Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Poor performance on an M3000
Operating Systems Solaris Poor performance on an M3000 Post 302836699 by DustinT on Wednesday 24th of July 2013 02:13:08 PM
Old 07-24-2013
I agree with Jill, one Oracle DB in 8g ram is pushing it, much less two running different versions of the Oracle DB. I didn't think you could get an m3000 with 8g ram anyway, are you somehow zoning this server to share the resources or has someone replaced the ram with a smaller amount?
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Samba on E3500 Poor Performance!!!

Hi you all, I have a BIG performance problem on an Sun E3500, the scenario is described below: I have several users (30) accessing via samba to the E3500 using an application built on Visual Foxpro from their Windows PC , the problem is that the first guy that logs in demands 30% of the E3500... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: alex blanco
2 Replies

2. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Poor read performance on sun storedge a1000

Hello, i have a a1000 connected to an e6500. There's a raid 10 (12 disks) on the a1000. If i do a dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/1 bs=1024k count=1000 and then look at iostat it tells me there's a kw/s of 25000. But if i do a dd of=/dev/zero if=/mnt/1 bs=1024k count=1000 then i see only a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mbrenner
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

poor performance processing file with awk

Hello, I'm running a script on AIX to process lines in a file. I need to enclose the second column in quotation marks and write each line to a new file. I've come up with the following: #!/bin/ksh filename=$1 exec >> $filename.new cat $filename | while read LINE do echo $LINE | awk... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: scooter53080
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

HW Raid poor io performance

Hello all We just built a storage cluster for our new xenserver farm. Using 3ware 9650SE raid controllers with 8 x 1TB WD sata disks in a raid 5, 256KB stripe size. While making first performance test on the local storage server using dd (which simulates the read/write access to the disk... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: roli8200
1 Replies

5. Solaris

Poor Disk performance on ZFS

Hello, we have a machine with Solaris Express 11, 2 LSI 9211 8i SAS 2 controllers (multipath to disks), multiport backplane, 16 Seagate Cheetah 15K RPM disks. Each disk has a sequential performance of 220/230 MB/s and in fact if I do a dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rdsk/<diskID_1> bs=1024k... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: golemico
1 Replies

6. Solaris

Poor disk performance however no sign of failure

Hello guys, I have two servers performing the same disk operations. I believe one server is having a disk's impending failure however I have no hard evidence to prove it. This is a pair of Netra 210's with 2 drives in a hardware raid mirror (LSI raid controller). While performing intensive... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: s ladd
4 Replies

7. AIX

Poor Performance of server

Hi, I am new registered user here in this UNIX forums. I am a new system administrator for AIX 6.1. One of our servers performs poorly every time our application (FINACLE) runs many processes/instances. (see below for topas snapshot) I use NMON or Topas to monitor the server utilization. I... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: guzzelle
9 Replies

8. AIX

ISCSI poor performance 1.5MB/s fresh install AIX7.1

Hi Everyone, I have been struggling for few days with iSCSI and thought I could get some help on the forum... fresh install of AIX7.1 TL4 on Power 710, The rootvg relies on 3 SAS disks in RAID 0, 32GB Memory The lpar Profile is using all of the managed system's resources. I have connected... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: frenchy59
11 Replies

9. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

Poor Windows 10 Performance of Parallels Desktop 15 on macOS Catalina

Just a quick note for macOS users. I just installed (and removed) Parallels Desktop 15 Edition on my MacPro (2013) with 64GB memory and 12-cores, which is running the latest version of macOS Catalina as of this post. The reason for this install was to test some RIGOL test gear software which... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
6 Replies
PACKAGE(1)						      General Commands Manual							PACKAGE(1)

NAME
package - register package user via mailagent SYNOPSIS
package address system version patchlevel [ mailpatches | notifypatches ] DESCRIPTION
This command is not intended to be run directly by a user, but may appear in any mail whose subject is set to Command. Such mail will be processed by the mailagent(1), which will extract all lines beginning with @SH, which may specify this command. The mailagent first sets environment variables that will be used by the command. Package is used to notify the author of a package about its users. It is normally generated automatically by the MailAuthor.U unit when the user runs Configure. If the patchlevel specified is not the latest for that system and version, mail is immediately sent suggesting that they upgrade and remindng them how to request the latest patches. The final parameter, if included may be set to mailpatches to specify that the user would like to have future patches mailed to them, or notifypatches to specify that a mail notification of future patches should be sent, rather than the entire patch. The user's address and notification request are saved in the file users in the package's directory. Package performs an approximate address match in order to avoid duplicate entries. Whenever this elimination occurs, a warning message is issued in the logfile. Two addresses will be said equivalent if one of them has an added machine name or if they are really equal. There- fore, the following addresses are equivalent: ram@acri.fr ram@main.acri.fr whereas the following two are not equivalent, unfortunately: ram@acri.acri.fr ram@main.acri.fr When a user is asking to be left alone, it is important to let him know if the request failed, because he will be annoyed when the next set of patches is issued and he still gets them despite his previous request. Therefore, if no approximate match occurs, a warning message is sent back, with a list of addresses that are close to his own e-mail address, but not equivalent. Fortunately, the following addresses are considered close: ram@acri.fr ram@somewhere.com raphael@main.acri.fr manfredi@acri.acri.fr because they either have the same login (important when someone changes company) or share the same domain or sub-domain part. In order to edit the users file, the edusers script should be used. For one thing, it will let you edit the users file from whatever pack- age you name in the command line, but it will also properly lock the file so that the execution of package will stall for the duration of the manual edition (provided you have a strict locking policy defined in your ~/.mailagent configuration file). FORWARDING
Package supports command forwarding as described in the mailhelp(1) page. FILES
~/.mailagent configuration file for mailagent. System/users list of users of that system. This file consists of single line records, one for each registered user. Each record consists of three tab-separated fields. The first field indicates the level of updates requested by the user by a single letter as follows: M Mail future patches directly to the user when they are issued. N Notify the user of future patches. U The users chose to let the author know that they have tried the program, but does not wish to know about future updates. L The user is no longer interested in the program and wants to be left alone. The second field is their last notified patch level, or a dash (-) if it is not known. The third field is the user's Email address. Log/agentlog mailagent's log file AUTHORS
Graham Stoney <greyham@research.canon.oz.au> Raphael Manfredi <Raphael_Manfredi@pobox.com> (minor enhancements) SEE ALSO
edusers(1), mailagent(1), metaconfig(1). PACKAGE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy