Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Shell quoting rules for other languages programmers Post 302717339 by wyderkat on Thursday 18th of October 2012 04:13:27 AM
Old 10-18-2012
You are right, globbing is not expanded in any quoting. And single quotes
suppose to be faster than double quotes. But is it big difference
in performance?

Before I've investigated that problem I was thinking that eval is for odd
situation, like you. But now it looks to me like we should use it quite often!
For example, can anybody tell me how to do last line without eval:

USER_A=tom
USER_B=geoff
USER_C=anna
CURRENT='$USER_B' # without single quotes it would be just value copy
eval echo $CURRENT
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers

Shell scripting & programming languages

If I want to do high-end 3d animation, what skell scripting languages, and programming languages shoul I learn? If you know any good resources for learning these languages they would be appreciated. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: aloysius1001
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Perl - Programmers manual online?

I have never programmed in Perl (insert laughter, mock, etc. here ____) - so I need a sort of "Programming in Perl" covering the basics. I now have two Perl books, one is a 5 volume Unix resource kit, the other is "Mastering algorithms with Perl" - none of them explains how to produce "hello,... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: AtleRamsli
11 Replies

3. News, Links, Events and Announcements

Good Essays For Programmers

Check the essays out. http://www.paulgraham.com (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: photon
0 Replies

4. What is on Your Mind?

Suggested venues to look for advanced C programmers

Can someone suggest any online venues to assist in recruiting a senior C programmer (looking for someone interested in working on kerberos code). I've tried a bunch of the open source and higher ed lists (this is for Univ. of Michigan). The commercial services such as Dice or monster yield a... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: painman
7 Replies

5. What is on Your Mind?

Programming languages polyglots: how many languages you know?

Post what languages (including scripting) you know, why and where you think that language is most usable. Also include libraries in which you're really good at (libusb, gtk, qt, etc). assembly? C or C++? perl or python? pascal? bash or csh/tcsh? opengl? gtk or qt? mono? (27 Replies)
Discussion started by: redoubtable
27 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Shell quoting problem while editing a remote file using sed

value of i = solarisbox ssh $i "cat /etc/hosts | sed "s/$i\.local\.//" | sed "s/$i\./$i/" | sed "s/$i/$i.sol.com/" > /usr/users/chidori/edit_hosts"While running the above one liner its i am not able to make the changes and write it to the file /usr/users/chidori/edit_hosts . I know there is a... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: chidori
2 Replies

7. Programming

Hello UNIX programmers

i have MOTIF installed X11 a easy program is saved as hello.c there is the following message where can i get the X11/intrinsic.h , file ??? need help to compile my system : MX-16 Linux Debian Jessie / i386 hans@mx1:~/Documents $ cc push.c -o push -lXm -lXt -lX11 In file included from... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Zabo
0 Replies

8. Forum Support Area for Unregistered Users & Account Problems

Trojan is detected when I visit Programmers forum

When I visit Programmers forum my ESET Nod32 detects TrojanDownloader.Pegel.BH.trojan I don't know when it started, as I visited the site today after staying off-line a few days. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: migurus
2 Replies

9. What is on Your Mind?

Multics Systems Programmers Manual as of 1969-04-01, comprising 996 PDF Files

While working on my current "UNIX history project" I ran across this: Jerry Saltzer created an online scanned copy of the Multics Systems Programmers' Manual (MSPM) in this directory. Based on the 1969-04-01 MSPM, the repo comprising 996 PDF files. In order to help preserver the MSPM, ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Neo
1 Replies

10. What is on Your Mind?

The poorest of computer users are programmers...

Hi guys and gals... A mildly humourous blog from 2013, but I come into this category... ;oDD Languager: The Poorest Computer Users are Programmers (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
0 Replies
GETOPT(1)							   User Commands							 GETOPT(1)

NAME
getopt - parse command options (enhanced) SYNOPSIS
getopt optstring parameters getopt [options] [--] optstring parameters getopt [options] -o|--options optstring [options] [--] parameters DESCRIPTION
getopt is used to break up (parse) options in command lines for easy parsing by shell procedures, and to check for legal options. It uses the GNU getopt(3) routines to do this. The parameters getopt is called with can be divided into two parts: options which modify the way getopt will parse (options and -o|--options optstring in the SYNOPSIS), and the parameters which are to be parsed (parameters in the SYNOPSIS). The second part will start at the first non-option parameter that is not an option argument, or after the first occurrence of `--'. If no `-o' or `--options' option is found in the first part, the first parameter of the second part is used as the short options string. If the environment variable GETOPT_COMPATIBLE is set, or if its first parameter is not an option (does not start with a `-', this is the first format in the SYNOPSIS), getopt will generate output that is compatible with that of other versions of getopt(1). It will still do parameter shuffling and recognize optional arguments (see section COMPATIBILITY for more information). Traditional implementations of getopt(1) are unable to cope with whitespace and other (shell-specific) special characters in arguments and non-option parameters. To solve this problem, this implementation can generate quoted output which must once again be interpreted by the shell (usually by using the eval command). This has the effect of preserving those characters, but you must call getopt in a way that is no longer compatible with other versions (the second or third format in the SYNOPSIS). To determine whether this enhanced version of getopt(1) is installed, a special test option (-T) can be used. OPTIONS
-a, --alternative Allow long options to start with a single `-'. -h, --help Output a small usage guide and exit successfully. No other output is generated. -l, --longoptions longopts The long (multi-character) options to be recognized. More than one option name may be specified at once, by separating the names with commas. This option may be given more than once, the longopts are cumulative. Each long option name in longopts may be fol- lowed by one colon to indicate it has a required argument, and by two colons to indicate it has an optional argument. -n, --name progname The name that will be used by the getopt(3) routines when it reports errors. Note that errors of getopt(1) are still reported as coming from getopt. -o, --options shortopts The short (one-character) options to be recognized. If this option is not found, the first parameter of getopt that does not start with a `-' (and is not an option argument) is used as the short options string. Each short option character in shortopts may be followed by one colon to indicate it has a required argument, and by two colons to indicate it has an optional argument. The first character of shortopts may be `+' or `-' to influence the way options are parsed and output is generated (see section SCANNING MODES for details). -q, --quiet Disable error reporting by getopt(3). -Q, --quiet-output Do not generate normal output. Errors are still reported by getopt(3), unless you also use -q. -s, --shell shell Set quoting conventions to those of shell. If no -s argument is found, the BASH conventions are used. Valid arguments are currently `sh' `bash', `csh', and `tcsh'. -u, --unquoted Do not quote the output. Note that whitespace and special (shell-dependent) characters can cause havoc in this mode (like they do with other getopt(1) implementations). -T, --test Test if your getopt(1) is this enhanced version or an old version. This generates no output, and sets the error status to 4. Other implementations of getopt(1), and this version if the environment variable GETOPT_COMPATIBLE is set, will return `--' and error sta- tus 0. -V, --version Output version information and exit successfully. No other output is generated. PARSING
This section specifies the format of the second part of the parameters of getopt (the parameters in the SYNOPSIS). The next section (OUT- PUT) describes the output that is generated. These parameters were typically the parameters a shell function was called with. Care must be taken that each parameter the shell function was called with corresponds to exactly one parameter in the parameter list of getopt (see the EXAMPLES). All parsing is done by the GNU getopt(3) routines. The parameters are parsed from left to right. Each parameter is classified as a short option, a long option, an argument to an option, or a non-option parameter. A simple short option is a `-' followed by a short option character. If the option has a required argument, it may be written directly after the option character or as the next parameter (ie. separated by whitespace on the command line). If the option has an optional argu- ment, it must be written directly after the option character if present. It is possible to specify several short options after one `-', as long as all (except possibly the last) do not have required or optional arguments. A long option normally begins with `--' followed by the long option name. If the option has a required argument, it may be written directly after the long option name, separated by `=', or as the next argument (ie. separated by whitespace on the command line). If the option has an optional argument, it must be written directly after the long option name, separated by `=', if present (if you add the `=' but nothing behind it, it is interpreted as if no argument was present; this is a slight bug, see the BUGS). Long options may be abbrevi- ated, as long as the abbreviation is not ambiguous. Each parameter not starting with a `-', and not a required argument of a previous option, is a non-option parameter. Each parameter after a `--' parameter is always interpreted as a non-option parameter. If the environment variable POSIXLY_CORRECT is set, or if the short option string started with a `+', all remaining parameters are interpreted as non-option parameters as soon as the first non-option parameter is found. OUTPUT
Output is generated for each element described in the previous section. Output is done in the same order as the elements are specified in the input, except for non-option parameters. Output can be done in compatible (unquoted) mode, or in such way that whitespace and other special characters within arguments and non-option parameters are preserved (see QUOTING). When the output is processed in the shell script, it will seem to be composed of distinct elements that can be processed one by one (by using the shift command in most shell lan- guages). This is imperfect in unquoted mode, as elements can be split at unexpected places if they contain whitespace or special charac- ters. If there are problems parsing the parameters, for example because a required argument is not found or an option is not recognized, an error will be reported on stderr, there will be no output for the offending element, and a non-zero error status is returned. For a short option, a single `-' and the option character are generated as one parameter. If the option has an argument, the next parameter will be the argument. If the option takes an optional argument, but none was found, the next parameter will be generated but be empty in quoting mode, but no second parameter will be generated in unquoted (compatible) mode. Note that many other getopt(1) implementations do not support optional arguments. If several short options were specified after a single `-', each will be present in the output as a separate parameter. For a long option, `--' and the full option name are generated as one parameter. This is done regardless whether the option was abbreviated or specified with a single `-' in the input. Arguments are handled as with short options. Normally, no non-option parameters output is generated until all options and their arguments have been generated. Then `--' is generated as a single parameter, and after it the non-option parameters in the order they were found, each as a separate parameter. Only if the first character of the short options string was a `-', non-option parameter output is generated at the place they are found in the input (this is not supported if the first format of the SYNOPSIS is used; in that case all preceding occurrences of `-' and `+' are ignored). QUOTING
In compatible mode, whitespace or 'special' characters in arguments or non-option parameters are not handled correctly. As the output is fed to the shell script, the script does not know how it is supposed to break the output into separate parameters. To circumvent this problem, this implementation offers quoting. The idea is that output is generated with quotes around each parameter. When this output is once again fed to the shell (usually by a shell eval command), it is split correctly into separate parameters. Quoting is not enabled if the environment variable GETOPT_COMPATIBLE is set, if the first form of the SYNOPSIS is used, or if the option `-u' is found. Different shells use different quoting conventions. You can use the `-s' option to select the shell you are using. The following shells are currently supported: `sh', `bash', `csh' and `tcsh'. Actually, only two `flavors' are distinguished: sh-like quoting conventions and csh-like quoting conventions. Chances are that if you use another shell script language, one of these flavors can still be used. SCANNING MODES
The first character of the short options string may be a `-' or a `+' to indicate a special scanning mode. If the first calling form in the SYNOPSIS is used they are ignored; the environment variable POSIXLY_CORRECT is still examined, though. If the first character is `+', or if the environment variable POSIXLY_CORRECT is set, parsing stops as soon as the first non-option parame- ter (ie. a parameter that does not start with a `-') is found that is not an option argument. The remaining parameters are all interpreted as non-option parameters. If the first character is a `-', non-option parameters are outputted at the place where they are found; in normal operation, they are all collected at the end of output after a `--' parameter has been generated. Note that this `--' parameter is still generated, but it will always be the last parameter in this mode. COMPATIBILITY
This version of getopt(1) is written to be as compatible as possible to other versions. Usually you can just replace them with this version without any modifications, and with some advantages. If the first character of the first parameter of getopt is not a `-', getopt goes into compatibility mode. It will interpret its first parameter as the string of short options, and all other arguments will be parsed. It will still do parameter shuffling (ie. all non-option parameters are outputted at the end), unless the environment variable POSIXLY_CORRECT is set. The environment variable GETOPT_COMPATIBLE forces getopt into compatibility mode. Setting both this environment variable and POSIXLY_COR- RECT offers 100% compatibility for `difficult' programs. Usually, though, neither is needed. In compatibility mode, leading `-' and `+' characters in the short options string are ignored. RETURN CODES
getopt returns error code 0 for successful parsing, 1 if getopt(3) returns errors, 2 if it does not understand its own parameters, 3 if an internal error occurs like out-of-memory, and 4 if it is called with -T. EXAMPLES
Example scripts for (ba)sh and (t)csh are provided with the getopt(1) distribution, and are optionally installed in /usr/share/doc/util- linux/examples. ENVIRONMENT
POSIXLY_CORRECT This environment variable is examined by the getopt(3) routines. If it is set, parsing stops as soon as a parameter is found that is not an option or an option argument. All remaining parameters are also interpreted as non-option parameters, regardless whether they start with a `-'. GETOPT_COMPATIBLE Forces getopt to use the first calling format as specified in the SYNOPSIS. BUGS
getopt(3) can parse long options with optional arguments that are given an empty optional argument (but can not do this for short options). This getopt(1) treats optional arguments that are empty as if they were not present. The syntax if you do not want any short option variables at all is not very intuitive (you have to set them explicitly to the empty string). AUTHOR
Frodo Looijaard <frodo@frodo.looijaard.name> SEE ALSO
getopt(3), bash(1), tcsh(1). AVAILABILITY
The getopt command is part of the util-linux package and is available from ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/. util-linux July 2009 GETOPT(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy