Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Print only processes running for more than 24 hours Post 302850923 by anil510 on Friday 6th of September 2013 04:25:59 AM
Old 09-06-2013
Jotne,

Thanks, but not getting correct result.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

How do you print the number of processes that each user is currently running in Unix?

Ok, so I know there's a way to do this, but I've been trying to find out all afternoon with no luck. I think it should print out something like this: 1 bin 2 daemon 6 duo Where the numbers on the left are the number of processes being run by the user whose name is listed on the right. Is... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Duo11
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Capture running process for 2 hours with an interval of 10 sec

Hi, Can any one help me on this. How to capture the running process for two hours with an interval of 10 sec. Thanks in andvance Double post, continued here, thread closed (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: sarathkumar
0 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Capture running process or 2 hours with an interval of 10 sec

Hi, Can any one help me on this. How to capture the running process for two hours with an interval of 10 sec. Thanks in andvance (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sarathkumar
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Capture the running process for 2 hours

Hi, How can i capture the running process for 2 hours. Thanks in advance.:b: (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sarathkumar
1 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

List of Running Jobs In Last 4 Hours

Hi Experts, Please help me in this. I am trying this code on AIX 5.3. I need list of jobs that executed in last 4 hours. I have a schedule on this script - cron executes it and sends mail to me for every 2 hours. I have a Job time and have around 100 jobs those execute daily. What all i need... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajubollas
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

find the no of processes that ran 2 hours before or earlier

Is there a way to find out the total no of processes that were running ? - 2 or 3 hours before - list those no of processes (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jansat
3 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

At command not running out of hours

Hi All, new to the forum and new to Unix but I have an issue which is annoying on a new level. I have included a short and full version for anyone needing more information. Short Version I am running a set of scripts that work and run fine. one of the scripts arranges the first... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Delboy4000
4 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Can anyone help me to print UNIX epoch time to days,hours,min,sec ?

I have unix epoch time 1441678454803, Can you please help me to print this time in below format ? DAY,HOUR,MIN,SEC Appreciate your help!!! Thanks, Prince (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: prince1987
7 Replies

9. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

How to display processes which have been running for more than a X hours?

Hi, Is it possible to display processes which have been running for more than a 5hrs using a variation of the ps -ef command? Regards, Manny (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: mantas44
5 Replies

10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

How to check the processes running longer than 2 hours.?

HI can someone help me to check the process running more than 2 hours. I have the below command which shows the time and process id, however, I only need the processes running more than 2 hours. (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vinod
8 Replies
Context::Preserve(3)					User Contributed Perl Documentation				      Context::Preserve(3)

NAME
Context::Preserve - run code after a subroutine call, preserving the context the subroutine would have seen if it were the last statement in the caller SYNOPSIS
Have you ever written this? my ($result, @result); # run a sub in the correct context if(!defined wantarray){ some::code(); } elsif(wantarray){ @result = some::code(); } else { $result = some::code(); } # do something after some::code $_ += 42 for (@result, $result); # finally return the correct value if(!defined wantarray){ return; } elsif(wantarray){ return @result; } else { return $result; } Now you can just write this instead: use Context::Preserve; return preserve_context { some::code() } after => sub { $_ += 42 for @_ }; DESCRIPTION
Sometimes you need to call a function, get the results, act on the results, then return the result of the function. This is painful because of contexts; the original function can behave different if it's called in void, scalar, or list context. You can ignore the various cases and just pick one, but that's fragile. To do things right, you need to see which case you're being called in, and then call the function in that context. This results in 3 code paths, which is a pain to type in (and maintain). This module automates the process. You provide a coderef that is the "original function", and another coderef to run after the original runs. You can modify the return value (aliased to @_) here, and do whatever else you need to do. "wantarray" is correct inside both coderefs; in "after", though, the return value is ignored and the value "wantarray" returns is related to the context that the original function was called in. EXPORT
"preserve_context" FUNCTIONS
preserve_context { original } [after|replace] => sub { after } Invokes "original" in the same context as "preserve_context" was called in, save the results, runs "after" in the same context, then returns the result of "original" (or "after" if "replace" is used). If the second argument is "after", then you can modify @_ to affect the return value. "after"'s return value is ignored. If the second argument is "replace", then modifying @_ doesn't do anything. The return value of "after" is returned from "preserve_context" instead. Run "preserve_context" like this: sub whatever { ... return preserve_context { orginal_function() } after => sub { modify @_ }; } or sub whatever { ... return preserve_context { orginal_function() } replace => sub { return @new_return }; } Note that there's no comma between the first block and the "after =>" part. This is how perl parses functions with the "(&@)" prototype. The alternative is to say: preserve_context(sub { original }, after => sub { after }); You can pick the one you like, but I think the first version is much prettier. AUTHOR AND COPYRIGHT
Jonathan Rockway "<jrockway@cpan.org>" Copyright (c) 2008 Infinity Interactive. You may redistribute this module under the same terms as Perl itself. perl v5.18.2 2008-01-15 Context::Preserve(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy