Sponsored Content
The Lounge War Stories Prize of being an Admin - Part 2 Post 302839679 by rbatte1 on Friday 2nd of August 2013 09:13:40 AM
Old 08-02-2013
Windows Standards? Unix Standards? Coding Standards? Scheduler Standards? We've got loads of each. Take your pick.

New project? New Standards. It's called strategy apparently. More like flavour of the month and depending who is on the team.

Anyway, surely to count to five you would:-
  • 0
  • 1
  • 10
  • 11
  • 100
  • 101
...or am I just really sad?




Robin
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

comparing part of header with part of detailed records.

Hi there, I am lil confused with the following issue. I have a File, which has the following header: IMSHRATE_043008_101016 a sample detailed record is :9820101 A982005000CAVG030108000000000000010169000MAR 2008 9820102 MAR 2008 D030108 ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cmaroju
1 Replies

2. What is on Your Mind?

Windows Admin switching to *nix Admin

I'm currently a Windows admin and have wanted to jump ship to the *nix side for a while now. I've been studying both through an lpic level 1 manual as I have time (focusing on debian), and a solaris 10 cert book. The problem is I only have a handful of hours a week to study, and my current job... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: bobwilson
3 Replies

3. War Stories

Prize of being an Admin

Was wondering if anyone has come across any situation where you do your best to help users and in return you get a nice escalation from top level management! Here's my story: One fine morning, I was sitting idle, doing next to nothing, I got an alert from helpdesk people about a problem with... (30 Replies)
Discussion started by: admin_xor
30 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

[Solved] Printing a part of the last line of the specific part of a file

Hi, I have 80 large files, from which I want to get a specific value to run a Bash script. Firstly, I want to get the part of a file which contains this: Name =A xxxxxx yyyyyy zzzzzz aaaaaa bbbbbb Value = 57 This is necessary because in a file there are written more lines which... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: wenclu
6 Replies

5. What is on Your Mind?

Regarding Admin life either as DBA or UNIX Linux admin

I am planning to choose my career as Unix/Linux Admin or a DBA. But I have come to know from forums and few admins like the job will be 24/7. I have few questions on that. Can we get "DAY" shifts in any one of the admin Job ? Can't we have shift timings in any company ? Eventhough the... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: Jacktts
7 Replies

6. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

How to make a loop to read the input from a file part by part?

Hi All, We've a VDI infrastructure in AWS (AWS workspaces) and we're planning to automate the process of provisioning workspaces. Instead of going to GUI console, and launching workspaces by selecting individual users is little time consuming. Thus, I want to create them in bunches from AWS CLI... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: arun_adm
6 Replies
gd_rewrite_fragment(3)						      GETDATA						    gd_rewrite_fragment(3)

NAME
gd_rewrite_fragment -- re-write a dirfile format specification fragment SYNOPSIS
#include <getdata.h> int gd_rewrite_fragment(DIRFILE *dirfile, int fragment); DESCRIPTION
The gd_rewrite_fragment() writes the format specification fragment specified by fragment to disk, regardless of whether it has changed or not, overwriting the existing file. In addition to being simply a valid fragment index, fragment may also be the special value GD_ALL_FRAGMENTS, which indicates that all frag- ments should be rewritten. Metadata is written to disk using the current Standards Version as stored in the dirfile object. See gd_dirfile_standards(3) to change or report the current Standards Version. If the dirfile metadata conforms to no known Standards Version, a Standards non-compliant fragment will be written. RETURN VALUE
On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned and the dirfile error is set to a non-zero error value. Possible error values are: GD_E_ACCMODE The supplied dirfile was opened in read-only mode. GD_E_BAD_DIRFILE The supplied dirfile was invalid. GD_E_BAD_INDEX The supplied fragment index was out of range. GD_E_FLUSH A temporary file could not be opened into which to write the modified metadata, or renaming the temporary file over the original fragment failed. GD_E_INTERNAL_ERROR An internal error occurred in the library while trying to perform the task. This indicates a bug in the library. Please report the incident to the maintainer. The dirfile error may be retrieved by calling gd_error(3). A descriptive error string for the last error encountered can be obtained from a call to gd_error_string(3). BUGS
When writing metadata using Standards Version 4 or earlier, the reference field may change, owing to the lack of a /REFERENCE directive. A work-around is to upgrade to Standards Version 5 or later. SEE ALSO
gd_open(3), gd_close(3), gd_dirfile_standards(3), gd_error(3), gd_error_string(3), gd_flush(3), gd_metaflush(3) Version 0.7.2 22 March 2011 gd_rewrite_fragment(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy