Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Pointer arithmetic for list of strings Post 302812099 by tornow on Saturday 25th of May 2013 02:04:47 AM
Old 05-25-2013
Pointer arithmetic for list of strings

When i want to use a list of strings
Code:
char *list[];

i never understand it well.

Here is an easy example. It took me long to figure it out, searching the web didn't help much:
Code:
#include <stdio.h>


int main(void)
{
        char *list[] = {"foo", "bar", "baz"};
        char **pl;
        int len = sizeof(list)/sizeof(&list);
        int i = 0;


        for (pl = list; i < len; i++) {
                printf("%s\n", *pl++);
        }

        /*segfault after baz 
        while ( *pl ) {
                printf("%s\n", *pl++); 
        }
       */

        /*      
        for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
                printf("%s\n", list[i]); 
        }

        */

        return 0;
}
~

1) I don't understand why the size of len is computed that way.
2) If i loop with while over list instead of pl, i get a error complaining an lvalue would be required.
3) I would prefer to use pointer arithmetic, but i never get it sorted. If i use the index i instead it works

Thanks for explanations or a link where it is explained with examples.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

pass a pointer-to-pointer, or return a pointer?

If one wants to get a start address of a array or a string or a block of memory via a function, there are at least two methods to achieve it: (1) one is to pass a pointer-to-pointer parameter, like: int my_malloc(int size, char **pmem) { *pmem=(char *)malloc(size); if(*pmem==NULL)... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: aaronwong
11 Replies

2. Programming

pointer arithmetic vs. strlen() & strnlen()?

I have been getting some flack recently for my use of strlen() and strnlen(). Honestly I have always just taken their functionality for granted as being the easiest way of getting the length of a string. Is it really so much better to do pointer arithmetic? What am I gaining besides more... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jjinno
3 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

ksh-script "arithmetic syntax error" comparing strings

Hi all, Iīve already searched the forum but canīt find what i am doing wrong. I am trying to compare two variables using ksh under red hat. The error I get is: -ksh: .: MDA=`md5sum /tmp/ftp_dir_after_transfer | cut -d' ' -f1 ` MDB=`md5sum /tmp/ftp_dir_before_transfer | cut -d' ' -f1 `... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: old_mike
3 Replies

4. Programming

linked list node with pointer to struct

Suppose to have: struct Tstudent { string name, surname; int matriculation_num; }; struct Tnode { Tstudent* student; Tnodo* next; } L;I want to deference that "student" pointer. For example, I tried with: *(L->student).matriculation_numbut it not worked, as terminal... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Luke Bonham
4 Replies

5. Programming

Pointer Arithmetic In C

I have a fundamental question on C pointer arithmetry.. Suppose i have a c string pointer already pointing to a valid location, Can I just do a charptr = charptr +1; to get to the next location, irregardless if my program is 32 or 64 bits? or should i do it this way: charptr =... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Leion
1 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Strings to integers in an arithmetic loop

Hi all, Could someone please advise what is the correct syntax for my little script to process a table of values? The table is as follows: 0.002432 20.827656 0.006432 23.120364 0.010432 25.914184 0.014432 20.442655 0.018432 20.015243 0.022432 21.579517 0.026432 18.886874... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: euval
9 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Delete strings in file1 based on the list of strings in file2

Hello guys, should be a very easy questn for you: I need to delete strings in file1 based on the list of strings in file2. like file2: word1_word2_ word3_word5_ word3_word4_ word6_word7_ file1: word1_word2_otherwords..,word3_word5_others... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: roussine
7 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Take a list if strings from a file and search them in a list of files and report them

I have a file 1.txt with the below contents. -----cat 1.txt----- 1234 5678 1256 1234 1247 ------------------- I have 3 more files in a folder -----ls -lrt------- A1.txt A2.txt A3.txt ------------------- The contents of those three files are similar format with different data values... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: realspirituals
8 Replies

9. Programming

unidirectional linked list pointer problem

I am trying to test some operations on a directed list. However, the declaration of a pointer is giving me trouble. I seem to have done something incorrectly because I get an error: "listtest.c:29: warning: 'p' may be used uninitialized in this function" Can anyone help? This is my code... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: bluetxxth
6 Replies

10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

How to pass strings from a list of strings from another file and create multiple files?

Hello Everyone , Iam a newbie to shell programming and iam reaching out if anyone can help in this :- I have two files 1) Insert.txt 2) partition_list.txt insert.txt looks like this :- insert into emp1 partition (partition_name) (a1, b2, c4, s6, d8) select a1, b2, c4, (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: nubie2linux
2 Replies
PARSE_TIME(3)						   BSD Library Functions Manual 					     PARSE_TIME(3)

NAME
parse_time, print_time_table, unparse_time, unparse_time_approx, -- parse and unparse time intervals LIBRARY
The roken library (libroken, -lroken) SYNOPSIS
#include <parse_time.h> int parse_time(const char *timespec, const char *def_unit); void print_time_table(FILE *f); size_t unparse_time(int seconds, char *buf, size_t len); size_t unparse_time_approx(int seconds, char *buf, size_t len); DESCRIPTION
The parse_time() function converts a the period of time specified in into a number of seconds. The timespec can be any number of <number unit> pairs separated by comma and whitespace. The number can be negative. Number without explicit units are taken as being def_unit. The unparse_time() and unparse_time_approx() does the opposite of parse_time(), that is they take a number of seconds and express that as human readable string. unparse_time produces an exact time, while unparse_time_approx restricts the result to only include one units. print_time_table() prints a descriptive list of available units on the passed file descriptor. The possible units include: second, s minute, m hour, h day week seven days month 30 days year 365 days Units names can be arbitrarily abbreviated (as long as they are unique). RETURN VALUES
parse_time() returns the number of seconds that represents the expression in timespec or -1 on error. unparse_time() and unparse_time_approx() return the number of characters written to buf. if the return value is greater than or equal to the len argument, the string was too short and some of the printed characters were discarded. EXAMPLES
#include <stdio.h> #include <parse_time.h> int main(int argc, char **argv) { int i; int result; char buf[128]; print_time_table(stdout); for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) { result = parse_time(argv[i], "second"); if(result == -1) { fprintf(stderr, "%s: parse error ", argv[i]); continue; } printf("-- "); printf("parse_time = %d ", result); unparse_time(result, buf, sizeof(buf)); printf("unparse_time = %s ", buf); unparse_time_approx(result, buf, sizeof(buf)); printf("unparse_time_approx = %s ", buf); } return 0; } $ ./a.out "1 minute 30 seconds" "90 s" "1 y -1 s" 1 year = 365 days 1 month = 30 days 1 week = 7 days 1 day = 24 hours 1 hour = 60 minutes 1 minute = 60 seconds 1 second -- parse_time = 90 unparse_time = 1 minute 30 seconds unparse_time_approx = 1 minute -- parse_time = 90 unparse_time = 1 minute 30 seconds unparse_time_approx = 1 minute -- parse_time = 31535999 unparse_time = 12 months 4 days 23 hours 59 minutes 59 seconds unparse_time_approx = 12 months BUGS
Since parse_time() returns -1 on error there is no way to parse "minus one second". Currently "s" at the end of units is ignored. This is a hack for English plural forms. If these functions are ever localised, this scheme will have to change. HEIMDAL
October 31, 2004 HEIMDAL
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy