Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Need program to continue even when encountering errors Post 302852887 by figaro on Thursday 12th of September 2013 02:43:11 PM
Old 09-12-2013
It is good practice to distinguish between errors and warnings.
Errors are situations where - even if the program manages to continue - the results are unreliable if not unusable. You need to have a method of alerting the user or developer that something is wrong and needs to be fixed.
Warnings are situations that the user needs to be alerted to, but may not be detrimental to the quality of the output.
I think you will want to design your program around a definition of what constitutes an error and what a warning.
This User Gave Thanks to figaro For This Post:
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Adapter Errors and Link Errors

$ errpt | more IDENTIFIER TIMESTAMP T C RESOURCE_NAME DESCRIPTION 3074FEB7 0802050205 T H fscsi1 ADAPTER ERROR B8113DD1 0802050205 T H fcs1 LINK ERROR B8113DD1 0802050205 T H fcs1 LINK ERROR 3074FEB7 0802050205 T H fscsi0 ADAPTER ERROR B8113DD1 ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mcastill66
0 Replies

2. AIX

Adapter Errors and Link Errors

$ errpt | more IDENTIFIER TIMESTAMP T C RESOURCE_NAME DESCRIPTION 3074FEB7 0802050205 T H fscsi1 ADAPTER ERROR B8113DD1 0802050205 T H fcs1 LINK ERROR B8113DD1 0802050205 T H fcs1 LINK ERROR 3074FEB7 0802050205 T H fscsi0 ADAPTER ERROR B8113DD1 ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mcastill66
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Major OS errors/Bash errors help!!!!

Hi all, dummy here.... I have major errors on entering the shell. On login I get: -bash: dircolors: command not found -bash: tr: command not found -bash: fgrep: command not found -bash: grep: command not found -bash: grep: command not found -bash: id: command not found -bash: [: =: unary... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: wcmmlynn
12 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

encountering problem with vim

while entering into vim insert mode some garbage is getting printed in to the file could some one help to avoid this . (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Gopi Krishna P
1 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Bypass getopts errors and continue processing?

Is there a way to do this? while getopts "n:g:m:i:p:d:a:" OPTION do case $OPTION in ... if i do a ./script.sh -n john -u user -p password, it will output: name= john ./script.sh: illegal option -- u Is there a way to skip over errors so that -p will get processed as well? By... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: etranman1
7 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Scan a file in realtime and execute certain commands on encountering 5 consecutive identical lines

Mysql log has something like below: I need a bash shell script that will do the following: 1) The script will scan the mysql.log file constantly in real time (something like tail -F mysql.log) 2) If it encounters 5 consecutive identical lines then it would invoke some commands (say... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: proactiveaditya
4 Replies

7. Ubuntu

Encountering problem on upgrading the packages

Hi folks, Ubuntu 9.04 I have an old box not running for years. I just dig it out from the store room. On running; $ sudo aptitude update ...... ...... Err http://hk.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 404 Not Found Err http://hk.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/restricted Packages ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: satimis
1 Replies

8. Homework & Coursework Questions

program to find and print a Fibonacci sequence of numbers. --Errors

Use and complete the template provided. The entire template must be completed. If you don't, your post may be deleted! 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data: I am trying to convert a C language program over to Sparc Assembley and I am getting Undefined first referenced... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: kenjiro310
4 Replies

9. Programming

Please help me understand errors in perl program

co #! /usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use diagnostics; my $amount=""; my $bain; ; my $code=""; my $date;my $day;my $line; my $mo; my $LNUM = 0; my $xyz=""; my $yr; $yr = 2015; my $F; my @F; while (<>) { chop; ++$LNUM; @F = split(';'); if ( $F eq "Date" )... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hpk
1 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Split a file based on encountering header

I need to split a file based on headers found Input file file1 content: ADD john mickey DROP matt sam output of file F1 john mickey output of file F2 matt sam (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Diddy
5 Replies
PERLLEXWARN(1)						 Perl Programmers Reference Guide					    PERLLEXWARN(1)

NAME
perllexwarn - Perl Lexical Warnings DESCRIPTION
The "use warnings" pragma enables to control precisely what warnings are to be enabled in which parts of a Perl program. It's a more flexible alternative for both the command line flag -w and the equivalent Perl variable, $^W. This pragma works just like the "strict" pragma. This means that the scope of the warning pragma is limited to the enclosing block. It also means that the pragma setting will not leak across files (via "use", "require" or "do"). This allows authors to independently define the degree of warning checks that will be applied to their module. By default, optional warnings are disabled, so any legacy code that doesn't attempt to control the warnings will work unchanged. All warnings are enabled in a block by either of these: use warnings; use warnings 'all'; Similarly all warnings are disabled in a block by either of these: no warnings; no warnings 'all'; For example, consider the code below: use warnings; my @a; { no warnings; my $b = @a[0]; } my $c = @a[0]; The code in the enclosing block has warnings enabled, but the inner block has them disabled. In this case that means the assignment to the scalar $c will trip the "Scalar value @a[0] better written as $a[0]" warning, but the assignment to the scalar $b will not. Default Warnings and Optional Warnings Before the introduction of lexical warnings, Perl had two classes of warnings: mandatory and optional. As its name suggests, if your code tripped a mandatory warning, you would get a warning whether you wanted it or not. For example, the code below would always produce an "isn't numeric" warning about the "2:". my $a = "2:" + 3; With the introduction of lexical warnings, mandatory warnings now become default warnings. The difference is that although the previously mandatory warnings are still enabled by default, they can then be subsequently enabled or disabled with the lexical warning pragma. For example, in the code below, an "isn't numeric" warning will only be reported for the $a variable. my $a = "2:" + 3; no warnings; my $b = "2:" + 3; Note that neither the -w flag or the $^W can be used to disable/enable default warnings. They are still mandatory in this case. What's wrong with -w and $^W Although very useful, the big problem with using -w on the command line to enable warnings is that it is all or nothing. Take the typical scenario when you are writing a Perl program. Parts of the code you will write yourself, but it's very likely that you will make use of pre-written Perl modules. If you use the -w flag in this case, you end up enabling warnings in pieces of code that you haven't written. Similarly, using $^W to either disable or enable blocks of code is fundamentally flawed. For a start, say you want to disable warnings in a block of code. You might expect this to be enough to do the trick: { local ($^W) = 0; my $a =+ 2; my $b; chop $b; } When this code is run with the -w flag, a warning will be produced for the $a line: "Reversed += operator". The problem is that Perl has both compile-time and run-time warnings. To disable compile-time warnings you need to rewrite the code like this: { BEGIN { $^W = 0 } my $a =+ 2; my $b; chop $b; } The other big problem with $^W is the way you can inadvertently change the warning setting in unexpected places in your code. For example, when the code below is run (without the -w flag), the second call to "doit" will trip a "Use of uninitialized value" warning, whereas the first will not. sub doit { my $b; chop $b; } doit(); { local ($^W) = 1; doit() } This is a side-effect of $^W being dynamically scoped. Lexical warnings get around these limitations by allowing finer control over where warnings can or can't be tripped. Controlling Warnings from the Command Line There are three Command Line flags that can be used to control when warnings are (or aren't) produced: -w This is the existing flag. If the lexical warnings pragma is not used in any of you code, or any of the modules that you use, this flag will enable warnings everywhere. See "Backward Compatibility" for details of how this flag interacts with lexical warnings. -W If the -W flag is used on the command line, it will enable all warnings throughout the program regardless of whether warnings were disabled locally using "no warnings" or "$^W =0". This includes all files that get included via "use", "require" or "do". Think of it as the Perl equivalent of the "lint" command. -X Does the exact opposite to the -W flag, i.e. it disables all warnings. Backward Compatibility If you are used with working with a version of Perl prior to the introduction of lexically scoped warnings, or have code that uses both lexical warnings and $^W, this section will describe how they interact. How Lexical Warnings interact with -w/$^W: 1. If none of the three command line flags (-w, -W or -X) that control warnings is used and neither $^W or the "warnings" pragma are used, then default warnings will be enabled and optional warnings disabled. This means that legacy code that doesn't attempt to control the warnings will work unchanged. 2. The -w flag just sets the global $^W variable as in 5.005. This means that any legacy code that currently relies on manipulating $^W to control warning behavior will still work as is. 3. Apart from now being a boolean, the $^W variable operates in exactly the same horrible uncontrolled global way, except that it cannot disable/enable default warnings. 4. If a piece of code is under the control of the "warnings" pragma, both the $^W variable and the -w flag will be ignored for the scope of the lexical warning. 5. The only way to override a lexical warnings setting is with the -W or -X command line flags. The combined effect of 3 & 4 is that it will allow code which uses the "warnings" pragma to control the warning behavior of $^W-type code (using a "local $^W=0") if it really wants to, but not vice-versa. Category Hierarchy A hierarchy of "categories" have been defined to allow groups of warnings to be enabled/disabled in isolation. The current hierarchy is: all -+ | +- closure | +- deprecated | +- exiting | +- glob | +- io -----------+ | | | +- closed | | | +- exec | | | +- layer | | | +- newline | | | +- pipe | | | +- unopened | +- imprecision | +- misc | +- numeric | +- once | +- overflow | +- pack | +- portable | +- recursion | +- redefine | +- regexp | +- severe -------+ | | | +- debugging | | | +- inplace | | | +- internal | | | +- malloc | +- signal | +- substr | +- syntax -------+ | | | +- ambiguous | | | +- bareword | | | +- digit | | | +- illegalproto | | | +- parenthesis | | | +- precedence | | | +- printf | | | +- prototype | | | +- qw | | | +- reserved | | | +- semicolon | +- taint | +- threads | +- uninitialized | +- unpack | +- untie | +- utf8 | +- void Just like the "strict" pragma any of these categories can be combined use warnings qw(void redefine); no warnings qw(io syntax untie); Also like the "strict" pragma, if there is more than one instance of the "warnings" pragma in a given scope the cumulative effect is additive. use warnings qw(void); # only "void" warnings enabled ... use warnings qw(io); # only "void" & "io" warnings enabled ... no warnings qw(void); # only "io" warnings enabled To determine which category a specific warning has been assigned to see perldiag. Note: In Perl 5.6.1, the lexical warnings category "deprecated" was a sub-category of the "syntax" category. It is now a top-level category in its own right. Fatal Warnings The presence of the word "FATAL" in the category list will escalate any warnings detected from the categories specified in the lexical scope into fatal errors. In the code below, the use of "time", "length" and "join" can all produce a "Useless use of xxx in void context" warning. use warnings; time; { use warnings FATAL => qw(void); length "abc"; } join "", 1,2,3; print "done "; When run it produces this output Useless use of time in void context at fatal line 3. Useless use of length in void context at fatal line 7. The scope where "length" is used has escalated the "void" warnings category into a fatal error, so the program terminates immediately it encounters the warning. To explicitly turn off a "FATAL" warning you just disable the warning it is associated with. So, for example, to disable the "void" warning in the example above, either of these will do the trick: no warnings qw(void); no warnings FATAL => qw(void); If you want to downgrade a warning that has been escalated into a fatal error back to a normal warning, you can use the "NONFATAL" keyword. For example, the code below will promote all warnings into fatal errors, except for those in the "syntax" category. use warnings FATAL => 'all', NONFATAL => 'syntax'; Reporting Warnings from a Module The "warnings" pragma provides a number of functions that are useful for module authors. These are used when you want to report a module- specific warning to a calling module has enabled warnings via the "warnings" pragma. Consider the module "MyMod::Abc" below. package MyMod::Abc; use warnings::register; sub open { my $path = shift; if ($path !~ m#^/#) { warnings::warn("changing relative path to /var/abc") if warnings::enabled(); $path = "/var/abc/$path"; } } 1; The call to "warnings::register" will create a new warnings category called "MyMod::Abc", i.e. the new category name matches the current package name. The "open" function in the module will display a warning message if it gets given a relative path as a parameter. This warnings will only be displayed if the code that uses "MyMod::Abc" has actually enabled them with the "warnings" pragma like below. use MyMod::Abc; use warnings 'MyMod::Abc'; ... abc::open("../fred.txt"); It is also possible to test whether the pre-defined warnings categories are set in the calling module with the "warnings::enabled" function. Consider this snippet of code: package MyMod::Abc; sub open { warnings::warnif("deprecated", "open is deprecated, use new instead"); new(@_); } sub new ... 1; The function "open" has been deprecated, so code has been included to display a warning message whenever the calling module has (at least) the "deprecated" warnings category enabled. Something like this, say. use warnings 'deprecated'; use MyMod::Abc; ... MyMod::Abc::open($filename); Either the "warnings::warn" or "warnings::warnif" function should be used to actually display the warnings message. This is because they can make use of the feature that allows warnings to be escalated into fatal errors. So in this case use MyMod::Abc; use warnings FATAL => 'MyMod::Abc'; ... MyMod::Abc::open('../fred.txt'); the "warnings::warnif" function will detect this and die after displaying the warning message. The three warnings functions, "warnings::warn", "warnings::warnif" and "warnings::enabled" can optionally take an object reference in place of a category name. In this case the functions will use the class name of the object as the warnings category. Consider this example: package Original; no warnings; use warnings::register; sub new { my $class = shift; bless [], $class; } sub check { my $self = shift; my $value = shift; if ($value % 2 && warnings::enabled($self)) { warnings::warn($self, "Odd numbers are unsafe") } } sub doit { my $self = shift; my $value = shift; $self->check($value); # ... } 1; package Derived; use warnings::register; use Original; our @ISA = qw( Original ); sub new { my $class = shift; bless [], $class; } 1; The code below makes use of both modules, but it only enables warnings from "Derived". use Original; use Derived; use warnings 'Derived'; my $a = Original->new(); $a->doit(1); my $b = Derived->new(); $a->doit(1); When this code is run only the "Derived" object, $b, will generate a warning. Odd numbers are unsafe at main.pl line 7 Notice also that the warning is reported at the line where the object is first used. SEE ALSO
warnings, perldiag. AUTHOR
Paul Marquess perl v5.12.1 2010-04-26 PERLLEXWARN(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy