01-04-2013
Snmp and NAT
Hello,
I am facing this scenario: three or more remote LAN (peripheral offices), with the same devices (printers, NAS) in each of them. Those LANs have the same network addresses, i.e.192.168.1.* (are connected to WAN via NAT).
I need to collect snmp traps from a central server (public IP).
Question: how can I distinguish traps sent from two devices in different remote locations? Suppose I receive a trap from printer HP2605 with IP 192.168.1.50: I have two or more printers HP2605, same IP, in different remote offices.
Which one has generated the trap?
If you think, even for a single LAN the proble arises: two or more identical laptops in DHCP, sending traps to a server: how recognize the device sending the trap, if IPs are dynamic?
Many thank for thinking with me.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. BSD
how do i configure proxy in freeBSD or NAT so that when i set it up as a server can connect other to my new gateway (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: AkinOkin
0 Replies
2. IP Networking
Hi All,
Is there any possibility to change the IP address of a package according to its MAC address. It would be a sort of L2 NAT. (i.e. If the MAC address is 00:1A:A0:1E:XX:XX so the dir IP will be 192.168.X.X)
Thanks!. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: lagigliaivan
4 Replies
3. Shell Programming and Scripting
hellou, can anybody help me with nat detection in real time ? i prefer some detection script because i try some nat detection program's for example p0f or i'm using tcpdump, but i would get contain of specific packet. Some ideas? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: TheTechnic
1 Replies
4. Solaris
Hi everybody,
I'm running on Solaris 10 X86 (update 1009).
I would like to make NAT's rule. I explain you.
On Solaris, I configure the principal interface e1000g0 with IP : 192.168.0.33
I created the first logical interface like that :
ifconfig e1000g0 addif 192.168.0.40 netmask... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: aureliensm
0 Replies
5. IP Networking
Hi ,
Currently DELL OMSA SNMP sends data through default udp port 161.I want my custom SNMP MIB also to send data in the same udp port 161.Whether its possible.If yes where to configure .I tried starting my custom MIB in udp port 161,but it throws port already in use.Kindly guide. (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: prabakar4all
0 Replies
6. Red Hat
Hi ,
Currently DELL OMSA SNMP sends data through default udp port 161.I want my custom SNMP MIB also to send data in the same udp port 161.Whether its possible.If yes where to configure .I tried starting my custom MIB in udp port 161,but it throws port already in use.Kindly guide. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: prabakar4all
1 Replies
7. IP Networking
I am having a problem with an SNMP event, and I am not sure where I should be looking to solve this problem.
Description:
There is an SNMP event in our system that for one reason or another is not getting sent out as an email because it is never getting to our SNMP agent.
I see where the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: broberts
0 Replies
8. Infrastructure Monitoring
Dear Champs,
I am new to unix, and need to configure linux server to send below traps to a SNMP server.
Monitoring TRAP Disk Space Low
Monitoring TRAP Memory Low
Monitoring TRAP CPU high
Monitoring TRAP Admin login/Logoff
Please help me how to send this information to my SNMP server... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: stavar
2 Replies
9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
i am working with embedded system -Dell DCS management sub system. my question is as below:
currently we are using linux kernel 2.6.30 build and we have a kernel logs stored to the /var/log/messages path. now we have to transfer all this logs to the specified SNMP target as a part of SNMP... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: vipul_prajapati
4 Replies
10. Solaris
Hi.
I am attempting to set up an OpenVPN server on my Solaris 11 box by following all the Linux guides. Thus far I have a working VPN that I can connect to and ssh onto my VPN server over which is great but not what I require long term.
I would like to route all VPN client requests for addresses... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: nickb1976
0 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
shorewall-exclusion
SHOREWALL-EXCLUSION(5) [FIXME: manual] SHOREWALL-EXCLUSION(5)
NAME
exclusion - Exclude a set of hosts from a definition in a shorewall configuration file.
SYNOPSIS
!address-or-range[,address-or-range]...
!zone-name[,zone-name]...
DESCRIPTION
The first form of exclusion is used when you wish to exclude one or more addresses from a definition. An exclaimation point is followed by
a comma-separated list of addresses. The addresses may be single host addresses (e.g., 192.168.1.4) or they may be network addresses in
CIDR format (e.g., 192.168.1.0/24). If your kernel and iptables include iprange support, you may also specify ranges of ip addresses of the
form lowaddress-highaddress
No embedded whitespace is allowed.
Exclusion can appear after a list of addresses and/or address ranges. In that case, the final list of address is formed by taking the first
list and then removing the addresses defined in the exclusion.
Beginning in Shorewall 4.4.13, the second form of exclusion is allowed after all and any in the SOURCE and DEST columns of
/etc/shorewall/rules. It allows you to omit arbitrary zones from the list generated by those key words.
Warning
If you omit a sub-zone and there is an explicit or explicit CONTINUE policy, a connection to/from that zone can still be matched by the
rule generated for a parent zone.
For example:
/etc/shorewall/zones:
#ZONE TYPE
z1 ip
z2:z1 ip
...
/etc/shorewall/policy:
#SOURCE DEST POLICY
z1 net CONTINUE
z2 net REJECT
/etc/shorewall/rules:
#ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST
# PORT(S)
ACCEPT all!z2 net tcp 22
In this case, SSH connections from z2 to net will be accepted by the generated z1 to net ACCEPT rule.
In most contexts, ipset names can be used as an address-or-range. Beginning with Shorewall 4.4.14, ipset lists enclosed in +[...] may also
be included (see shorewall-ipsets[1] (5)). The semantics of these lists when used in an exclusion are as follows:
o !+[set1,set2,...setN] produces a packet match if the packet does not match at least one of the sets. In other words, it is like NOT
match set1 OR NOT match set2 ... OR NOT match setN.
o +[!set1,!set2,...!setN] produces a packet match if the packet does not match any of the sets. In other words, it is like NOT match set1
AND NOT match set2 ... AND NOT match setN.
EXAMPLES
Example 1 - All IPv4 addresses except 192.168.3.4
!192.168.3.4
Example 2 - All IPv4 addresses except the network 192.168.1.0/24 and the host 10.2.3.4
!192.168.1.0/24,10.1.3.4
Example 3 - All IPv4 addresses except the range 192.168.1.3-192.168.1.12 and the network 10.0.0.0/8
!192.168.1.3-192.168.1.12,10.0.0.0/8
Example 4 - The network 192.168.1.0/24 except hosts 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.1.9
192.168.1.0/24!192.168.1.3,192.168.1.9
Example 5 - All parent zones except loc
any!loc
FILES
/etc/shorewall/hosts
/etc/shorewall/masq
/etc/shorewall/rules
/etc/shorewall/tcrules
SEE ALSO
shorewall(8), shorewall-accounting(5), shorewall-actions(5), shorewall-blacklist(5), shorewall-hosts(5), shorewall_interfaces(5),
shorewall-ipsets(5), shorewall-maclist(5), shorewall-masq(5), shorewall-nat(5), shorewall-netmap(5), shorewall-params(5),
shorewall-policy(5), shorewall-providers(5), shorewall-proxyarp(5), shorewall-rtrules(5), shorewall-routestopped(5), shorewall-rules(5),
shorewall.conf(5), shorewall-secmarks(5), shorewall-tcclasses(5), shorewall-tcdevices(5), shorewall-tcrules(5), shorewall-tos(5),
shorewall-tunnels(5), shorewall-zones(5)
NOTES
1. shorewall-ipsets
http://www.shorewall.net/manpages/shorewall-ipsets.html
[FIXME: source] 06/28/2012 SHOREWALL-EXCLUSION(5)