can never ever be the output of an
command, we cannot know what the OP has really done and what has been the real output.
In his first post, the OP stated:
Quote:
It seems you have totally missed my point.
We both have made assumption about what has happened. You seem to be sure that the last output in post3 has been something with the names of the files repeated two times... and that the OP missed the different subdirs despite not using -execdir, which is a bit strange.
I assumed that that output has been duplicated by the OP in posting, and that he wrote the truth in his first post. So I just assured him that my find works as expected, not knowing what's going on there.
Re-reading all the thread, you can surely be right.
--
Bye
Hi All,
i am writing a shell script in korn shell
which deletes all the files in a directory
once in every 10DAYS.
the directory has different format files.
the script has something like this;
cd /home/data/pavi
echo "Please Enter the Number of Days to search for"
read DAYS... (2 Replies)
Hi,
I'm using the following command to get a list of files on the system.
find /releases -type f -exec ls -l > /home/sebarry/list.txt '{}' \;
however, its searching a directory I don't want it to search so I know I have to use prune but I don't seem to be able to get prune and exec to work... (1 Reply)
Hi People,
I have a directory full of compressed files (.Z extention)
In many of these files there is a string pattern (3800078163033)
I want to find all file names which contain this string in their text.
Regards,
Abhishek (2 Replies)
Hi
I have a little problem with the find command in a script that I'm writing. The script should check if there are some files younger than 100 seconds and then syncronise them with rsync.
My find command:
find -type f -cmin -100 -exec rsync -a --delete directory1/ directory2/
When I... (8 Replies)
Hello All,
Is there a way to make exec do a couple of operations on a single input from find?
For example,
find . -type d -exec ls -l "{}" ";"
I would like to give the result of each "ls -l" in the above to a wc. Is that possible?
I want to ls -l | wc -l inside exec. How do I... (1 Reply)
Hi all,
Please could someone help with the following command requirement.
I basically need to find files NEWER than a given file and order the result on time.
My attempt so far is as follows:
find . -newer <file_name> -exec ls -lrt {} ;\
But I dont seem to get the right result... (12 Replies)
Hi,
I have two scripts that remove files. One works fine and is coded
find -name "syst*" -mtime +1 -exec rm {} \;
The other is almost the same - only thing missing is the '\'. On that script though I keep getting:
rm syst1202.file ?
etc
Does the \ make that difference or is it a... (3 Replies)
Hi all,
I am trying to find files newer than a given file and them mv them to a new location.
So I far I have:
find . ! -newer <file_name> -exec ls -l {} \;
and
find . ! -newer <file_name> -exec mv /TEMP_LOCATION {} \;
find is not liking this.
Anyone know how to modify the last... (2 Replies)
Hello.
From a script, a command for a test is use :
find /home/user_install -maxdepth 1 -type f -newer /tmp/000_skel_file_deb ! -newer /tmp/000_skel_file_end -name '.bashrc' -o -name '.profile' -o -name '.gtkrc-2.0' -o -name '.i18n' -o -name '.inputrc'
Tha command... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jcdole
3 Replies
LEARN ABOUT NETBSD
merge
MERGE(1) General Commands Manual MERGE(1)NAME
merge - three-way file merge
SYNOPSIS
merge [ options ] file1 file2 file3
DESCRIPTION
merge incorporates all changes that lead from file2 to file3 into file1. The result ordinarily goes into file1. merge is useful for com-
bining separate changes to an original. Suppose file2 is the original, and both file1 and file3 are modifications of file2. Then merge
combines both changes.
A conflict occurs if both file1 and file3 have changes in a common segment of lines. If a conflict is found, merge normally outputs a
warning and brackets the conflict with and lines. A typical conflict will look like this:
file A
lines in file A
=======
lines in file B
file B
If there are conflicts, the user should edit the result and delete one of the alternatives.
OPTIONS -A Output conflicts using the -A style of diff3(1), if supported by diff3. This merges all changes leading from file2 to file3 into
file1, and generates the most verbose output.
-E, -e These options specify conflict styles that generate less information than -A. See diff3(1) for details. The default is -E. With
-e, merge does not warn about conflicts.
-L label
This option may be given up to three times, and specifies labels to be used in place of the corresponding file names in conflict
reports. That is, merge -L x -L y -L z a b c generates output that looks like it came from files x, y and z instead of from files
a, b and c.
-p Send results to standard output instead of overwriting file1.
-q Quiet; do not warn about conflicts.
-V Print version number.
DIAGNOSTICS
Exit status is 0 for no conflicts, 1 for some conflicts, 2 for trouble.
IDENTIFICATION
Author: Walter F. Tichy.
Manual Page Revision: ; Release Date: .
Copyright (C) 1982, 1988, 1989 Walter F. Tichy.
Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 Paul Eggert.
SEE ALSO diff3(1), diff(1), rcsmerge(1), co(1).
BUGS
It normally does not make sense to merge binary files as if they were text, but merge tries to do it anyway.
GNU MERGE(1)