Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: C++/ROOT Memory Allocation?
Top Forums Programming C++/ROOT Memory Allocation? Post 302802799 by Tyler_92 on Saturday 4th of May 2013 11:59:10 PM
Old 05-05-2013
I should have clarified, this program was written for ROOT, which uses CINT ( a c++ interpreter). In this case, "MontyHall2(parameters)" acts as the traditional c++ main function.
I googled "malloc" "calloc" and "free" statements. Should I be manually allocating and freeing memory? I'm wondering if the program is using free memory to store the array for each iteration rather than dumping the old array and using that memory space. Or something of that nature.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

memory allocation

I would like to know how I could allocate some more memory to a process. Please note that I am not the root user. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sagar
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

threads and memory allocation

Hello! First of all, forgive me for bad English. When I starts new thread (pthread_create), system allocates some memory for it (for example, for thread's stack). I wonder when does it deallocate this memory? The problem is that I have a program which sometimes creates new threads and sometimes... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: prankster
3 Replies

3. HP-UX

HP-UX memory usage allocation

Hi all, I have a HP-UX Server with 4 gigabytes of physical RAM. When I use the 'Glance' utility to see what my memory utilization is, my memory usage shows up maxed out at 99%. I shut off all the known processes that I'm running on that box and the memory utilization is still at 78% (with Swap... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: dehuang83
3 Replies

4. Programming

Is there a problem with the memory allocation???

I have a scenario like the client has to search for the active server.There will be many servers.But not all server are active.And at a time not more than one server will be active. The client will be in active state always i.e, it should always search for an active server until it gets one.I... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vigneshinbox
1 Replies

5. Programming

Memory allocation in C

Hi Experts I need some help in static memory allocation in C. I have a program in which I declared 2 variables, one char array and one integer. I was little surprised to see the addresses of the variables. First: int x; char a; printf("%u %u\n', &x, a); I got the addresses displayed... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: unx_freak
2 Replies

6. Programming

Dynamic Memory Allocation

Hello Guys I have a small confusion in the dynamic memory allocation concept. If we declare a pointer say a char pointer, we need to allocate adequate memory space. char* str = (char*)malloc(20*sizeof(char)); str = "This is a string"; But this will also work. char* str = "This... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: tene
2 Replies

7. Programming

Memory Allocation Query

When we dynamically allocate the memory say 100 integers say int *x = new int(1000); then does entire chunk of memory gets allocated at once after the completion of the statement? I mean will the the concept of page fault come into picture over here? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: rupeshkp728
3 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

memory allocation to a variable

hello all.. i'm a beginner in shell scripting. I need to know what is really happening when we are creating a variable in shell scripting? how memory is allocated for that variable? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: aarathy
3 Replies

9. Programming

memory allocation for string in C

hi in the following code, how the memory is allocated for a1 which holds the values of a2 after cpy function call. #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> void cpy(char* d, const char* s){ while(*d++=*s++); } main(){ char* a1; char* a2="done"; cpy(a1,a2); ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mprakasheee
3 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Memory allocation problem

I am using ubuntu. I have written a program to calculate prime factors. it works perfectly fine till entered number is less than 9989 (or so ) but when one enters a number higher than that, for example 15000, it does not work. Can anyone guide me whats the problem ? although new codes are welcome,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Abhishek_kumar
2 Replies
MALLOC(3)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 MALLOC(3)

NAME
calloc, malloc, free, realloc - Allocate and free dynamic memory SYNOPSIS
#include <stdlib.h> void *calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size); void *malloc(size_t size); void free(void *ptr); void *realloc(void *ptr, size_t size); DESCRIPTION
calloc() allocates memory for an array of nmemb elements of size bytes each and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The memory is set to zero. malloc() allocates size bytes and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The memory is not cleared. free() frees the memory space pointed to by ptr, which must have been returned by a previous call to malloc(), calloc() or realloc(). Oth- erwise, or if free(ptr) has already been called before, undefined behaviour occurs. If ptr is NULL, no operation is performed. realloc() changes the size of the memory block pointed to by ptr to size bytes. The contents will be unchanged to the minimum of the old and new sizes; newly allocated memory will be uninitialized. If ptr is NULL, the call is equivalent to malloc(size); if size is equal to zero, the call is equivalent to free(ptr). Unless ptr is NULL, it must have been returned by an earlier call to malloc(), calloc() or realloc(). RETURN VALUE
For calloc() and malloc(), the value returned is a pointer to the allocated memory, which is suitably aligned for any kind of variable, or NULL if the request fails. free() returns no value. realloc() returns a pointer to the newly allocated memory, which is suitably aligned for any kind of variable and may be different from ptr, or NULL if the request fails. If size was equal to 0, either NULL or a pointer suitable to be passed to free() is returned. If real- loc() fails the original block is left untouched - it is not freed or moved. CONFORMING TO
ANSI-C SEE ALSO
brk(2), posix_memalign(3) NOTES
The Unix98 standard requires malloc(), calloc(), and realloc() to set errno to ENOMEM upon failure. Glibc assumes that this is done (and the glibc versions of these routines do this); if you use a private malloc implementation that does not set errno, then certain library routines may fail without having a reason in errno. Crashes in malloc(), free() or realloc() are almost always related to heap corruption, such as overflowing an allocated chunk or freeing the same pointer twice. Recent versions of Linux libc (later than 5.4.23) and GNU libc (2.x) include a malloc implementation which is tunable via environment vari- ables. When MALLOC_CHECK_ is set, a special (less efficient) implementation is used which is designed to be tolerant against simple errors, such as double calls of free() with the same argument, or overruns of a single byte (off-by-one bugs). Not all such errors can be protected against, however, and memory leaks can result. If MALLOC_CHECK_ is set to 0, any detected heap corruption is silently ignored; if set to 1, a diagnostic is printed on stderr; if set to 2, abort() is called immediately. This can be useful because otherwise a crash may happen much later, and the true cause for the problem is then very hard to track down. Linux follows an optimistic memory allocation strategy. This means that when malloc() returns non-NULL there is no guarantee that the mem- ory really is available. In case it turns out that the system is out of memory, one or more processes will be killed by the infamous OOM killer. GNU
1993-04-04 MALLOC(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy