Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Ultra 10
Operating Systems Solaris Ultra 10 Post 302727051 by hicksd8 on Monday 5th of November 2012 02:50:44 PM
Old 11-05-2012
Was this a working disk on this system?

Or are you trying to add this disk to the system?

Was the disk definitely Solaris labelled before?

Or could the disk have been labelled on a Windows system?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Ultra 5

Can anyone tell me if the Sun Ultra 5 w/ 270 cpu is 32 or 64 bit? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jeremiebarber
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Ultra 10/30

Hi, I am planning to purchase a sun ultra 10 or 30, i was wondering what is the difference between them. I tried looking up for sun documentation and cannot find any info. Please help me. Thanks Soul (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: souldier
1 Replies

3. Solaris

Ultra 30/60

Not necessarily a Solaris question, but thought this the best place for it. My main Linux/OpenBSD workstation (really old athlon) is on its way out, and I am considering getting an Ultra 30 or 60 to replace it with. If I go with a dual proc 60 I'll get SMP support on Linux. Most systems I've... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: DraconianTimes
1 Replies

4. Solaris

I need to clone an ultra 1 onto and ultra 60

I need to move everything from an older ultra 1 onto a newer ultra 60 (OS and all) running SUNOS 5.5.1. Any suggestions on the best way to do this? Frank P.S. If you know of a document somewhere please let me know. (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: frankkahle
11 Replies

5. Solaris

Ultra-60 upgrade

Hi, I would like to upgrade the memory to 8GB and two more cpu's is it possbile to upgrade? Currently I have... # uname -a SunOS bdsn4003 5.8 Generic_117350-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60 # prtconf System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4u Memory size: 2048 Megabytes System... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jeelans
1 Replies

6. Solaris

Solaris 10 on Ultra 4

Has anyone successfully tried installing Solaris 10 on an Ultra 4?? The machine in question has a 300MHz SPARCIIi CPU and 1 GB of RAM which - according to the SUN doco should be enough. However when I try and install it just hangs on the "configuring Devices" message. I left it overnight to see... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: korfnz
2 Replies

7. Solaris

Ultra 24 Problem

Dear All, I Have problem at my console Ultra 24 Intel. OS : solaris 10 with kernel 13xxxx. Error message is : May 11 13:27:08 unknown agent: syslog May 11 13:27:08 agent agentServer parameter (xxxxx) is not a valid local hostname May 11 13:27:08 unknown agent: syslog May... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: mbah_jiman
8 Replies

8. Solaris

installing 2.6 and 2.5.1 on Ultra 80

Hi all, I must install 2.6 and 2.5.1 on ultra 80's. I need Operating Environment Installation CD p/n 704-6914-10 (Sept 99) or 704-7076-10 (Feb 2000)and also the manual "Installing Solaris 2.5.1 or Solaris 2.6 Software on 419+ MHz Systems" will be really helpfull. I can not reach that CD... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: endoavour
0 Replies

9. Solaris

How to install an Ultra 10...?

I have a nice Ultra 10 (440 MHz, 1 GB RAM, 40 GB Disk, Elite3D m6 Graphics), which probably needs a new install. Currently it is running Solaris 10 with Java Desktop. Imho Java Desktop slows the computer a little bit down. Since a few days a have also a SunPCi II card. Now I want to reinstall... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: flowerking
3 Replies

10. Solaris

Solaris 2.5.1 and 2.6 on Ultra 80

Hi, as being discussed in this Thread some time ago, I need the "Solaris Operating Environment Installation CD" to be able to install Solaris releases before 7 on my lovely U80. Part number is 704-7076-10. Does anyone still have this hanging around? Regards, Oli ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: oreissig
5 Replies
MBRLABEL(8)						    BSD System Manager's Manual 					       MBRLABEL(8)

NAME
mbrlabel -- update disk label from MBR label(s) SYNOPSIS
mbrlabel [-fqrw] [-s sector] device DESCRIPTION
mbrlabel is used to update a NetBSD disk label from the Master Boot Record (MBR) label(s) found on disks that were previously used on DOS/Windows systems (or other MBR using systems). mbrlabel scans the MBR contained in the very first block of the disk (or the block specified through the -s flag), then walks through every extended partition found and generates additional partition entries for the disk from the MBRs found in those extended partitions. Each MBR partition which does not have an equivalent partition in the disk label (equivalent in having the same size and offset) is added to the first free partition slot in the disk label. A free partition slot is defined as one with an fstype of 'unused' and a size of zero ('0'). If there are not enough free slots in the disk label, a warning will be issued. The raw partition (typically partition c, but d on i386 and some other platforms) is left alone during this process. By default, the proposed changed disk label will be displayed and no disk label update will occur. Available options: -f Force an update, even if there has been no change. -q Performs operations in a quiet fashion. -r In conjunction with -w, also update the on-disk label. -s sector Specifies the logical sector number that has to be read from the disk in order to find the MBR. Useful if the disk has remapping drivers on it and the MBR is located in a non-standard place. Defaults to 0. -w Update the in-core label if it has been changed. See also -r. SEE ALSO
disklabel(8), dkctl(8), fdisk(8), mbr(8) HISTORY
The mbrlabel command appeared in NetBSD 1.4. BSD
April 5, 2010 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy