10-17-2012
Quote:
The executable gets build in HP Unix bit in Linux, it fails saying
A binary built on HP (HP-UX?) will probably not run on a Linux box.
9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Programming
This may/may not be a long answer to a short question.
I am learning the C programming language at home.I have seen some good books on the UNIX programming enviroment.However, there were a few books that hinted towards the Linux programming enviroment.Is there any difference between the two as... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: perrylx
1 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Ok, I'm confused.
Can someone answer these (stupid) questions please for me?
1. What is the difference between unix and linux?
2. Is FreeBSD a unix distribution?
3. If not, then what is Unix? I actually gone to Unix.com because I thought this is it's official website where I could download... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: RellioN
1 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
OK, I've used various versions of UNIX(Solaris, HPUX, etc..) over the years. Now the organization I work for is leaning towards more Linux based systems(Redhat, Suse, etc..)
I do see differences in in comands and how to accomplish basic adminstration, but nothing mind blowing.
So, what is it... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: pbonilla
5 Replies
4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
:confused: Hi All
Can anyone help me in finding the answer of the question mentioned below.
What is the difference between Unix & linux ?
Thanks in Advance to all
CSaha (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: csaha
1 Replies
5. AIX
Sir ,
Can any body explain the difference between linux , Unix and AIx on command Reference all the command on AIx and unix is same or not
please reply (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: arif185
2 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi,
I am using some codes that have been ported from unix to linux, and now the sorting no longer results in the desired ordering. I'm hoping to find a way to mimic the unix sort command in linux. The input file is structured the following:
$> cat file.txt... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: aj.schaeffer
6 Replies
7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi I am new to linux
I have dout waht is the difference between UNIX and LINUX
Is there any soft for insatallation for UNIX OS
Thanks (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: sanjaya
0 Replies
8. Red Hat
Hi Guys,
I am trying to test installation of a local rpm to my RHEL5 server. I am expecting it to fail as a previous version of the same package name exists. On using rpm -i this behaves as expected but yum install does not pick up the conflict. Here is the element of my SPEC file with the... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: gazza-o
5 Replies
9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
hi experts please tell me the real difference between unix and linux at kernel structure (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: linurag
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT CENTOS
execstack
execstack(8) System Manager's Manual execstack(8)
NAME
execstack - tool to set, clear, or query executable stack flag of ELF binaries and shared libraries
SYNOPSIS
execstack [OPTION...] [FILES]
DESCRIPTION
execstack is a program which sets, clears, or queries executable stack flag of ELF binaries and shared libraries. Linux has in the past
allowed execution of instructions on the stack and there are lots of binaries and shared libraries assuming this behaviour. Furthermore,
GCC trampoline code for e.g. nested functions requires executable stack on many architectures. To avoid breaking binaries and shared
libraries which need executable stack, ELF binaries and shared libraries now can be marked as requiring executable stack or not requiring
it. This marking is done through the p_flags field in the PT_GNU_STACK program header entry. If the marking is missing, kernel or dynamic
linker need to assume it might need executable stack. The marking is done automatically by recent GCC versions (objects using trampolines
on the stack are marked as requiring executable stack, all other newly built objects are marked as not requiring it) and linker collects
these markings into marking of the whole binary or shared library. The user can override this at assembly time (through --execstack or
--noexecstack assembler options), at link time (through -z execstack or -z noexecstack linker options) and using the execstack tool also on
an already linker binary or shared library. This tool is especially useful for third party shared libraries where it is known that they
don't need executable stack or testing proves it.
OPTIONS
-s --set-execstack
Mark binary or shared library as requiring executable stack.
-c --clear-execstack
Mark binary or shared library as not requiring executable stack.
-q --query
Query executable stack marking of binaries and shared libraries. For each file it prints either - when executable stack is not
required, X when executable stack is required or ? when it is unknown whether the object requires or doesn't require executable
stack (the marking is missing).
-V Print execstack version and exit.
-? --help
Print help message.
--usage
Print a short usage message.
ARGUMENTS
Command line arguments should be names of ELF binaries and shared libraries which should be modified or queried.
EXAMPLES
# execstack -s ~/lib/libfoo.so.1
will mark ~/lib/libfoo.so.1 as requiring executable stack.
# execstack -c ~/bin/bar
will mark ~/bin/bar as not requiring executable stack.
# execstack -q ~/lib/libfoo.so.1 ~/bin/bar
will query executable stack marking of the given files.
SEE ALSO
ld.so(8).
BUGS
execstack doesn't support yet marking of executables if they do not have PT_GNU_STACK program header entry nor they have room for program
segment header table growth.
AUTHORS
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>.
28 October 2003 execstack(8)