Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris How to install PGX32 on Sparc 10 Ultra? Post 302773999 by hicksd8 on Friday 1st of March 2013 03:53:14 AM
Old 03-01-2013
Brilliant! What a result. Well done!

You're obviously an IT professional, and ten out of ten for tenacity, but you may be distracted right now with all the effort so I'll say it anyway (not wishing to upset you), backup the whole thing asap.

You don't want to go through that again!!!

All the best.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Sun Ultra sparc 60

Hello everybody!! I need your help again. I am using Sun Ultra sparc 60 machine.Follwing are the types of files getting generated in /var/tmp. "windu_sm_o aaaa,baaa,caaa,daaa" etc. I am not able to locate which application is generating these files. Can I straightway delete these files ? or... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vikasdeshmukh
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Need Help , Ultra SPARC can not loading

Dear All, I have trouble, I have SPARC Machine and when start for loading, can not finish ! this is copy off message from my system Netra t 1120/1125 (UltraSPARC-II 440MHz), No Keyboard OpenBoot 3.31, 512 MB memory installed, Serial #12116535. Ethernet address 8:0:20:b8:e2:37, Host ID:... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: heru_90
4 Replies

3. Solaris

ultra sparc 2 no video - ok prompt access

I have an ultra sparc 2 with no video - I connect to it with hyperterm. Is there a way to get to the OK prompt? I have tried control/break and that does not work. If not is there a video card I can get to put in this box? I have Solaris 10 installed on this machine. Thanks (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: tribbles
7 Replies

4. Solaris

In Sparc Ultra 45 machine, how to enable bge1

In Sparc Ultra 45 machine, how to enable bge1 port, how to do if bge0 is down then bge1 should automatically up. Thanks & Regards (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: durgaprasadr13
2 Replies

5. Solaris

Null modem cable in Ultra sparc 10

Hi Gurus, Can I use null modem cable in Ultra sparc 10 workstation Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: kumarmani
3 Replies

6. Debian

Problem installing Debian5 on an ultra sparc machine

Comments/Problems: Machine boots from CDROM, starts SILO Version 1.4.13, display welcome message (welcome to Debian GNU/Linux lenny! built on 20081218-10:06 ). boot: Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x40000000 for kernel Loaded kernel version 2.6.26 Loading initial ramdisk... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mtk
3 Replies

7. Solaris

How much better performance is ultra SPARC IV+ 1.95GHz than 1.35GHz?

Dear Guru, My boss has a plan to upgrade cpu of server so he needs to know how much better performance(percentage) is Ultra SPARC IV+ 1.95 GHz than Ultra SPARC IV 1.35 GHz?. I am looking for documentation to reference but I didn't see anything close to my point. If who know,... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: unitipon
3 Replies

8. Solaris

Sun Sparc Ultra 4 won't boot - disk errors

Hi all. I am seeing in one of our less-used servers that it crashed and now won't restart. I get the message 'continue with normal startup or boot into maintenance mode'. I go into maintenance and run fsck on /usr0 (mentioned in error at restart) it then reboots but goes right back to... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jamie_collins
3 Replies

9. Ubuntu

Sudo issues with Ubuntu 7.10 Running on a Ultra SPARC Machine

I have a Sun Blade 1000 machine that I installed Ubuntu 7.10 SPARC onto. The only user configured (configure during install) cannot use sudo. When I try to issue a command using sudo (ex. sudo apt-get install) it asks me for my password and returns the error "user not found in sudoers file". I need... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: swilso
4 Replies

10. Hardware

Sun Sparc Ultra 30 help

Hi all, I managed to salvage form work an old Sun Sparc Ultra 30. I have had it stored (controlled storage) for a few years and decided to get it home and boot it up. It starts up with a beep then I can hear disks spinning up, CDROM moving but nothing is displayed on the monitor. Can... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: robbo007
2 Replies
BITMAP_ONTO(9)						  Basic Kernel Library Functions					    BITMAP_ONTO(9)

NAME
bitmap_onto - translate one bitmap relative to another SYNOPSIS
void bitmap_onto(unsigned long * dst, const unsigned long * orig, const unsigned long * relmap, int bits); ARGUMENTS
dst resulting translated bitmap orig original untranslated bitmap relmap bitmap relative to which translated bits number of bits in each of these bitmaps DESCRIPTION
Set the n-th bit of dst iff there exists some m such that the n-th bit of relmap is set, the m-th bit of orig is set, and the n-th bit of relmap is also the m-th _set_ bit of relmap. (If you understood the previous sentence the first time your read it, you're overqualified for your current job.) In other words, orig is mapped onto (surjectively) dst, using the the map { <n, m> | the n-th bit of relmap is the m-th set bit of relmap }. Any set bits in orig above bit number W, where W is the weight of (number of set bits in) relmap are mapped nowhere. In particular, if for all bits m set in orig, m >= W, then dst will end up empty. In situations where the possibility of such an empty result is not desired, one way to avoid it is to use the bitmap_fold operator, below, to first fold the orig bitmap over itself so that all its set bits x are in the range 0 <= x < W. The bitmap_fold operator does this by setting the bit (m % W) in dst, for each bit (m) set in orig. Example [1] for bitmap_onto: Let's say relmap has bits 30-39 set, and orig has bits 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 set. Then on return from this routine, dst will have bits 31, 33, 35, 37 and 39 set. When bit 0 is set in orig, it means turn on the bit in dst corresponding to whatever is the first bit (if any) that is turned on in relmap. Since bit 0 was off in the above example, we leave off that bit (bit 30) in dst. When bit 1 is set in orig (as in the above example), it means turn on the bit in dst corresponding to whatever is the second bit that is turned on in relmap. The second bit in relmap that was turned on in the above example was bit 31, so we turned on bit 31 in dst. Similarly, we turned on bits 33, 35, 37 and 39 in dst, because they were the 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th set bits set in relmap, and the 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th bits of orig (i.e. bits 3, 5, 7 and 9) were also set. When bit 11 is set in orig, it means turn on the bit in dst corresponding to whatever is the twelfth bit that is turned on in relmap. In the above example, there were only ten bits turned on in relmap (30..39), so that bit 11 was set in orig had no affect on dst. Example [2] for bitmap_fold + bitmap_onto: Let's say relmap has these ten bits set: 40 41 42 43 45 48 53 61 74 95 (for the curious, that's 40 plus the first ten terms of the Fibonacci sequence.) Further lets say we use the following code, invoking bitmap_fold then bitmap_onto, as suggested above to avoid the possitility of an empty dst result: unsigned long *tmp; // a temporary bitmap's bits bitmap_fold(tmp, orig, bitmap_weight(relmap, bits), bits); bitmap_onto(dst, tmp, relmap, bits); Then this table shows what various values of dst would be, for various orig's. I list the zero-based positions of each set bit. The tmp column shows the intermediate result, as computed by using bitmap_fold to fold the orig bitmap modulo ten (the weight of relmap). orig tmp dst 0 0 40 1 1 41 9 9 95 10 0 40 (*) 1 3 5 7 1 3 5 7 41 43 48 61 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 40 41 42 43 45 0 9 18 27 0 9 8 7 40 61 74 95 0 10 20 30 0 40 0 11 22 33 0 1 2 3 40 41 42 43 0 12 24 36 0 2 4 6 40 42 45 53 78 102 211 1 2 8 41 42 74 (*) (*) For these marked lines, if we hadn't first done bitmap_fold into tmp, then the dst result would have been empty. If either of orig or relmap is empty (no set bits), then dst will be returned empty. If (as explained above) the only set bits in orig are in positions m where m >= W, (where W is the weight of relmap) then dst will once again be returned empty. All bits in dst not set by the above rule are cleared. COPYRIGHT
Kernel Hackers Manual 3.10 June 2014 BITMAP_ONTO(9)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy