update. oddly nothing show up in the logs so I created a completely different iptables ruleset using Easy Firewall Generator for iptables
with these basic rule set:
and I still cannot communicate but with only certain ips within my LAN:
From my firewall:
Code:
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-06-27 15:04 EDT
Initiating ARP Ping Scan at 15:04
Scanning 192.168.3.0 [1 port]
Completed ARP Ping Scan at 15:04, 0.42s elapsed (1 total hosts)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.0 [host down]
Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 15:04
Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 15:04, 0.03s elapsed
Initiating ARP Ping Scan at 15:04
Scanning 30 hosts [1 port/host]
Completed ARP Ping Scan at 15:04, 1.35s elapsed (30 total hosts)
Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 30 hosts. at 15:04
Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 30 hosts. at 15:04, 0.04s elapsed
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.2 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.3 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.4 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.5 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.6 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.7 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.8 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.9 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.10 [host down]
Initiating Connect Scan at 15:04
Scanning 192.168.3.1 [1 port]
Completed Connect Scan at 15:04, 0.00s elapsed (1 total ports)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.1
Host is up (0.00013s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp closed http
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.12 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.13 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.15 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.16 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.17 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.19 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.21 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.22 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.23 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.24 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.25 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.26 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.27 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.28 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.29 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.30 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.31 [host down]
Initiating Connect Scan at 15:04
Scanning 4 hosts [1 port/host]
Discovered open port 80/tcp on 192.168.3.20
Completed Connect Scan at 15:04, 0.00s elapsed (4 total ports)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.11
Host is up (0.00068s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp closed http
MAC Address: 02:03:05:CD:06:04 (ZyXEL Communications)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.14
Host is up (0.32s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp closed http
MAC Address: A9:54:C2:0B:D1:70 (Unknown)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.18
Host is up (0.41s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp closed http
MAC Address: C8:32:CA:DF:1B:79 (Unknown)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.20
Host is up (0.25s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
MAC Address: 7C:DD:90:39:65:3C (Unknown)
Read data files from: /usr/share/nmap
Nmap done: 32 IP addresses (5 hosts up) scanned in 1.96 seconds
Raw packets sent: 61 (1.708KB) | Rcvd: 7 (196B)
and from a laptop within my LAN:
Code:
Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-06-27 15:04 EDT
Initiating ARP Ping Scan at 15:04
Scanning 14 hosts [1 port/host]
Completed ARP Ping Scan at 15:04, 0.43s elapsed (14 total hosts)
Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 14 hosts. at 15:04
Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 14 hosts. at 15:04, 0.03s elapsed
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.0 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.2 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.3 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.4 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.5 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.6 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.7 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.8 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.9 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.10 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.12 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.13 [host down]
Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 15:04
Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 15:04, 0.02s elapsed
Initiating Connect Scan at 15:04
Scanning 2 hosts [1 port/host]
Completed Connect Scan at 15:04, 0.00s elapsed (2 total ports)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.1
Host is up (0.0038s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp closed http
MAC Address: 00:19:5B:69:C3:B1 (D-Link)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.11
Host is up (0.0020s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp closed http
MAC Address: 02:03:05:CD:06:04 (ZyXEL Communications)
Initiating ARP Ping Scan at 15:04
Scanning 17 hosts [1 port/host]
Completed ARP Ping Scan at 15:04, 0.81s elapsed (17 total hosts)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.15 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.16 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.17 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.18 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.19 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.20 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.21 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.22 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.23 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.24 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.25 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.26 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.27 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.28 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.29 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.30 [host down]
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.31 [host down]
Initiating Connect Scan at 15:04
Scanning 192.168.3.14 [1 port]
Completed Connect Scan at 15:04, 0.00s elapsed (1 total ports)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.3.14
Host is up (0.00015s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp closed http
Read data files from: /usr/bin/../share/nmap
Nmap done: 32 IP addresses (3 hosts up) scanned in 1.36 seconds
Raw packets sent: 60 (1.680KB) | Rcvd: 2 (56B)
Hello again !
Thanks for response of my first question. there is my second quesiton why i have local.profile instead of .profile file ?
my all files in pwd shoes local. before any file.
is anybody can tell me about that ?
Thanks
Abid Malik (5 Replies)
Hey!
Iam going to set up a bigger LAN.Server have 4 network adapters.
-----------*0----------
| |
| |
----*1-----*2-----*3-
Network adapret *0 will be for DSL,
*1 for like 30 computers windows xp installed on,*1 will have to... (1 Reply)
Hi,
We have a website running on a local centos 5.4 surfer, static IP.
The domain.com uses no-ip.com to take care of the DNS, it forwards all to my server.
My router receives the port 80 call, routes it to my server and the world can see domain.com perfectly fine.
However, we cannot see... (3 Replies)
Hi Friends,
I have this script for ftping files from AIX server to local windows xp.
#!/bin/sh
HOST='localsystem.net'
USER='myid_onlocal'
PASSWD='mypwd_onlocal'
FILE='file.txt' ##This is a file on server(AIX)
ftp -n $HOST <<END_SCRIPT
quote USER $USER
quote PASS $PASSWD
put $FILE... (1 Reply)
I am facing strange problem regarding hostname on my Linux(2.6.18-164.el5xen x86_64 GNU/Linux), the hostname changes if reboot with lan cable and with NO lan cable
Reboot with lan cable:
The hostname is ubunut
Unable to connect Oracle database using sqlplus some times database is not... (2 Replies)
hi guys
suse 11 SP1 x64
I have a server (4 NIC ports 192.168.100.100-103) that connects point to point to a storage device (same thing 4 ports 192.168.110.100-113) but this server connects to normal LAN 10.6.100.x - gateway 10.6.100.1
the issue is when testing connectivity to the storage... (7 Replies)
Hello
I'm beginner in the linux scripting and i would like to get help. I want to create a script that can block one or more Port even see all the TCP port. The ports must be blocked even when starting my machine.
Of course requires a second script which will allow the ports that you want to... (0 Replies)
I want to SSH to 192.168.1.15 Server from my machine, my ip was 192.168.1.99
Source Destination was UP, with IP 192.168.1.15.
This is LAN Network there are 30 Machine's Connected to the network and working fine, I'm Playing around the local machine's because I need to apply the same rules in... (2 Replies)
Hello,
Recently I discovered an issue with packet routing in the latest Android releases (4.4+ KitKat & Lollipop).
It seems that the problem Android specific, but essentially it comes from the Linux kernel.
I already filed a bug report to Google. You can see the details by searching for... (0 Replies)
06-27-2013