Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Fighting useless use of cat
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? Fighting useless use of cat Post 302782163 by Corona688 on Monday 18th of March 2013 11:02:20 AM
Old 03-18-2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadeInGermany
Both should work!
while is not an external command, it's a shell builtin. The same rules don't always apply. That you can redirect into them at all is a huge blessing and feature rather unique to Bourne-based shells.
 

5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

useless command

Hi, I came across with this line "set -x" in the beginning of a script, but i can't find one logic reason for this... should be something else after, i think.... anyone can help? tanx (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: cabresto
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Difference between cat , cat > , cat >> and touch !!!

Hi Can anybody tell the difference between Difference between cat , cat > , cat >> and touch command in UNIX? Thanks (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: skyineyes
6 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

cat in the command line doesn't match cat in the script

Hello, So I sorted my file as I was supposed to: sort -n -r -k 2 -k 1 file1 | uniq > file2 and when I wrote > cat file2 in the command line, I got what I was expecting, but in the script itself ... sort -n -r -k 2 -k 1 averages | uniq > temp cat file2 It wrote a whole... (21 Replies)
Discussion started by: shira
21 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Useless Cat usage

cat ~/text.xt | while read line do echo ${line} | perl -pe 's/(\d+)/localtime($1)/e' done how can i efficiently re-code the above? also, no matter how i run this, i'm not getting the current/correct date. the contents of the "text.xt" looks like this: SERVICES... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: SkySmart
2 Replies

5. What is on Your Mind?

Quest for the most useless command

I wrote by accident: cd . and even hit ENTER. Then I realized this is probably the most useless command that you can imagine. Yes, perhaps it could assert that there is still a working filesystem, but I am not sure about it. What do you think? Can you think of any more useless commands? :) (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: colemar
6 Replies
PWD(1)							    BSD General Commands Manual 						    PWD(1)

NAME
pwd -- return working directory name SYNOPSIS
pwd [-L | -P] DESCRIPTION
The pwd utility writes the absolute pathname of the current working directory to the standard output. Some shells may provide a builtin pwd command which is similar or identical to this utility. Consult the builtin(1) manual page. The options are as follows: -L Display the logical current working directory. -P Display the physical current working directory (all symbolic links resolved). If no options are specified, the -L option is assumed. ENVIRONMENT
Environment variables used by pwd: PWD Logical current working directory. EXIT STATUS
The pwd utility exits 0 on success, and >0 if an error occurs. SEE ALSO
builtin(1), cd(1), csh(1), sh(1), getcwd(3) STANDARDS
The pwd utility conforms to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (``POSIX.1''). BUGS
In csh(1) the command dirs is always faster because it is built into that shell. However, it can give a different answer in the rare case that the current directory or a containing directory was moved after the shell descended into it. The -L option does not work unless the PWD environment variable is exported by the shell. BSD
April 12, 2003 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy