Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Why is C/C++ considered low-level languages??? Post 302649591 by jlliagre on Thursday 31st of May 2012 06:18:18 PM
Old 05-31-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabam
I have always been hearing that C/C++ are relatively low-level as compared to Java/C# etc. Could you please tell me some low-level qualities of C/C++?
I wouldn't put C and C++ in the same bag.

C is undoubtedly lower level than Java/C# in the sense in can do a lot - but not all - what can do the real low level programming languages which are assembly languages. Also, you can write C code that doesn't depend on a runtime/library, even the standard C library, with C. That's why the vast majority of operating systems kernels are written in C.

C++ is a different story. It is kind of a superset of C however, if you use C++ specific features, you are adding dependencies that make your code much higher level and runtime dependent. That would make for example C++ quite a poor choice for writing a kernel.
Quote:
And I think disk deframenters are written in C/C++, please correct me if I am wrong.
You are probably correct but a disk defragmenter is not that much an example of code requiring a "low level" programming language. You certainly can write a disk defragmenter in Java, or python or whatever.
 

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Low level format?

I want to do a low level format like in windows (C:\format c:) but I don't know how it works in unix or linux.. Can somebody help me ? thnx :) (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: day
3 Replies

2. What is on Your Mind?

Programming languages polyglots: how many languages you know?

Post what languages (including scripting) you know, why and where you think that language is most usable. Also include libraries in which you're really good at (libusb, gtk, qt, etc). assembly? C or C++? perl or python? pascal? bash or csh/tcsh? opengl? gtk or qt? mono? (27 Replies)
Discussion started by: redoubtable
27 Replies

3. Programming

write() issue during a low level hdd access

Hi, I am trying to write zeroes to the hdd using a c program. I don't want to use the dd or ddrescue or any such inbuilt program because of reasons like real time progress, writing custom patterns. (my program is more like an erasure application, but does only zero fill). here are the steps... (35 Replies)
Discussion started by: sponnusa
35 Replies

4. IP Networking

Best reference for understanding low level info on nic cards drivers and functionality

Hi, What is the best reference that gives in detail on nic cards configuration , assigning multiple ip addresses to a single interface, netlink library etc and all basic stuff at this level..? Thanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Gopi Krishna P
2 Replies

5. AIX

High Runqueue (R) LOW CPU LOW I/O Low Network Low memory usage

Hello All I have a system running AIX 61 shared uncapped partition (with 11 physical processors, 24 Virtual 72GB of Memory) . The output from NMON, vmstat show a high run queue (60+) for continous periods of time intervals, but NO paging, relatively low I/o (6000) , CPU % is 40, Low network.... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: IL-Malti
9 Replies

6. Programming

System calls and C language low-level qualities???

Hi friends, I hope everyone is fine and doing well. I queried in my previous thread about the low-level qualities of C/C++ languages.I really thank you people for explaining, it was really helpful. One more ambiquity that I have in my mind is regarding the unix system calls like open, creat,... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gabam
1 Replies

7. Programming

Low level X11 programming

How to use X11 without Xlib not XCB? How draw window directly on low level? I must use anyway window manager like Motif? I have ridden that X11 has server-client architecture, client send via TCP/IP to port 6000 request for primitives and get replies. Where is detailed description of it? In X11... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: AndrzejB
0 Replies
C(7)						       BSD Miscellaneous Information Manual						      C(7)

NAME
c, c78, c89, c90, c99 -- The C programming language DESCRIPTION
C is a general purpose programming language, which has a strong connection with the UNIX operating system and its derivatives, since the vast majority of those systems were written in the C language. The C language contains some basic ideas from the BCPL language through the B lan- guage written by Ken Thompson in 1970 for the DEC PDP-7 machines. The development of the UNIX operating system was started on a PDP-7 machine in assembly language, but it made very difficult to port the existing code to other systems. In 1972 Dennis M. Ritchie worked out the C programming language for further development of the UNIX operating system. The idea was to imple- ment only the C compiler for different platforms, and implement most part of the operating system in the new programming language to simplify the portability between different architectures. It follows that C is very eligible for (but not limited to) writing operating systems and low-level applications. The C language did not have a specification or standardized version for a long time. It went through a lot of changes and improvements for ages. In 1978, Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie published the first book about C under the title "The C Programming Language". We can think of this book as the first specification of the language. This version is often referred as K&R C after the names of the authors. Sometimes it is referred as C78, as well, after the publishing year of the first edition of the book. It is important to notice, that the instruction set of the language is limited to the most fundamental elements for simplicity. Handling of the standard I/O and such common functions are implemented in the libraries shipped with the compiler. As these functions are also widely used, it was demanded to include into the description what requisites the library should conform to, not just strictly the language itself. Accordingly, the aforementioned standards cover the library elements, as well. The elements of this standard library is still not enough for more complicated tasks. In this case the provided system calls of the given operating system can be used. To not lose the portability by using these system calls, the POSIX (Portable Operating System Interface) standard evolved. It describes what functions should be available to keep portability. Note, that POSIX is not a C standard, but an operating system standard and thus is beyond the scope of this manual. The standards discussed below are all C standards and only cover the C programming language and the accompanying library. After the publication of the book mentioned before, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) started to work on standardizing the language, and they announced ANSI X3.159-1989 in 1989. It is usually referred as ANSI C or C89. The main difference in this standard were the function prototypes, which is a new way of declaring functions. With the old-style function declarations, the compiler was unable to check the sanity of the actual parameters at a function call. The old syntax was highly error-prone because incompatible parameters were hard to detect in the program code and the problem only showed up at run-time. In 1990, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) adopted the ANSI standard as ISO/IEC 9899:1990 in 1990. This is also referred as ISO C or C90. It only contains negligible minor modifications against ANSI C, so the two standards often considered to be fully equivalent. This was a very important milestone in the history of the C language, but the development of the language did not stop. The ISO C standard was later extended with an amendment as ISO/IEC 9899 AM1 in 1995. This contained, for example, the wide-character support in wchar.h and wctype.h. Two corrigenda were also published: Technical Corrigendum 1 as ISO/IEC 9899 TCOR1 in 1995 and Technical Corrigendum 2 as ISO/IEC 9899 TCOR1 in 1996. The continuous development and growth made it necessary to work out a new standard, which contains the new features and fixes the known defects and deficiencies of the language. As a result, ISO/IEC 9899:1999 was born in 1999. Similarly to the other standards, this is referred after the publication year as C99. The improvements include the following: o Inline functions o Support for variable length arrays o New high-precision integer type named long long int, and other integer types defined in stdint.h o New boolean data type implemented in stdbool.h o One line comments taken from the C++ language o Some new preprocessor features o New variables can be declared anywhere, not just in the beginning of the program or program blocks o No implicit int type Since then new standards have not been published, but the C language is still evolving. New and useful features have been showed up in the most famous C compiler: GNU C. Most of the UNIX-like operating systems use GNU C as a system compiler, but those addition in GNU C should not be considered as standard features. SEE ALSO
c89(1), c99(1), cc(1) STANDARDS
ANSI, X3.159-1989. ISO/IEC, 9899:1990, Programming languages -- C. ISO/IEC, 9899 AM1. ISO/IEC, 9899 TCOR1, Programming languages -- C, Technical Corrigendum 1. ISO/IEC, 9899 TCOR2, Programming languages -- C, Technical Corrigendum 2. ISO/IEC, 9899:1999, Programming languages -- C. HISTORY
This manual page first appeared in FreeBSD 9.0. AUTHORS
This manual page was originally written by Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>. BSD
May 30, 2011 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy