Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers [Solved] weird in find -exec command Post 302695297 by alister on Sunday 2nd of September 2012 02:51:24 PM
Old 09-02-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lem
There, not here. Not with my GNU find, which works as expected.

Please, again, try yourself:
I don't need to try anything. Looking at your output, your test results are exactly what I would expect. However, your test is not relevant. Your file layout does not match the OP's (if it does, the sample data in post #3 is wrong).

It seems you have totally missed my point.

Regards,
Alister
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

find command exec error

Hi All, i am writing a shell script in korn shell which deletes all the files in a directory once in every 10DAYS. the directory has different format files. the script has something like this; cd /home/data/pavi echo "Please Enter the Number of Days to search for" read DAYS... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: pavan_test
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Find command with prune and exec

Hi, I'm using the following command to get a list of files on the system. find /releases -type f -exec ls -l > /home/sebarry/list.txt '{}' \; however, its searching a directory I don't want it to search so I know I have to use prune but I don't seem to be able to get prune and exec to work... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Sebarry
1 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

find command with -exec

Hi People, I have a directory full of compressed files (.Z extention) In many of these files there is a string pattern (3800078163033) I want to find all file names which contain this string in their text. Regards, Abhishek (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: max29583
2 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to get the exit code of -exec in the find command

Hi I have a little problem with the find command in a script that I'm writing. The script should check if there are some files younger than 100 seconds and then syncronise them with rsync. My find command: find -type f -cmin -100 -exec rsync -a --delete directory1/ directory2/ When I... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: oku
8 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

find command to use multiple -exec options

Hello All, Is there a way to make exec do a couple of operations on a single input from find? For example, find . -type d -exec ls -l "{}" ";" I would like to give the result of each "ls -l" in the above to a wc. Is that possible? I want to ls -l | wc -l inside exec. How do I... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: prasanna1157
1 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

find command with -exec

Hi all, Please could someone help with the following command requirement. I basically need to find files NEWER than a given file and order the result on time. My attempt so far is as follows: find . -newer <file_name> -exec ls -lrt {} ;\ But I dont seem to get the right result... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: jonnyd
12 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

What does the '\' in find -exec command

Hi, I have two scripts that remove files. One works fine and is coded find -name "syst*" -mtime +1 -exec rm {} \; The other is almost the same - only thing missing is the '\'. On that script though I keep getting: rm syst1202.file ? etc Does the \ make that difference or is it a... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Grueben
3 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Find and move command with exec

Hi all, I am trying to find files newer than a given file and them mv them to a new location. So I far I have: find . ! -newer <file_name> -exec ls -l {} \; and find . ! -newer <file_name> -exec mv /TEMP_LOCATION {} \; find is not liking this. Anyone know how to modify the last... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jonnyd
2 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Linux find command seems to not transmit all the result to the '-exec command'

Hello. From a script, a command for a test is use : find /home/user_install -maxdepth 1 -type f -newer /tmp/000_skel_file_deb ! -newer /tmp/000_skel_file_end -name '.bashrc' -o -name '.profile' -o -name '.gtkrc-2.0' -o -name '.i18n' -o -name '.inputrc' Tha command... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jcdole
3 Replies
Test::Tester(3) 					User Contributed Perl Documentation					   Test::Tester(3)

NAME
Test::Tester - Ease testing test modules built with Test::Builder SYNOPSIS
use Test::Tester tests => 6; use Test::MyStyle; check_test( sub { is_mystyle_eq("this", "that", "not eq"); }, { ok => 0, # expect this to fail name => "not eq", diag => "Expected: 'this' Got: 'that'", } ); or use Test::Tester; use Test::More tests => 3; use Test::MyStyle; my ($premature, @results) = run_tests( sub { is_database_alive("dbname"); } ); # now use Test::More::like to check the diagnostic output like($results[0]->{diag}, "/^Database ping took \d+ seconds$"/, "diag"); DESCRIPTION
If you have written a test module based on Test::Builder then Test::Tester allows you to test it with the minimum of effort. HOW TO USE (THE EASY WAY) From version 0.08 Test::Tester no longer requires you to included anything special in your test modules. All you need to do is use Test::Tester; in your test script before any other Test::Builder based modules and away you go. Other modules based on Test::Builder can be used to help with the testing. In fact you can even use functions from your module to test other functions from the same module (while this is possible it is probably not a good idea, if your module has bugs, then using it to test itself may give the wrong answers). The easiest way to test is to do something like check_test( sub { is_mystyle_eq("this", "that", "not eq") }, { ok => 0, # we expect the test to fail name => "not eq", diag => "Expected: 'this' Got: 'that'", } ); this will execute the is_mystyle_eq test, capturing it's results and checking that they are what was expected. You may need to examine the test results in a more flexible way, for example, the diagnostic output may be quite long or complex or it may involve something that you cannot predict in advance like a timestamp. In this case you can get direct access to the test results: my ($premature, @results) = run_tests( sub { is_database_alive("dbname"); } ); like($result[0]->{diag}, "/^Database ping took \d+ seconds$"/, "diag"); We cannot predict how long the database ping will take so we use Test::More's like() test to check that the diagnostic string is of the right form. HOW TO USE (THE HARD WAY) This is here for backwards compatibility only Make your module use the Test::Tester::Capture object instead of the Test::Builder one. How to do this depends on your module but assuming that your module holds the Test::Builder object in $Test and that all your test routines access it through $Test then providing a function something like this sub set_builder { $Test = shift; } should allow your test scripts to do Test::YourModule::set_builder(Test::Tester->capture); and after that any tests inside your module will captured. TEST RESULTS
The result of each test is captured in a hash. These hashes are the same as the hashes returned by Test::Builder->details but with a couple of extra fields. These fields are documented in Test::Builder in the details() function ok Did the test pass? actual_ok Did the test really pass? That is, did the pass come from Test::Builder->ok() or did it pass because it was a TODO test? name The name supplied for the test. type What kind of test? Possibilities include, skip, todo etc. See Test::Builder for more details. reason The reason for the skip, todo etc. See Test::Builder for more details. These fields are exclusive to Test::Tester. diag Any diagnostics that were output for the test. This only includes diagnostics output after the test result is declared. Note that Test::Builder ensures that any diagnostics end in a and it in earlier versions of Test::Tester it was essential that you have the final in your expected diagnostics. From version 0.10 onwards, Test::Tester will add the if you forgot it. It will not add a if you are expecting no diagnostics. See below for help tracking down hard to find space and tab related problems. depth This allows you to check that your test module is setting the correct value for $Test::Builder::Level and thus giving the correct file and line number when a test fails. It is calculated by looking at caller() and $Test::Builder::Level. It should count how many subroutines there are before jumping into the function you are testing. So for example in run_tests( sub { my_test_function("a", "b") } ); the depth should be 1 and in sub deeper { my_test_function("a", "b") } run_tests(sub { deeper() }); depth should be 2, that is 1 for the sub {} and one for deeper(). This might seem a little complex but if your tests look like the simple examples in this doc then you don't need to worry as the depth will always be 1 and that's what Test::Tester expects by default. Note: if you do not specify a value for depth in check_test() then it automatically compares it against 1, if you really want to skip the depth test then pass in undef. Note: depth will not be correctly calculated for tests that run from a signal handler or an END block or anywhere else that hides the call stack. Some of Test::Tester's functions return arrays of these hashes, just like Test::Builder->details. That is, the hash for the first test will be array element 1 (not 0). Element 0 will not be a hash it will be a string which contains any diagnostic output that came before the first test. This should usually be empty, if it's not, it means something output diagnostics before any test results showed up. SPACES AND TABS
Appearances can be deceptive, especially when it comes to emptiness. If you are scratching your head trying to work out why Test::Tester is saying that your diagnostics are wrong when they look perfectly right then the answer is probably whitespace. From version 0.10 on, Test::Tester surrounds the expected and got diag values with single quotes to make it easier to spot trailing whitesapce. So in this example # Got diag (5 bytes): # 'abcd ' # Expected diag (4 bytes): # 'abcd' it is quite clear that there is a space at the end of the first string. Another way to solve this problem is to use colour and inverse video on an ANSI terminal, see below COLOUR below if you want this. Unfortunately this is sometimes not enough, neither colour nor quotes will help you with problems involving tabs, other non-printing characters and certain kinds of problems inherent in Unicode. To deal with this, you can switch Test::Tester into a mode whereby all "tricky" characters are shown as {xx}. Tricky characters are those with ASCII code less than 33 or higher than 126. This makes the output more difficult to read but much easier to find subtle differences between strings. To turn on this mode either call show_space() in your test script or set the TESTTESTERSPACE environment variable to be a true value. The example above would then look like # Got diag (5 bytes): # abcdx{20} # Expected diag (4 bytes): # abcd COLOUR
If you prefer to use colour as a means of finding tricky whitespace characters then you can set the TESTTESTCOLOUR environment variable to a comma separated pair of colours, the first for the foreground, the second for the background. For example "white,red" will print white text on a red background. This requires the Term::ANSIColor module. You can specify any colour that would be acceptable to the Term::ANSIColor::color function. If you spell colour differently, that's no problem. The TESTTESTERCOLOR variable also works (if both are set then the British spelling wins out). EXPORTED FUNCTIONS
($premature, @results) = run_tests(&test_sub) &test_sub is a reference to a subroutine. run_tests runs the subroutine in $test_sub and captures the results of any tests inside it. You can run more than 1 test inside this subroutine if you like. $premature is a string containing any diagnostic output from before the first test. @results is an array of test result hashes. cmp_result(\%result, \%expect, $name) \%result is a ref to a test result hash. \%expect is a ref to a hash of expected values for the test result. cmp_result compares the result with the expected values. If any differences are found it outputs diagnostics. You may leave out any field from the expected result and cmp_result will not do the comparison of that field. cmp_results(@results, @expects, $name) @results is a ref to an array of test results. @expects is a ref to an array of hash refs. cmp_results checks that the results match the expected results and if any differences are found it outputs diagnostics. It first checks that the number of elements in @results and @expects is the same. Then it goes through each result checking it against the expected result as in cmp_result() above. ($premature, @results) = check_tests(&test_sub, @expects, $name) &test_sub is a reference to a subroutine. @expect is a ref to an array of hash refs which are expected test results. check_tests combines run_tests and cmp_tests into a single call. It also checks if the tests died at any stage. It returns the same values as run_tests, so you can further examine the test results if you need to. ($premature, @results) = check_test(&test_sub, \%expect, $name) &test_sub is a reference to a subroutine. \%expect is a ref to an hash of expected values for the test result. check_test is a wrapper around check_tests. It combines run_tests and cmp_tests into a single call, checking if the test died. It assumes that only a single test is run inside &test_sub and include a test to make sure this is true. It returns the same values as run_tests, so you can further examine the test results if you need to. show_space() Turn on the escaping of characters as described in the SPACES AND TABS section. HOW IT WORKS
Normally, a test module (let's call it Test:MyStyle) calls Test::Builder->new to get the Test::Builder object. Test::MyStyle calls methods on this object to record information about test results. When Test::Tester is loaded, it replaces Test::Builder's new() method with one which returns a Test::Tester::Delegate object. Most of the time this object behaves as the real Test::Builder object. Any methods that are called are delegated to the real Test::Builder object so everything works perfectly. However once we go into test mode, the method calls are no longer passed to the real Test::Builder object, instead they go to the Test::Tester::Capture object. This object seems exactly like the real Test::Builder object, except, instead of outputting test results and diagnostics, it just records all the information for later analysis. SEE ALSO
Test::Builder the source of testing goodness. Test::Builder::Tester for an alternative approach to the problem tackled by Test::Tester - captures the strings output by Test::Builder. This means you cannot get separate access to the individual pieces of information and you must predict exactly what your test will output. AUTHOR
This module is copyright 2005 Fergal Daly <fergal@esatclear.ie>, some parts are based on other people's work. Plan handling lifted from Test::More. written by Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>. Test::Tester::Capture is a cut down and hacked up version of Test::Builder. Test::Builder was written by chromatic <chromatic@wgz.org> and Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>. LICENSE
Under the same license as Perl itself See http://www.perl.com/perl/misc/Artistic.html perl v5.16.2 2011-11-30 Test::Tester(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy