Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris Question: # of ldoms on T5240 with 2 T2 US 8 core Post 302862187 by Iftikhar Barrie on Thursday 10th of October 2013 09:13:32 AM
Old 10-10-2013
Thanks.. It's all just in the lab right now. What I have is 64gb of memory. planning to use this as a application and db server. As for the anticipated work loads, I dont know right now. Part of the exercise is to get an idea of the load
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

One Last Question about Core Files (distinguish) URGENT

now, what do you define as core files. there are some files outthere with the name perl.core, I-core.png, core.png I mean, are these classified as core files too??? i thought core files are simply files called "core". Please help me out this is urgent (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: TRUEST
2 Replies

2. Solaris

raidctl on SUN T5240

Setting up a T5240 with two disks c1t0d0 and c1t1d0. I am trying to use raidctl but when I issue. raidctl -l I get Controller 1 Disk: 0.0.0 Disk: 0.1.0 So I try raidctl -c '0.0.0 0.1.0' -r 1 1 and I get "Array in use." I try (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: photon
4 Replies

3. Solaris

cannot plumb nxge on T5240

its a fresh installation. during the OS setup, it did not prompt for IP, netmask and gateway. using Solaris 10 08/07 update 4. I tried to plumb manually but encountered no such interface error. but nxge interfaces can be greped from the /etc/path_to_inst file. getting similar error on... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: incredible
3 Replies

4. Solaris

SUN T5240 vs M3000

Hi, We are planning to buy new server for our data center. Sun T5240 or M3000 which one have better performance, we are going to create many dt sessions in this server. So, i need your suggestions. RJS (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajasekg
4 Replies

5. Solaris

ufsrestore T5240

Hi Friends we have sun T5240 server, we have taken ufsdump of this server remotely with scsi tapedrive, If we need to do ufsrestore means what we have to do, since T5240 has not having scsi port, any procedure is there? Regards Rajasekar (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajasekg
5 Replies

6. Solaris

Disable multithreading option on T5240

Hi Gurus Can any one tell me the process of disabling the multithreading option on T5240 server and my OS is on LDOM, having one physical processor with 8 core & 8 thread per core Regards (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: amity
3 Replies

7. Solaris

Cannot configure RAID on T5240

Hi ! I've been given a T5240 with 4 disks and 2 HBA cards (but no array connected). I did a factory reset on SP and NVRAM clean on OBP because the server had been used before. I boot cdrom in single mode and try to create a hw mirror with disks from c1... but only c2 is seen by raidctl. ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: delavega
2 Replies

8. Solaris

Reducing Cores in T5240 server for meeting Oracle Core Licences

Hi I need to reduce cores on T5240 server for meeting Oracle Core licenses. For that I have install the LDOM packages & run below mention commands. bash-3.2# ldm list-config factory-default config_initial bash-3.2# ldm set-vcpu 32 primary bash-3.2# ldm list-config... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: amity
5 Replies

9. Solaris

Using a Modem on a T5-2 or a T5240

Hi Folks, Just a quick question - hopefully! I have an application currently running on a V890 with Solaris 9, I'd like to move this to either one of our T-5's or one of the T5240's in a Legacy container on an LDOM - but the fly in the ointment is the application still uses a standard Hayes... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gull04
3 Replies
security_load_policy(3) 				     SELinux API documentation					   security_load_policy(3)

NAME
security_load_policy - load a new SELinux policy SYNOPSIS
#include <selinux/selinux.h> int security_load_policy(void *data, size_t len); int selinux_mkload_policy(int preservebools); int selinux_init_load_policy(int *enforce); DESCRIPTION
security_load_policy loads a new policy, returns 0 for success and -1 for error. selinux_mkload_policy makes a policy image and loads it. This function provides a higher level interface for loading policy than secu- rity_load_policy, internally determining the right policy version, locating and opening the policy file, mapping it into memory, manipulat- ing it as needed for current boolean settings and/or local definitions, and then calling security_load_policy to load it. preservebools is a boolean flag indicating whether current policy boolean values should be preserved into the new policy (if 1) or reset to the saved policy settings (if 0). The former case is the default for policy reloads, while the latter case is an option for policy reloads but is primarily used for the initial policy load. selinux_init_load_policy performs the initial policy load. This function determines the desired enforc- ing mode, sets the enforce argument accordingly for the caller to use, sets the SELinux kernel enforcing status to match it, and loads the policy. It also internally handles the initial selinuxfs mount required to perform these actions. It should also be noted that after the initial policy load, the SELinux kernel code cannot anymore be disabled and the selinuxfs cannot be unmounted using a call to security_disable(3). Therefore, after the initial policy load, the only operational changes are those permitted by setenforce(3) (i.e. eventually setting the framework in permissive mode rather than in enforcing one). RETURN VALUE
returns zero on success or -1 on error. AUTHOR
This manual page has been written by Guido Trentalancia <guido@trentalancia.com> SEE ALSO
selinux(8), security_disable(3), setenforce(1) guido@trentalancia.com 3 November 2009 security_load_policy(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy