Sponsored Content
Operating Systems AIX AIX 7.1 TL update -> only latest or one by one? Post 302757561 by bakunin on Thursday 17th of January 2013 04:47:36 PM
Old 01-17-2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelFelt
Personally, I go for all in one go - smitty update_all and run with preview activated to check for errors or other warnings.
Same here. In the overwhelming majority of cases this is safe, historically there were only a few TL/MLs that had problems.

I remember 5.3 ML8 (or ML9? not sure) having a problem if updating from ML3 - one had to update to ML7 first and then to do a second update to ML8. Similar from 4.1.1 to 4.1.4 IIRC. All other combinations i had to work with were without problems.

I hope this helps.

bakunin
These 2 Users Gave Thanks to bakunin For This Post:
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. AIX

Update AIX 5.3 to TL07 SP5

Hi, We need to update our AIX to TL07 SP5, and it's an HACMP architecture with node1 and node2 and is active/active. I need help because I never patched an AIX in HACMP, and I don't know the sequence that I have to proceed, I have Oracle databases running on both (node1, node2). I receive a... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: azzed27
0 Replies

2. AIX

Latest AIX Service Pack

Hello, I am trying to install Oracle 11g on my AIX server and it requires at a minimum OS level 5300-05-06. I am currently at 5300-05-01. What do I need to upgrade this? Where can I get this sp? What are the step to install this? I am a DBA not sysadmin. We no longer have a sysadmin. Lucky... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: dkranes
4 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

how can i know the latest update packages i have installed on solaris 9 ???

i want to know the update packages that i have installed on my solaris 9 (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: MONMON
2 Replies

4. AIX

Failed update AIX 6.1

Hi, I have problem with update AIX in ML 01 to ML 04. I am new in AIX system, please help me how resolve this problem. Thanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bieszczaders
2 Replies

5. AIX

AIX Fix Pack update

Hi All, i'm try to update my aix 6100.06.05 to 6100.07.00. i download the 4,5 GB of FixPack buy i don't have a required package (devices.chrp.pci.rte 6.1.7.0) This package does not exist on the fix pack (i've check in the .toc file and in the .bff files) On ibm website i see that this... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Zio Bill
0 Replies

6. Red Hat

Get latest update for RHEL systems

Hi all, I want to get latest package updates for my RHEL systems. I don't any account with RHN so that I can get updates from there. All I'm interested in knowing is that is it possible to get package updates without registering with RHN. And If yes then how. I have read about RHN satellite and... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Darshan Parab
3 Replies

7. AIX

AIX SP update and Oracle interaction

Situation: AIX 7.1 various SP levels Update to SP9 on DB systems with Oracle 10 or 11G Steps: Apply SP9 update Bring down databases shutdown -Fr Check system health - AIX Bring up databases Confirm functionality Would applying the update while the databases are up cause problems... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: allenhibbert
7 Replies

8. AIX

OpenSSH update in AIX

Hi, We have 4 vulnerabilities in our AIX servers and the files to be installed are as follows: File to be installed OpenSSH_6.0.0.6102 OpenSSH_6.0.0.6107 OpenSSH_6.0.0.6110 Openssh_fix8 My question is, can we install the Openss_fix8 directly to resolve all the issues or should we... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: gshari.89
2 Replies

9. AIX

How to update NTP on AIX?

Hi, I would like to update NTP version on AIX LPARs. lslpp -L bos.net.tcp.client Fileset Level State Type Description (Uninstaller) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- bos.net.tcp.client 7.1.3.1 C F ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: dio34
3 Replies
Apache::TestSmoke(3pm)					User Contributed Perl Documentation				    Apache::TestSmoke(3pm)

NAME
Apache::TestSmoke - Special Tests Sequence Failure Finder SYNOPSIS
# get the usage and the default values % t/SMOKE -help # repeat all tests 5 times and save the report into # the file 'myreport' % t/SMOKE -times=5 -report=myreport # run all tests default number of iterations, and repeat tests # default number of times % t/SMOKE # same as above but work only the specified tests % t/SMOKE foo/bar foo/tar # run once a sequence of tests in a non-random mode # e.g. when trying to reduce a known long sequence that fails % t/SMOKE -order=rotate -times=1 foo/bar foo/tar # show me each currently running test # it's not the same as running the tests in the verbose mode % t/SMOKE -verbose # run t/TEST, but show any problems after *each* tests is run # useful for bug reports (it actually runs t/TEST -start, then # t/TEST -run for each test separately and finally t/TEST -stop % t/SMOKE -bug_mode # now read the created report file DESCRIPTION
The Problem When we try to test a stateless machine (i.e. all tests are independent), running all tests once ensures that all tested things properly work. However when a state machine is tested (i.e. where a run of one test may influence another test) it's not enough to run all the tests once to know that the tested features actually work. It's quite possible that if the same tests are run in a different order and/or repeated a few times, some tests may fail. This usually happens when some tests don't restore the system under test to its pristine state at the end of the run, which may influence other tests which rely on the fact that they start on pristine state, when in fact it's not true anymore. In fact it's possible that a single test may fail when run twice or three times in a sequence. The Solution To reduce the possibility of such dependency errors, it's helpful to run random testing repeated many times with many different srand seeds. Of course if no failures get spotted that doesn't mean that there are no tests inter-dependencies, which may cause a failure in production. But random testing definitely helps to spot many problems and can give better test coverage. Resolving Sequence Problems When this kind of testing is used and a failure is detected there are two problems: 1. First is to be able to reproduce the problem so if we think we fixed it, we could verify the fix. This one is easy, just remember the sequence of tests run till the failed test and rerun the same sequence once again after the problem has been fixed. 2. Second is to be able to understand the cause of the problem. If during the random test the failure has happened after running 400 tests, how can we possibly know which previously running tests has caused to the failure of the test 401. Chances are that most of the tests were clean and don't have inter-dependency problem. Therefore it'd be very helpful if we could reduce the long sequence to a minimum. Preferably 1 or 2 tests. That's when we can try to understand the cause of the detected problem. This utility attempts to solve both problems, and at the end of each iteration print a minimal sequence of tests causing to a failure. This doesn't always succeed, but works in many cases. This utility: 1. Runs the tests randomly until the first failure is detected. Or non-randomly if the option -order is set to repeat or rotate. 2. Then it tries to reduce that sequence of tests to a minimum, and this sequence still causes to the same failure. 3. (XXX: todo): then it reruns the minimal sequence in the verbose mode and saves the output. 4. It reports all the successful reductions as it goes to STDOUT and report file of the format: smoke-report-<date>.txt. In addition the systems build parameters are logged into the report file, so the detected problems could be reproduced. 5. Goto 1 and run again using a new random seed, which potentially should detect different failures. Reduction Algorithm Currently for each reduction path, the following reduction algorithms get applied: 1. Binary search: first try the upper half then the lower. 2. Random window: randomize the left item, then the right item and return the items between these two points. t/SMOKE.PL t/SMOKE.PL is driving this module, if you don't have it, create it: #!perl use strict; use warnings FATAL => 'all'; use FindBin; use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../Apache-Test/lib"; use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../lib"; use Apache::TestSmoke (); Apache::TestSmoke->new(@ARGV)->run; usually Makefile.PL converts it into t/SMOKE while adjusting the perl path, but you create t/SMOKE in first place as well. AUTHOR
Stas Bekman perl v5.14.2 2011-02-08 Apache::TestSmoke(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy