02-04-2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by
s_linux
Thanks for your response Don, As I'm not sure if I could change the application, is there any other way that I can setup so that files can be created with 644. Thanks.
If you know the name of the file that the application will create, you could move the application to an alternative location and replace it by a script that will call the moved application and then change the mode of the file it creates. (This probably only works if the name of the file to be created is passed to the application as one of its operands.)
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi, I'm new to unix -solaris.
I've just upgraded a third party software product and am testing
it to see if new files created in a test database directory were being created properly and they aren't. They're owned by the user that created the file, instead of poppa and the group of their files... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: avisb
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Whenever I create a new file the group name is "dnn" and the file permissions are "-rw-r--r--".
How do I get it so when I create files (with vi or other programs) that the default group is "sss" and the permissions are 770?
(I am running HP-UNIX)
Thanks,
GoldFish (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: goldfish
2 Replies
3. Shell Programming and Scripting
I want to do just what the title says. Here's why:
I am adapting a script that backups to a mount. In the script it has a catch where if the drive isn't RW then it unmounts and attempts to remount RW.
# attempt to remount the RW mount point as RW; else abort
$MOUNT -o remount,rw... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Movomito
3 Replies
4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi,
Within a SQL file i am calling 5 shell scripts in back ground and redirecting their outputs to different log files in a specific directory.
Now when I observed is, the log files are created with different permissions even though i did not do any thing specific.
For example in... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: steria_learner
2 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello All,
I am application admin. I need to clear all the temporary files cleared by the applications. I need help/suggestion that is there any way to create a file system such that every Dir created in by any user will have 775 permissions. So, that i can simply clear the temporary file which... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: firestar
6 Replies
6. Ubuntu
Ubuntu 10.04, Drupal 7.0
:wall:
I created a Linux instance on Amazon AWS using a bitnami Linux image, and had a website up and running using Drupal. Coming from a Windows background I wanted to use a GUI to manage files because it is much faster for me, I got Gnome running on TightVNC by... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: alterego55
4 Replies
7. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi All,
I am completely stuck here.
I have a set of files (with names A.txt, B.txt until L.txt) which contain words like these:
computer
random access memory
computer networking
mouse
terminal
windows
All the files from A.txt to L.txt have the same format i.e. complete words in... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: shoaibjameel123
2 Replies
8. SuSE
Hi,
One application that I have generates log files into a specific folder in SUSE. When the size of the log file reaches 50 MB, it gets rolled over and it is stored as testlog_1.log and the new events are logged in testlog.log
When I set a chmod -R 744 on the directory of these logs, it... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: graosn
4 Replies
9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi,
If User1, User2 and User3 are in the same group. User1 should not be able to view the files of User2 and User3. But User2 and User3 should be able to view all files.
How to set permission for this.
Please help.
Thanks,
Priya. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: banupriyat
1 Replies
10. Solaris
I want to set ACL permissions using this command in solaris 10 , but I get an error message.
server# mkdir dir1
server# setfacl -m user:allan:rwx dir1
setacl error: Operation not applicable
Any one can help in this matter.
Please use CODE tags as required by forum rules! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: AbuAliiiiiiiiii
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
stat::lsmode
lsMode(3pm) User Contributed Perl Documentation lsMode(3pm)
NAME
Stat::lsMode - format file modes like the "ls -l" command does
SYNOPSIS
use Stat::lsMode;
$mode = (stat $file)[2];
$permissions = format_mode($mode);
# $permissions is now something like `drwxr-xr-x'
$permissions = file_mode($file); # Same as above
$permissions = format_perms(0644); # Produces just 'rw-r--r--'
$permissions = format_perms(644); # This generates a warning message:
# mode 644 is very surprising. Perhaps you meant 0644...
Stat::lsMode->novice(0); # Disable warning messages
DESCRIPTION
"Stat::lsMode" generates mode and permission strings that look like the ones generated by the Unix "ls -l" command. For example, a regular
file that is readable by everyone and writable only by its owner has the mode string "-rw-r--r--". "Stat::lsMode" will either examine the
file and produce the right mode string for you, or you can pass it the mode that you get back from Perl's "stat" call.
"format_mode"
Given a mode number (such as the third element of the list returned by "stat"), return the appopriate ten-character mode string as it would
have been generated by "ls -l". For example, consider a directory that is readable and searchable by everyone, and also writable by its
owner. Such a directory will have mode 040755. When passed this value, "format_mode" will return the string "drwxr-xr-x".
If "format_mode" is passed a permission number like 0755, it will return a nine-character string insted, with no leading character to say
what the file type is. For example, "format_mode(0755)" will return just "rwxr-xr-x", without the leading "d".
"file_mode"
Given a filename, do "lstat" on the file to determine the mode, and return the mode, formatted as above.
Novice Operation Mode
A common mistake when dealing with permission modes is to use 644 where you meant to use 0644. Every permission has a numeric
representation, but the representation only makes sense when you write the number in octal. The decimal number 644 corresponds to a
permission setting, but not the one you think. If you write it in octal you get 01204, which corresponds to the unlikely permissions
"-w----r-T", not to "rw-r--r--".
The appearance of the bizarre permission "-w----r-T" in a program is almost a sure sign that someone used 644 when they meant to use 0644.
By default, this module will detect the use of such unlikely permissions and issue a warning if you try to format them. To disable these
warnings, use
Stat::lsMode->novice(0); # disable novice mode
Stat::lsMode->novice(1); # enable novice mode again
The surprising permissions that are diagnosed by this mode are:
111 => --xr-xrwx
400 => rw--w----
440 => rw-rwx---
444 => rw-rwxr--
551 => ---r--rwt
600 => --x-wx--T
640 => -w------T
644 => -w----r-T
660 => -w--w-r-T
664 => -w--wx--T
666 => -w--wx-wT
700 => -w-rwxr-T
711 => -wx---rwt
750 => -wxr-xrwT
751 => -wxr-xrwt
751 => -wxr-xrwt
755 => -wxrw--wt
770 => r------wT
771 => r------wt
775 => r-----rwt
777 => r----x--t
Of these, only 400 is remotely plausible.
BUGS
As far as I know, the precise definition of the mode bits is portable between varieties of Unix. The module should, however, examine
"stat.h" or use some other method to find out if there are any local variations, because Unix being Unix, someone somewhere probably does
it differently.
Maybe it "file_mode" should have an option that says that if the file is a symlink, to format the mode of the pointed to file instead of
the mode of the link itself, the way "ls -Ll" does.
SEE ALSO
o "http://www.plover.com/~mjd/perl/lsMode/".
o ls
o chmod
o stat
AUTHOR
Mark-Jason Dominus ("mjd-perl-lsmode@plover.com").
perl v5.10.1 1998-04-20 lsMode(3pm)