Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: RAID 0 for SSD
Special Forums Hardware Filesystems, Disks and Memory RAID 0 for SSD Post 302779837 by fpmurphy on Wednesday 13th of March 2013 11:54:13 AM
Old 03-13-2013
Hardware RAID0 is always faster than a single disk because you can step the reads and writes across the two disks simultaneously. However, I have never come across a case where throughput was doubled. Typically you will get something like a 50% increase in throughput.

Software RAID0 can provide throughput improvement but typically less than hardware RAID0.
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. BSD

Using SSD in FreeBSD

Now that SSD drives are becoming mainstream, I had a few questions on installing a SSD drive in a FreeBSD environment. Can FreeBSD be made SSD aware, that is, somehow let FreeBSD know that reads and writes should be limited or deferred to extend the disk's life? Is there a setting for wear... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: figaro
0 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

RAID software vs hardware RAID

Hi Can someone tell me what are the differences between software and hardware raid ? thx for help. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: presul
2 Replies

3. AIX

SSD with GPFS ?

Hi, does anyone here happen to know if I could run GLVM or GPFS on Solid State Disks? I have a high volume / high transaction Sybase HACMP cluster currently setup with SRDF to the DR datacentre. My business now considers to move everything to SSD storage but we still need to get the data to... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: zxmaus
0 Replies

4. AIX

SCSI PCI - X RAID Controller card RAID 5 AIX Disks disappeared

Hello, I have a scsi pci x raid controller card on which I had created a disk array of 3 disks when I type lspv ; I used to see 3 physical disks ( two local disks and one raid 5 disk ) suddenly the raid 5 disk array disappeared ; so the hardware engineer thought the problem was with SCSI... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: filosophizer
0 Replies

5. Solaris

Software RAID on top of Hardware RAID

Server Model: T5120 with 146G x4 disks. OS: Solaris 10 - installed on c1t0d0. Plan to use software raid (veritas volume mgr) on c1t2d0 disk. After format and label the disk, still not able to detect using vxdiskadm. Question: Should I remove the hardware raid on c1t2d0 first? My... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: KhawHL
4 Replies

6. Red Hat

RAID Configuration for IBM Serveraid-7k SCSI RAID Controller

Hello, I want to delete a RAID configuration an old server has. Since i haven't the chance to work with the specific raid controller in the past can you please help me how to perform the configuraiton? I downloaded IBM ServeRAID Support CD but i wasn't able to configure the video card so i... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: @dagio
0 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

What should I format my SSD with?

Hello All, I recently received a new SSD that I am going to use for the purpose of Booting Virtual Machines. I use VMWare Player to boot Windows Guest Operating Systems onto my Linux Laptop. I currently have a SSD drive that I use for this exact same purpose that is formatted as ext3 and I'm... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mrm5102
3 Replies

8. Linux

CentOS 6.6 SSD trim on HP DL380 G2 RAID 0

I'm running glusterfs on CentOS 6.6 two nodes, (the SSD (samsung 840 1TB x2) is RAID 0 on the HP DL380 G6) x2, and trimming is not enable on it by checking /dev/sdb1/xxxxx/discard_max_bytes=0. Do I still need trimming? Somehow my filesystem is fine with 35-30% free space and running very fast. ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: itik
1 Replies
DDD(1L) 																   DDD(1L)

NAME
ddd - double-speed data dumper SYNOPSIS
ddd [option=value] ... DESCRIPTION
Ddd works almost the same way as dd(1), but it has a much better throughput, especially when used with slow i/o-devices, such as tape drives. The improvement is achieved mainly by dividing the copying process into two processes, one of which reads while the other one writes and vice versa. Also all code conversion capabilities are omitted. There is no additional overhead copying data between various conversion buffers. Ddd was inspired by the vast difference in speed between BSD4.2 and BSD4.3 dumps - in BSD4.3 dump(8) uses alternating processes to write to raw magnetic tape, thus keeping the tape continuously in motion. I wanted to get the same improvement to remote dumps, so this filter was needed. Directing all physical I/O through ddd usually increases the throughput of any pipeline of unix commands (if you have enough MIPS and RAM to handle two extra processes). OPTIONS
Ddd uses options if, of, ibs and obs exactly as dd(1). Option bs can also be used to specify ibs and obs at once. One option differs slightly in meaning: cbs can be used to specify the size of the internal buffer. Input and output processes will swap duties when cbs bytes have been transferred. Default values for all sizes are 512 bytes. As with dd(1), letters k (kilobyte), b (block) or w (word) can be appended to size values. Other options are not provided. HINTS
For best performance, block sizes should be rather large. For magnetic tape, I use obs=100b and cbs=500b or so. Large block sizes (~100b) are also effective for network connections. However, cbs should be small enough for all the data to fit in core, since page faults add overhead. AUTHOR
Tapani Lindgren <nispa@cs.hut.fi> Laboratory of Information Processing Science Helsinki University of Technology Finland SEE ALSO
dd(1), tar(1), dump(8) BUGS
Should you find one, let me know! WARNING
(Applies to U.S. residents & citizens only) Do not use this program! Get rid of it as soon as you can! It will probably corrupt all your data, break down your computer and cause severe injury to the operators. Even reading the source code may give you a headache. I warned you! I will take no responsibility what- soever! DDD(1L)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy