Sponsored Content
Contact Us Forum Support Area for Unregistered Users & Account Problems Google reporting UNIX.com as harmful site Post 302749269 by Neo on Friday 28th of December 2012 01:51:07 AM
Old 12-28-2012
Thanks!

Yes, we noticed this already and have contacted Google about this.

Hopefully, they will review this and correct this ASAP!
 

5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Cybersecurity

Google Error: This site may harm your computer.

Anyone else seeing this error on every search result on Google today: This site may harm your computer. Which links to this page: Malware Warning Which says: (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
10 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Csh Programming Considered Harmful

I have noticed a few posts asking questions about c shell scripting these past few days. This a good read for those that currently or are thinking about writing a csh script: Csh Programming Considered Harmful (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: ilikecows
9 Replies

3. Programming

Need best forum site for java (as for unix its unix.com)

Hi All, Can anyone help me for knowing the java best side forums. where i will get a quick responce like here , as i am having lot of question. Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: aish11
1 Replies

4. What is on Your Mind?

Changes to Google Site Search Location

We are going to move the Google Site Search that is located in the upper right hand corner of the site to the toolbar. Both are showing at the moment, and the plans is to create a UserCP option to "turn on" the Google Site Search where it is currently showing for users who prefer not to use the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
2 Replies

5. What is on Your Mind?

Google Site Search in Search Drop Down Menu (Again)

Have just added (after missing for some time), the latest version of Google Site Search for our site in the Navbar Search Menu: https://www.unix.com/members/1-albums215-picture791.png Cheers and Enjoy. Here is the URL for that link in case you need it: https://goo.gl/P8p82c (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
4 Replies
POST-REVIEW(1)							   User Commands						    POST-REVIEW(1)

NAME
post-review - post/update reviews to Review Board SYNOPSIS
post-review [-pond] [-r review_id] [changenum] OPTIONS
Review Request Options -p, --publish publish the review request immediately after submitting -r ID, --review-request-id=ID existing review request ID to update --revision-range=REVISION_RANGE generate the diff for review based on given revision range Server Options --server=SERVER specify a different Review Board server to use --submit-as=USERNAME user name to be recorded as the author of the review request, instead of the logged in user --username=USERNAME user name to be supplied to the reviewboard server --password=PASSWORD password to be supplied to the reviewboard server Basic Options --version show program's version number and exit -h, --help show this help message and exit -o, --open open a web browser to the review request page -n, --output-diff outputs a diff to the console and exits. Does not post Field Defaults Options --target-groups=TARGET_GROUPS names of the groups who will perform the review --target-people=TARGET_PEOPLE names of the people who will perform the review --summary=SUMMARY summary of the review --description=DESCRIPTION description of the review --description-file=DESCRIPTION_FILE text file containing a description of the review --testing-done=TESTING_DONE details of testing done --testing-done-file=TESTING_FILE text file containing details of testing done --branch=BRANCH affected branch --bugs-closed=BUGS_CLOSED list of bugs closed --change-only updates info from changelist, but does not upload a new diff (only available if your repository supports changesets) --tracking-branch=TRACKING Tracking branch from which your branch is derived (git only, defaults to origin/master) --p4-client=P4_CLIENT the Perforce client name that the review is in --p4-port=P4_PORT the Perforce servers IP address that the review is on -d, --debug display debug output --diff-filename=DIFF_FILENAME upload an existing diff file, instead of generating a new diff Git Options --guess-summary guess summary from the latest commit (git/hgsubversion only) --guess-description guess description based on commits on this branch (git/hgsubversion only) Git and Mercurial Options --parent=PARENT_BRANCH the parent branch this diff should be against (only available if your repository supports parent diffs) Subversion Options --repository-url=REPOSITORY_URL the url for a repository for creating a diff outside of a working copy (currently only supported by Subver- sion). Requires either --revision-rangeor --diff-filename options Perforce Options --diff-only uploads a new diff, but does not update info from changelist ClearCase Options --label=LABEL Specifies the label used for ClearCase. DESCRIPTION
post-review is intended to post a review from a local repository to the Review Board server, or update such an existing review. It works differently with different version-control systems. For CVS and Subversion, the review to post is the uncommited change in a working copy. With distributed VC systems (currently Git and Mercurial are supported), the review is a topic branch. Posting it is, technically, pushing it to the repository at the Review Board server. PerForce and ClearCase also seem to be supported but the author of this page fails to understand the details. Refer to undocumented(7) for more information on using them with this program. [A more detaild description can help] CONFIGURATION
post-review needs to be told of the address of the server to post to. This can come from several possible places: GIT property reviewboard.url For example, the following command will set a repository-specific property: git config --add reviewboard.url http://reviewboard.example.com Refer to git-config(1) for the full details. Subversion Property reviewboard:url The subversion property reviewboard:url may be set on the top-level directory. svn propset reviewboard:url http://reviewboard.example.com . Perforce Counters Rumour has it they exist and can even help in the configuration here. .reviewboardrc $HOME/.reviewboardrc The file .reviewboardrc can exist in either the top-level directory of the project or under the user's top-level directory. This file uses python syntax for assignments. It has two optionalmethods of defining the repository URL: REVIEWBOARD_URL A simple variable pointing to the server: REVIEWBOARD_URL = "http://reviewboard.example.com" TREES A directionary of subversion repositories to REVIEWBOARD_URL-s: TREES = { 'http://svn.example.com': { 'REVIEWBOARD_URL': 'http://rb.example.com', }, 'username@cvs.example.com:/cvsroot/cvs': { 'REVIEWBOARD_URL': 'http://rb.example.com', }, } EXAMPLES
post a new review from a working subversion copy: post-review This generates a new draft review. Refer to the "Field Defaults" options above to set non-empty values to some fields in the review. Alter- natively set them later through the web interface. Update that review, assuming its review number is 17: post-review -r 17 To post a review from a your GIT feature branch: git checkout -b new-feature main-branch emacs -f butterfly '.......' # or ed git commit post-review [That said, I can't really follow the documentation as to how post-review works on git/hg: how does it post the last diff only?] This does not create a new diff. Rather, it updates the existing one. In the following two examples, the review was not published. AUTHOR
post-review was written by Christian Hammond and David Trowbridge. This man page was written by Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com>. SEE ALSO
On-Line Documentation <http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/> post-review 0.8 March 2010 POST-REVIEW(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy