Sponsored Content
Special Forums IP Networking telnet for port 5433 is not working while it works for port 22 Post 302693441 by hergp on Wednesday 29th of August 2012 08:23:48 AM
Old 08-29-2012
Probably the iptables firewall. You have to add a rule for port 5433 (port 22 is open in the default configuration).

First have a look at the file /etc/sysconfig/iptables
Code:
# Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall
# Manual customization of this file is not recommended.
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
-A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 19102 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
-A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
COMMIT

Now find a nice spot somewhere in between the existing accept rules

Code:
# Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall
# Manual customization of this file is not recommended.
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
-A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 5433 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 19102 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
-A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
COMMIT

Save your changes and restart the firewall:

Code:
service iptables restart

This User Gave Thanks to hergp For This Post:
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. IP Networking

block telnet to specific port

Hello All I am running redhat linux 7.2 and would like to know how i can block telnetting to a specified port . say for example i would like to block telnet acesses to port 80. regards Xiamin (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: xiamin
5 Replies

2. Solaris

disabled telnet now need port 23 or port 22

we disabled telnet on solaris 9 via previous a thread. We use CMS (call management system) supervisor which used port 23 (telnet). We cannot use telnet via local directive and it was shut down as stated when we shut down telnet in the inetd file. I cannot now log into the CMS box since port 23 is... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: panzerkw
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

telnet on specific port??

Hi all, I have a problem. I have machine names and their IP addresses in /etc/hosts file. My application does telnet on that machine host name. The application does not uses IP address for tenet. It will fetch the host name from /etc/hosts file. Now the telnet server runs on customized port.... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: zing_foru
6 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Telnet IP and Port Script

Hi, I would like to create a simple script that will telnet a number of IP and Ports one after the other to confirm connectivity to those addresses. I don't need to log on, just output to a file what the response is, i.e Escape Character, connectivity refused etc. Complete newbie to... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: asou
6 Replies

5. AIX

Telnet to port

can some one help me ? what happens when we telnet to a port ? example telnet 192.168.0.xx 1234 where 1234 is a port number Thank you (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: anwesh
5 Replies

6. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

Telnet to a serial port

Hello all. I have an old computer with M$-DOS 7. I want to use it like a dumb terminal, with telnet. I need to connect it to my desktop These are my questions: How can i configure the serial port on dos? How can i telnet form dos to the serial port? How can i set up a telnet server on the... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: mghis
12 Replies

7. Cybersecurity

Can't telnet to port 25 on the host.

Hi, we have recently setup a new UNIX server with solaris 10 and I am having issue with with SMTP/sendmail. telnet localhost 25 --- works telnet hostname.domain.com 25 -- does not work. # telnet hostname.domain.com 25 Trying 10.122.1.111... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: esmgr
1 Replies

8. Red Hat

telnet port 23

My linux version is 2.6.18-194.e14 (Oracle enterprise linux). Could you please tell me how to enable telnet on the server. When I try to connect the server through another pc using telnet it is throwing error. Connecting To <ip address>...Could not open connection to the host, on port 23.... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: oradba_arun
3 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

telnet echoing 'trying ip' but no port number

Hi, Well this is probably a silly one that I should know...but I don't ! I'm telnetting to various ports from a shell script and the telnet is echoing back that it's 'trying xxx.xx.xx.xx...' but not the port number it's trying! Any help much appreciated Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Grueben
1 Replies

10. Solaris

How to find port number wwn of particular port on dual port HBA,?

please find the below o/p for your reference bash-3.00# fcinfo hba-port HBA Port WWN: 21000024ff295a34 OS Device Name: /dev/cfg/c2 Manufacturer: QLogic Corp. Model: 375-3356-02 Firmware Version: 05.03.02 FCode/BIOS Version: BIOS: 2.02; fcode: 2.01;... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: sb200
3 Replies
SHOREWALL-NESTING(5)						  [FIXME: manual]					      SHOREWALL-NESTING(5)

NAME
nesting - Shorewall Nested Zones SYNOPSIS
child-zone[:parent-zone[,parent-zone]...] DESCRIPTION
In shorewall-zones[1](5), a zone may be declared to be a sub-zone of one or more other zones using the above syntax. The child-zone may be neither the firewall zone nor a vserver zone. The firewall zone may not appear as a parent zone, although all vserver zones are handled as sub-zones of the firewall zone. Where zones are nested, the CONTINUE policy in shorewall-policy[2](5) allows hosts that are within multiple zones to be managed under the rules of all of these zones. EXAMPLE
/etc/shorewall/zones: #ZONE TYPE OPTION fw firewall net ipv4 sam:net ipv4 loc ipv4 /etc/shorewall/interfaces: #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS - eth0 detect dhcp,norfc1918 loc eth1 detect /etc/shorewall/hosts: #ZONE HOST(S) OPTIONS net eth0:0.0.0.0/0 sam eth0:206.191.149.197 /etc/shorewall/policy: #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL loc net ACCEPT sam all CONTINUE net all DROP info all all REJECT info The second entry above says that when Sam is the client, connection requests should first be processed under rules where the source zone is sam and if there is no match then the connection request should be treated under rules where the source zone is net. It is important that this policy be listed BEFORE the next policy (net to all). You can have this policy generated for you automatically by using the IMPLICIT_CONTINUE option in shorewall.conf[3](5). Partial /etc/shorewall/rules: #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST PORT(S) ... DNAT sam loc:192.168.1.3 tcp ssh DNAT net loc:192.168.1.5 tcp www ... Given these two rules, Sam can connect to the firewall's internet interface with ssh and the connection request will be forwarded to 192.168.1.3. Like all hosts in the net zone, Sam can connect to the firewall's internet interface on TCP port 80 and the connection request will be forwarded to 192.168.1.5. The order of the rules is not significant. Sometimes it is necessary to suppress port forwarding for a sub-zone. For example, suppose that all hosts can SSH to the firewall and be forwarded to 192.168.1.5 EXCEPT Sam. When Sam connects to the firewall's external IP, he should be connected to the firewall itself. Because of the way that Netfilter is constructed, this requires two rules as follows: #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST PORT(S) ... ACCEPT+ sam $FW tcp ssh DNAT net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp ssh ... The first rule allows Sam SSH access to the firewall. The second rule says that any clients from the net zone with the exception of those in the "sam" zone should have their connection port forwarded to 192.168.1.3. If you need to exclude more than one zone, simply use multiple ACCEPT+ rules. This technique also may be used when the ACTION is REDIRECT. Care must be taken when nesting occurs as a result of the use of wildcard interfaces (interface names ends in '+'). Here's an example. /etc/shorewall/zones: /etc/shorewall/interfaces: #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS net ppp0 loc eth1 loc ppp+ dmz eth2 Because the net zone is declared before the loc zone, net is an implicit sub-zone of loc and in the absence of a net->... CONTINUE policy, traffic from the net zone will not be passed through loc->... rules. But DNAT and REDIRECT rules are an exception! o DNAT and REDIRECT rules generate two Netfilter rules: a 'nat' table rule that rewrites the destination IP address and/or port number, and a 'filter' table rule that ACCEPTs the rewritten connection. o Policies only affect the 'filter' table. As a consequence, the following rules will have unexpected behavior: #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST # PORT(S) ACCEPT net dmz tcp 80 REDIRECT loc 3128 tcp 80 The second rule is intended to redirect local web requests to a proxy running on the firewall and listening on TCP port 3128. But the 'nat' part of that rule will cause all connection requests for TCP port 80 arriving on interface ppp+ (including ppp0!) to have their destination port rewritten to 3128. Hence, the web server running in the DMZ will be inaccessible from the web. The above problem can be corrected in several ways. The preferred way is to use the ifname pppd option to change the 'net' interface to something other than ppp0. That way, it won't match ppp+. If you are running Shorewall version 4.1.4 or later, a second way is to simply make the nested zones explicit: #ZONE TYPE OPTION fw firewall loc ipv4 net:loc ipv4 dmz ipv4 If you take this approach, be sure to set IMPLICIT_CONTINUE=No in shorewall.conf. When using other Shorewall versions, another way is to rewrite the DNAT rule (assume that the local zone is entirely within 192.168.2.0/23): #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST # PORT(S) ACCEPT net dmz tcp 80 REDIRECT loc:192.168.2.0/23 3128 tcp 80 Another way is to restrict the definition of the loc zone: /etc/shorewall/interfaces: #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS net ppp0 loc eth1 - ppp+ dmz eth2 /etc/shorewall/hosts: #ZONE HOST(S) OPTIONS loc ppp+:192.168.2.0/23 FILES
/etc/shorewall/zones /etc/shorewall/interfaces /etc/shorewall/hosts /etc/shorewall/policy /etc/shorewall/rules SEE ALSO
shorewall(8), shorewall-accounting(5), shorewall-actions(5), shorewall-blacklist(5), shorewall-hosts(5), shorewall_interfaces(5), shorewall-ipsets(5), shorewall-maclist(5), shorewall-masq(5), shorewall-nat(5), shorewall-netmap(5), shorewall-params(5), shorewall-policy(5), shorewall-providers(5), shorewall-proxyarp(5), shorewall-rtrules(5), shorewall-routestopped(5), shorewall-rules(5), shorewall.conf(5), shorewall-secmarks(5), shorewall-tcclasses(5), shorewall-tcdevices(5), shorewall-tcrules(5), shorewall-tos(5), shorewall-tunnels(5), shorewall-zones(5) NOTES
1. shorewall-zones http://www.shorewall.net/manpages/shorewall-zones.html 2. shorewall-policy http://www.shorewall.net/manpages/shorewall-policy.html 3. shorewall.conf http://www.shorewall.net/manpages/shorewall.conf.html [FIXME: source] 06/28/2012 SHOREWALL-NESTING(5)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy