09-09-2013
No worry! I should have dove into C 15 years ago, and now I realize C is so important for programming!
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Programming
Hi all,
I am trying to create a function that return an array of integer based on the char parameter pass into the function. I.e.
func_a(char * str)
{
example str is equal to "1,2,3,4"
return an array of integers of 1,2,3,4
}
Please advise
regards
dwgi32 (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dwgi32
2 Replies
2. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi experts,
How to get the length of an Array in PERL.
for eg., @Var having 5 elements.
regards
Anent (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: anent
5 Replies
3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hello. I'm working on a project that involves creating public/private keys server-side using openssl and using the public key in a Javascript application to encrypt sensitive data in form fields before transmission to the server. Using an SSL https server connection was not an option in this... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jhopper
1 Replies
4. Shell Programming and Scripting
I need to implement the following logic and need some expert help from UNIX community.
These are the steps in my Shell script.
1. Analyze a file.
2. Extract all the ID's in that file.
3. Use the ID's from #2 to run another filter on the file.
I've implemented # 1 and 2 using... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: katwala
3 Replies
5. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi !
I'm looking for a way to transform certain floating point numbers in a one-line, variable length file to integers.
I can do this in a crude way with sed :
sed -e 's/0\.\(\):/\1:/g' -e 's/0\.0\(\):/\1:/g' -e 's/1\.000:/100:/g' myfile ... but this doesn't handle the rounding correctly.
... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jossojjos
3 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
As Brendan O'Conner writes in this blog, mawk is near 8 times faster than gawk, so I am going to give mawk a go, but I got errors when trying to print the length of an array in mawk using length() function, is it not supported in mawk? or there's another way to get the length of an array in mawk?
... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: kevintse
3 Replies
7. Shell Programming and Scripting
I would be grateful if someone could help me. I am trying to write a .sh script in UNIX.
I have the following code;
User=john
User=james
User=ian
User=martin
for x in ${User}
do
print ${#x}
done
This produces the following output;
4
5
3
6 (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: mmab
12 Replies
8. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hello All,
I have this script that does stuff like "starting, stopping & restarting" a Daemon Process running on my machine...
My main question is why in part of my code (which you will see below) does the Array Length (i.e. ${#PIDS} )
return "1" when I know the Array is empty..?
Here is... (17 Replies)
Discussion started by: mrm5102
17 Replies
9. Shell Programming and Scripting
Does anyone know how to find length of multi dimension array
of following type
A Afor simple array I is to do
for (i in A)n++ to find length of array but if it is multi dimension how to find the length ? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: nex_asp
2 Replies
10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers
Hi there,
I'm listing files and sorting them. When I try to get length of array variable in which these files are stored I get 1 as value. That's weird.
files_info="$(find $input_dir -name "*_CHR$i.info" | sort )"
printf ${#files_info}"\n" #print length
#--loop through... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: genome
6 Replies
TIME(2) Linux Programmer's Manual TIME(2)
NAME
time - get time in seconds
SYNOPSIS
#include <time.h>
time_t time(time_t *t);
DESCRIPTION
time() returns the time as the number of seconds since the Epoch, 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 (UTC).
If t is non-NULL, the return value is also stored in the memory pointed to by t.
RETURN VALUE
On success, the value of time in seconds since the Epoch is returned. On error, ((time_t) -1) is returned, and errno is set appropriately.
ERRORS
EFAULT t points outside your accessible address space.
CONFORMING TO
SVr4, 4.3BSD, C89, C99, POSIX.1-2001. POSIX does not specify any error conditions.
NOTES
POSIX.1 defines seconds since the Epoch using a formula that approximates the number of seconds between a specified time and the Epoch.
This formula takes account of the facts that all years that are evenly divisible by 4 are leap years, but years that are evenly divisible
by 100 are not leap years unless they are also evenly divisible by 400, in which case they are leap years. This value is not the same as
the actual number of seconds between the time and the Epoch, because of leap seconds and because system clocks are not required to be syn-
chronized to a standard reference. The intention is that the interpretation of seconds since the Epoch values be consistent; see
POSIX.1-2008 Rationale A.4.15 for further rationale.
SEE ALSO
date(1), gettimeofday(2), ctime(3), ftime(3), time(7)
COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.44 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can
be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
Linux 2011-09-09 TIME(2)