RENAME(2)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 RENAME(2)

NAME

       rename - change the name or location of a file

SYNOPSIS

       #include <stdio.h>

       int rename(const char *oldpath, const char *newpath);

DESCRIPTION

       rename()  renames a file, moving it between directories if required.  Any other hard links to the file (as created using link(2)) are unaf-
       fected.	Open file descriptors for oldpath are also unaffected.

       If newpath already exists it will be atomically replaced (subject to a few conditions; see ERRORS below), so that  there  is  no  point	at
       which another process attempting to access newpath will find it missing.

       If oldpath and newpath are existing hard links referring to the same file, then rename() does nothing, and returns a success status.

       If newpath exists but the operation fails for some reason rename() guarantees to leave an instance of newpath in place.

       oldpath can specify a directory.  In this case, newpath must either not exist, or it must specify an empty directory.

       However, when overwriting there will probably be a window in which both oldpath and newpath refer to the file being renamed.

       If oldpath refers to a symbolic link the link is renamed; if newpath refers to a symbolic link the link will be overwritten.

RETURN VALUE

       On success, zero is returned.  On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.

ERRORS

       EACCES Write  permission is denied for the directory containing oldpath or newpath, or, search permission is denied for one of the directo-
	      ries in the path prefix of oldpath or newpath, or oldpath is a directory and does not allow write permission (needed to  update  the
	      ..  entry).  (See also path_resolution(7).)

       EBUSY  The  rename fails because oldpath or newpath is a directory that is in use by some process (perhaps as current working directory, or
	      as root directory, or because it was open for reading) or is in use by the system (for example as mount  point),	while  the  system
	      considers  this  an  error.  (Note that there is no requirement to return EBUSY in such cases--there is nothing wrong with doing the
	      rename anyway--but it is allowed to return EBUSY if the system cannot otherwise handle such situations.)

       EDQUOT The user's quota of disk blocks on the file system has been exhausted.

       EFAULT oldpath or newpath points outside your accessible address space.

       EINVAL The new pathname contained a path prefix of the old, or, more generally, an attempt was made to make a directory a  subdirectory	of
	      itself.

       EISDIR newpath is an existing directory, but oldpath is not a directory.

       ELOOP  Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving oldpath or newpath.

       EMLINK oldpath  already	has  the maximum number of links to it, or it was a directory and the directory containing newpath has the maximum
	      number of links.

       ENAMETOOLONG
	      oldpath or newpath was too long.

       ENOENT The link named by oldpath does not exist; or, a directory component in newpath does not exist; or, oldpath or newpath  is  an  empty
	      string.

       ENOMEM Insufficient kernel memory was available.

       ENOSPC The device containing the file has no room for the new directory entry.

       ENOTDIR
	      A  component used as a directory in oldpath or newpath is not, in fact, a directory.  Or, oldpath is a directory, and newpath exists
	      but is not a directory.

       ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST
	      newpath is a nonempty directory, that is, contains entries other than "." and "..".

       EPERM or EACCES
	      The directory containing oldpath has the sticky bit (S_ISVTX) set and the process's effective user ID is neither the user ID of  the
	      file  to	be deleted nor that of the directory containing it, and the process is not privileged (Linux: does not have the CAP_FOWNER
	      capability); or newpath is an existing file and the directory containing it has the sticky bit set and the process's effective  user
	      ID  is  neither  the  user  ID of the file to be replaced nor that of the directory containing it, and the process is not privileged
	      (Linux: does not have the CAP_FOWNER capability); or the file system containing pathname does  not  support  renaming  of  the  type
	      requested.

       EROFS  The file is on a read-only file system.

       EXDEV  oldpath  and  newpath  are  not on the same mounted file system.	(Linux permits a file system to be mounted at multiple points, but
	      rename() does not work across different mount points, even if the same file system is mounted on both.)

CONFORMING TO

       4.3BSD, C89, C99, POSIX.1-2001.

BUGS

       On NFS file systems, you can not assume that if the operation failed the file was not renamed.  If the server does the rename operation and
       then  crashes,  the retransmitted RPC which will be processed when the server is up again causes a failure.  The application is expected to
       deal with this.	See link(2) for a similar problem.

SEE ALSO

       mv(1), chmod(2), link(2), renameat(2), symlink(2), unlink(2), path_resolution(7), symlink(7)

COLOPHON

       This page is part of release 3.53 of the Linux man-pages project.  A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs,  can
       be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.

Linux								    2013-01-27								 RENAME(2)