02-05-2013
Issue with rpm package
Hello
I have Storage foundation 6.0 version to install in redhat 6.0, so while trying to install one of the application it say to install some dependencies packages so when i try to install the dependencies again it ask for the dependencies so its a lengthy process i say. so now can i get the full package with dependencies ...
if YES please send me the link
BELOW THE ERRORS ARE
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -ivh /root/Downloads/glibc-2.12-1.25.el6.i686.rpm
warning: /root/Downloads/glibc-2.12-1.25.el6.i686.rpm: Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 192a7d7d: NOKEY
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.12-1.25.el6 is needed by glibc-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libfreebl3.so is needed by glibc-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libfreebl3.so(NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3) is needed by glibc-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -ivh /root/Downloads/glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686.rpm
warning: /root/Downloads/glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686.rpm: Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 192a7d7d: NOKEY
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.12-1.25.el6 is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libc.so.6 is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.1) is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.10) is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libdl.so.2 is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6.i686
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Linux
have following package installed
rpm -qa |grep ADMIN
It will give the following package installed:
ADMIN-4.0.0.1
Now I will upgrade the ADMIN package using the following command.
rpm --upgrade ADMIN-4.1.0.1
It will upgrade the ADMIN packagge to ADMIN-4.1.0.1
Now I want that... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: amitpansuria
0 Replies
2. Ubuntu
Hi All,
I just recently installed UBUNTU 2.6.24-16 and i installed my phone software which is a RPM package (it's a similiar package with MSN).
The software called MXIE.
I managed to install it successfully but i can't run the software.
When i try to run it, i received... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: c00kie88
8 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Is it possible to rollback a package in Redhat ?I don't want to delete any packages.
I have upgraded a package using rpm -Uvh & now i decided to use the old package, is it possible to revert it back to the original package ? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: sydney2008
3 Replies
4. Linux
Hi,
I have built one RPM last year. now we have another version of that RPM. in previous release we had few extra files then now. so when user upgrade it those files get deleted by RPM package. We want to retain those files.
now for workaround i thought of backing up those file during... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: ajayyadavmca
0 Replies
5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Friends,
Please let meknow, How we can find the dependancies of .dstream package & .rpm package before installation ?
For AIX, We can use the inutoc . command to create the .toc file for the bff package, What about Solaris & Linux ? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: yb4779
0 Replies
6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello,
i have downloaded an rpm package "hadoop-0.20.205.0-1.amd64.rpm"
in /usr/local/ directory.
I'm trying to install the rpm package in a new path/location (/usr/local/hadoop-0.20.205), but i can't.
I did:
1st try: Didn't work
sudo rpm -i --prefix=/usr/local/hadoop-0.20.205... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: g_p
1 Replies
7. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support
Hello,
i have installed a package by using the command
sudo rpm -i filepackage.rpm
package filepackage is already installed
when i try to remove it, i get an error saying "is not installed":
sudo rpm -e filepackage.rpm
error: package filepackage is not installed
How can... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: g_p
4 Replies
8. AIX
dears
i am trying to install the autoconf-2.63-1.aix6.1.noarch.rpm but its shows the below error message .
P700_dev/svn/dependencies>rpm -i autoconf-2.63-1.aix6.1.noarch.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
m4 is needed by autoconf-2.63-1
P700_dev/svn/dependencies> (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: thecobra151
6 Replies
9. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Is there a way to create a protected RPM package without giving up your source code? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: cokedude
2 Replies
10. AIX
Hi Guys
I got this error when I try to install perl-5.24.0-1.aix6.1.ppc.rpm package
rpm -ivh perl-5.24.0-1.aix6.1.ppc.rpm
error: perl-5.24.0-1.aix6.1.ppc.rpm does not appear to be a RPM package (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: khaled_ly84
4 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
pmdirs
PMDIRS(1p) User Contributed Perl Documentation PMDIRS(1p)
NAME
pmdirs - print out module directories
DESCRIPTION
This just prints out the current @INC path, one directory per line. This is for people who don't want to parse through "perl -V" output or
hack up their own calls to "perl -e".
EXAMPLES
$ pmdirs
/home/tchrist/perllib/i686-linux
/home/tchrist/perllib
/usr/local/devperl/lib/5.00554/i686-linux
/usr/local/devperl/lib/5.00554
/usr/local/devperl/lib/site_perl/5.00554/i686-linux
/usr/local/devperl/lib/site_perl/5.00554
.
This also works for alternate version of Perl:
$ filsperl -S pmdirs
/home/tchrist/perllib
/usr/local/filsperl/lib/5.00554/i686-linux-thread
/usr/local/filsperl/lib/5.00554
/usr/local/filsperl/lib/site_perl/5.00554/i686-linux-thread
/usr/local/filsperl/lib/site_perl/5.00554
.
SEE ALSO
perlrun(1), perlvar(1), lib(3)
AUTHORS and COPYRIGHTS
Copyright (C) 1999 Tom Christiansen.
Copyright (C) 2006-2008 Mark Leighton Fisher.
This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of either: (a) the GNU General Public License as published
by the Free Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) any later version, or (b) the Perl "Artistic License". (This is the
Perl 5 licensing scheme.)
Please note this is a change from the original pmtools-1.00 (still available on CPAN), as pmtools-1.00 were licensed only under the Perl
"Artistic License".
perl v5.10.1 2010-02-22 PMDIRS(1p)