="$elog" '
/ IP [[]/ {
        if(match($0, /([[:digit:]]+[.]){3}[[:digit:]]+/))
                ip = substr($0, RSTART, RLENGTH)
        else {  printf("IP address not found in line \"%s\"\n", $0) > elog
                ec = 1
        }
        next
}       
/found in User Database/ {
        ip = ""
}
/not in the User Database/ {
        if(match($0, /Username [[][^]]*/) == 0) {
                printf("Username not found in line \"%s\"\n", $0) > elog
                ec = 1
        } else {un = substr($0, RSTART + 10, RLENGTH - 10)
                printf("%s %s\n", un, ip)
        }       
        ip = un = ""
}       
END {   exit ec
}' log
ec=$?
if [ $ec -ne 0 ]
then    cat "$elog" >&2
        rm "$elog"
fi      
exit $ec

I tested this using the Korn shell, but it should work with any POSIX-conforming shell. If you want to try this on a Solaris/SunOS system, replace awk on the 3rd line in this script with /usr/xpg4/bin/awk, /usr/xpg6/bin/awk, or nawk.

With your sample input, this produces the output:
Code:
myfriend 80.11.22.33
myfriend3 100.11.22.44

which matches what you requested except that there is always one space between output fields (where your sample output had two spaces in the first line and one space in the second line) and there are no trailing spaces (where your sample output had one trailing space on the first line and no trailing spaces on the second output line).
This User Gave Thanks to Don Cragun For This Post:
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

New & could use some direction!

First, I just rebuilt/installed my custom kernel & I don't know how to check if it ran properly (I'm fairly sure it did, but I'm looking for reassurance that it loaded the new kernel file). Second, I'd love to get into programming, scripting, whatever, I want my imagination to be the builder &... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: LazySpoon
2 Replies

2. Programming

In what direction should I take computer programming?

I'm a senior in high school trying to start getting into computer programming. All I've done so far is picked up a book on C for beginners and started to teach myself. There aren't really any courses at my high school for introductory programming, so it looks like I'll have to wait for college to... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: Fritzz
7 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

re-direction

Say I have a single bin directory with Linux and SunOS executables, like this: bin/myprog_lnx bin/myprog_sun Assume these programs read from stdin and write to stdout and, thus, are meant to be run like this: myprog_lnx < filein > fileout My users may log in from a Linux or Solaris... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gsal
3 Replies

4. Programming

Daemon direction. Or, What do I need to watch for?

Hi, I'm writing my first daemon application. I need to make sure I cover my bases as far as correct procedures, etc... I've tried to do my own legwork by reading as much as I could on daemonizing programs, etc... There are so many different examples, some include this but not that, etc...... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mph
3 Replies

5. Fedora

Need Direction for extra work ?

Hey , I have become pretty normal, using unix and what not and working around FEDORA 9 I was wondering does anyone have any IDEAS or have anything I should try to build or scripts to write , or possibly know any sites where I could practice some things just so I know I am writing them... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Producer
2 Replies

6. Fedora

In need of some direction

Okay, so I'm not a complete newb when it comes to using Unix/Linux. I've been using Ubuntu for a few years now and I've dipped my toes into a few other distros but now I want to get a bit serious. I'm looking at becoming a sysadmin but the trouble is...I have no idea where to start. What I'm... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Tamachan87
1 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Displays the text upward

I need to print out text from a file in the console up, you know someone like that? (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: gizmo16
8 Replies

8. AIX

New to aix virtualization direction ?

picked up a 9111-520 p5 hardware recently with 8 Gig of RAM, lots of internal disk space...6 x 140 gig had 7.1 pre-installed, and managed to upgrade the firmware to latest SF240_xxxx goal is to virtualize this and have LPARs running aix 7.1, 6.x, and Rhat for ppc .. need some... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: ppchu99
13 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Search and Destroy Script Direction Help

Being a beginner in scripting I am not sure the direction to take to accomplish the below task and would love suggestions. GOAL input file: domains.list Read input file, search in named.conf and find domain and delete entry for the purpose of cleanup activity. named.conf entry example zone... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: djzah
8 Replies
A2P(1)							 Perl Programmers Reference Guide						    A2P(1)

NAME
a2p - Awk to Perl translator SYNOPSIS
a2p [options] filename DESCRIPTION
A2p takes an awk script specified on the command line (or from standard input) and produces a comparable perl script on the standard out- put. Options Options include: -D<number> sets debugging flags. -F<character> tells a2p that this awk script is always invoked with this -F switch. -n<fieldlist> specifies the names of the input fields if input does not have to be split into an array. If you were translating an awk script that processes the password file, you might say: a2p -7 -nlogin.password.uid.gid.gcos.shell.home Any delimiter can be used to separate the field names. -<number> causes a2p to assume that input will always have that many fields. -o tells a2p to use old awk behavior. The only current differences are: o Old awk always has a line loop, even if there are no line actions, whereas new awk does not. o In old awk, sprintf is extremely greedy about its arguments. For example, given the statement print sprintf(some_args), extra_args; old awk considers extra_args to be arguments to "sprintf"; new awk considers them arguments to "print". "Considerations" A2p cannot do as good a job translating as a human would, but it usually does pretty well. There are some areas where you may want to examine the perl script produced and tweak it some. Here are some of them, in no particular order. There is an awk idiom of putting int() around a string expression to force numeric interpretation, even though the argument is always inte- ger anyway. This is generally unneeded in perl, but a2p can't tell if the argument is always going to be integer, so it leaves it in. You may wish to remove it. Perl differentiates numeric comparison from string comparison. Awk has one operator for both that decides at run time which comparison to do. A2p does not try to do a complete job of awk emulation at this point. Instead it guesses which one you want. It's almost always right, but it can be spoofed. All such guesses are marked with the comment ""#???"". You should go through and check them. You might want to run at least once with the -w switch to perl, which will warn you if you use == where you should have used eq. Perl does not attempt to emulate the behavior of awk in which nonexistent array elements spring into existence simply by being referenced. If somehow you are relying on this mechanism to create null entries for a subsequent for...in, they won't be there in perl. If a2p makes a split line that assigns to a list of variables that looks like (Fld1, Fld2, Fld3...) you may want to rerun a2p using the -n option mentioned above. This will let you name the fields throughout the script. If it splits to an array instead, the script is probably referring to the number of fields somewhere. The exit statement in awk doesn't necessarily exit; it goes to the END block if there is one. Awk scripts that do contortions within the END block to bypass the block under such circumstances can be simplified by removing the conditional in the END block and just exiting directly from the perl script. Perl has two kinds of array, numerically-indexed and associative. Perl associative arrays are called "hashes". Awk arrays are usually translated to hashes, but if you happen to know that the index is always going to be numeric you could change the {...} to [...]. Itera- tion over a hash is done using the keys() function, but iteration over an array is NOT. You might need to modify any loop that iterates over such an array. Awk starts by assuming OFMT has the value %.6g. Perl starts by assuming its equivalent, $#, to have the value %.20g. You'll want to set $# explicitly if you use the default value of OFMT. Near the top of the line loop will be the split operation that is implicit in the awk script. There are times when you can move this down past some conditionals that test the entire record so that the split is not done as often. For aesthetic reasons you may wish to change the array base $[ from 1 back to perl's default of 0, but remember to change all array sub- scripts AND all substr() and index() operations to match. Cute comments that say "# Here is a workaround because awk is dumb" are passed through unmodified. Awk scripts are often embedded in a shell script that pipes stuff into and out of awk. Often the shell script wrapper can be incorporated into the perl script, since perl can start up pipes into and out of itself, and can do other things that awk can't do by itself. Scripts that refer to the special variables RSTART and RLENGTH can often be simplified by referring to the variables $`, $& and $', as long as they are within the scope of the pattern match that sets them. The produced perl script may have subroutines defined to deal with awk's semantics regarding getline and print. Since a2p usually picks correctness over efficiency. it is almost always possible to rewrite such code to be more efficient by discarding the semantic sugar. For efficiency, you may wish to remove the keyword from any return statement that is the last statement executed in a subroutine. A2p catches the most common case, but doesn't analyze embedded blocks for subtler cases. ARGV[0] translates to $ARGV0, but ARGV[n] translates to $ARGV[$n]. A loop that tries to iterate over ARGV[0] won't find it. ENVIRONMENT
A2p uses no environment variables. AUTHOR
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org> FILES
SEE ALSO
perl The perl compiler/interpreter s2p sed to perl translator DIAGNOSTICS
BUGS
It would be possible to emulate awk's behavior in selecting string versus numeric operations at run time by inspection of the operands, but it would be gross and inefficient. Besides, a2p almost always guesses right. Storage for the awk syntax tree is currently static, and can run out. perl v5.8.0 2002-06-01 A2P(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy