Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Making a faster alternative to a slow awk command Post 302666463 by Corona688 on Wednesday 4th of July 2012 11:23:34 AM
Old 07-04-2012
The problem, really, is that you have a huge amount of data, not a slow program. How big are your records, really?

I haven't heard perl suggested to increase speed before. I don't think using an awk regex instead of a simple = is going to make it faster, either...

The egrep solution might be worth a shot.
This User Gave Thanks to Corona688 For This Post:
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Which is faster AWK or CUT

If I just wanted to get andred08 from the following ldap dn would I be best to use AWK or CUT? uid=andred08,ou=People,o=example,dc=com It doesn't make a difference if it's just one ldap search I am getting it from but when there's a couple of hundred people in the group that retruns all... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: dopple
10 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Making things run faster

I am processing some terabytes of information on a computer having 8 processors (each with 4 cores) with a 16GB RAM and 5TB hard drive implemented as a RAID. The processing doesn't seem to be blazingly fast perhaps because of the IO limitation. I am basically running a perl script to read some... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: Legend986
13 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Which command will be faster? y?

i)wc -c/etc/passwd|awk'{print $1}' ii)ls -al/etc/passwd|awk'{print $5}' (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: karthi_g
4 Replies

4. UNIX and Linux Applications

Alternative for slow SQL subquery

Hi -- I have the following SQL query in my UNIX shell script -- but the subquery in the second section is very slow. I know there must be a way to do this with a union or something which would be better. Can anyone offer an alternative to this query? Thanks. select count(*) from ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: whoknows
2 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Multi thread awk command for faster performance

Hi, I have a script below for extracting xml from a file. for i in *.txt do echo $i awk '/<.*/ , /.*<\/.*>/' "$i" | tr -d '\n' echo -ne '\n' done . I read about using multi threading to speed up the script. I do not know much about it but read it on this forum. Is it a... (21 Replies)
Discussion started by: chetan.c
21 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Making script run faster

Can someone help me edit the below script to make it run faster? Shell: bash OS: Linux Red Hat The point of the script is to grab entire chunks of information that concerns the service "MEMORY_CHECK". For each chunk, the beginning starts with "service {", and ends with "}". I should... (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: SkySmart
15 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Faster way to use this awk command

awk "/May 23, 2012 /,0" /var/tmp/datafile the above command pulls out information in the datafile. the information it pulls is from the date specified to the end of the file. now, how can i make this faster if the datafile is huge? even if it wasn't huge, i feel there's a better/faster way to... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: SkySmart
8 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to make awk command faster?

I have the below command which is referring a large file and it is taking 3 hours to run. Can something be done to make this command faster. awk -F ',' '{OFS=","}{ if ($13 == "9999") print $1,$2,$3,$4,$5,$6,$7,$8,$9,$10,$11,$12 }' ${NLAP_TEMP}/hist1.out|sort -T ${NLAP_TEMP} |uniq>... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: Peu Mukherjee
13 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to make awk command faster for large amount of data?

I have nginx web server logs with all requests that were made and I'm filtering them by date and time. Each line has the following structure: 127.0.0.1 - xyz.com GET 123.ts HTTP/1.1 (200) 0.000 s 3182 CoreMedia/1.0.0.15F79 (iPhone; U; CPU OS 11_4 like Mac OS X; pt_br) These text files are... (21 Replies)
Discussion started by: brenoasrm
21 Replies
funidx(7)							SAORD Documentation							 funidx(7)

NAME
Funidx - Using Indexes to Filter Rows in a Table SYNOPSIS
This document contains a summary of the user interface for filtering rows in binary tables with indexes. DESCRIPTION
Funtools Table Filtering allows rows in a table to be selected based on the values of one or more columns in the row. Because the actual filter code is compiled on the fly, it is very efficient. However, for very large files (hundreds of Mb or larger), evaluating the filter expression on each row can take a long time. Therefore, funtools supports index files for columns, which are used automatically during fil- tering to reduce dramatically the number of row evaluations performed. The speed increase for indexed filtering can be an order of magni- tude or more, depending on the size of the file. The funindex program creates an index on one or more columns in a binary table. For example, to create an index for the column pi in the file huge.fits, use: funindex huge.fits pi This will create an index named huge_pi.idx. When a filter expression is initialized for row evaluation, funtools looks for an index file for each column in the filter expression. If found, and if the file modification date of the index file is later than that of the data file, then the index will be used to reduce the number of rows that are evaluated in the filter. When Spatial Region Filtering is part of the expression, the columns associated with the region are checked for index files. If an index file is not available for a given column, then in general, all rows must be checked when that column is part of a filter expression. This is not true, however, when a non-indexed column is part of an AND expression. In this case, only the rows that pass the other part of the AND expression need to be checked. Thus, in some cases, filtering speed can increase significantly even if all columns are not indexed. Also note that certain types of filter expression syntax cannot make use of indices. For example, calling functions with column names as arguments implies that all rows must be checked against the function value. Once again, however, if this function is part of an AND expres- sion, then a significant improvement in speed still is possible if the other part of the AND expression is indexed. For example, note below the dramatic speedup in searching a 1 Gb file using an AND filter, even when one of the columns (pha) has no index: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 42.36u 13.07s 6:42.89 13.7% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: [INDEF] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxand(1): INDEF [IDX_OR_SORT] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 1.55u 0.37s 1:19.80 2.4% When all columns are indexed, the increase in speed can be even more dramatic: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 42.60u 12.63s 7:28.63 12.3% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: pi start=9473025,stop=9492240 => pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxor sort/merge: pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] [IDX_OR_SORT] idxmerge(5): [IDX_OR_SORT] pi[ROW] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 1.67u 0.30s 0:24.76 7.9% The miracle of indexed filtering (and indeed, of any indexing) is the speed of the binary search on the index, which is of order log2(n) instead of n. (The funtools binary search method is taken from http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/03/22/Binary, to whom grateful acknowledgement is made.) This means that the larger the file, the better the performance. Conversely, it also means that for small files, using an index (and the overhead involved) can slow filtering down somewhat. Our tests indicate that on a file containing a few tens of thousands of rows, indexed filtering can be 10 to 20 percent slower than non-indexed filtering. Of course, your mileage will vary with con- ditions (disk access speed, amount of available memory, process load, etc.) Any problem encountered during index processing will result in indexing being turned off, and replaced by filtering all rows. You can turn filtering off manually by setting the idx_activate variable to 0 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_ACTIVATE environment variable to 0 (in the global environment). Debugging output showing how the indexes are being processed can be displayed to stderr by setting the idx_debug variable to 1 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_DEBUG environment variable to 1 (in the global environment). Currently, indexed filtering only works with FITS binary tables and raw event files. It does not work with text files. This restriction might be removed in a future release. SEE ALSO
See funtools(7) for a list of Funtools help pages version 1.4.2 January 2, 2008 funidx(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy