05-23-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
magdal
Hello
both vPars and IVM will satisfy all requirements.
Now that vPars v.6.0 is moving out of FW world and is implemented as a SW layer the two solutions are closer.
What you ask however is satisfied by both ... These and many more [multipathing on host level,SAN attached tape device access -no one else does that -, Advanced IO etc]
Regards
Christos Magdalinos
Thank you Christos! Would you recommend one method over the other?
8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi,
My script needs to find out if it is running on a virtual machine.
If it is then it needs to find out.
1 . The number of virtual processors.
2 . Actual physical box onto which the virtual machine is hosted.
3 .Processors on the physical machine.
Actually there are some commands like... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: prasi_in
1 Replies
2. Red Hat
Hi Friends,
Is there any one who is working on Redhat Virtualization (RHEV -- KVM)?
Regards,
Arumon (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: arumon
4 Replies
3. Virtualization and Cloud Computing
Hi everyone.
Last week we have some hardware problems in our Unixware 7 server, and i decided to change this physical machine into a virtual machine.
The scenario is:
architecture=IA32
bus_types=PCI2.10,ISA,PnP1.0
hostname=tecsup2uw.tecsupaqp.edu
hw_provider=Generic AT... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: danilosevilla
1 Replies
4. Ubuntu
Hello Everyone,
First of all, I highly appreciate all Linux forum members and whole Linux community. http://forums.linuxmint.com/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif. I wish you the best for all of you !
I will try to be short and concise: I am using Linux Mint 10 for 2 months on 2 ws, and all went... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: cdt
3 Replies
5. Solaris
Hi everyone,
I have ten servers with solaris (diffrent versions).
there is solaris 10, solaris 6 and solaris 8.
some are SPARC and some are x86
I would like to move them to one server so they all will be virtual.
Is it possible? how? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bregtux
4 Replies
6. Linux
Hello admins and gurus
I have a controversial topic: now we are investing in a new Linux OS that will hold our Sybase database. The server will virtualized on a VMware server hosted on SAN storage. Now the question is, when we install the database engine is it better - in terms of performance -... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: abohmeed
1 Replies
7. Virtualization and Cloud Computing
Got tired of messing around with real hardware old and others..
Decided to spend some $$ for a QUAD-core dual cpu laptop with 8 gig of ram and 1 TB disk space..
running VMware workstation 10 on windows 8.0 , with a pair of solx86 vcs 5.1 cluster and a pair of rhel 6.4 vcs 6.x cluster..
... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: ppchu99
0 Replies
8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hello All,
To start with, I am not an expert of solaris and VMs. Unfortunately, I can't find a direct or understandable (at least to me) answer to my question online. So please, excuse me if my question will sound dumb to you. :o
We have 2 remaining solaris 8 servers are on sparc... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: forextrafun
9 Replies
LEARN ABOUT HPUX
st_san_safe
st_san_safe(5) OBSOLETED st_san_safe(5)
NAME
st_san_safe - determine whether access to tape device special files without the no-rewind-on-close option is allowed (OBSOLETED)
VALUES
Failsafe
Default
Allowed values
Recommended values
or
DESCRIPTION
Note: this tunable is obsoleted and has been renamed to beginning with release HP-UX 11i v3.
This tunable notifies the tape driver whether it should allow access to device special files without the no-rewind-on-close option. When
this tunable is on the tape driver will fail any open on a tape device special file without the no-rewind-on-close option (that is, or with
a status of
The tunable allows the safe sharing of tape devices in SAN tape backup solution configurations. The disabling of device special files
without no-rewind-on-close in a SAN tape backup solution configuration prevents the accidental sending of a rewind command on close from
HP-UX systems via standard tape commands like which would corrupt a backup in process.
Who Is Expected to Change This Tunable?
Anyone.
Restrictions on Changing
Changes to this tunable take effect immediately.
When Should the Tunable Be Turned On?
This tunable should be turned on if the system is going to be used in a SAN tape backup solution configuration.
What Are the Side Effects of Turning the Tunable On?
The tape driver will fail any open to a tape device special file that does not have the no-rewind-on-close option with a status of This
behavior prevents the usage of any tape device special file without the no-rewind-on-close option.
When Should the Tunable Be Turned Off?
This tunable should be turned off if the system is not part of a SAN tape backup solution configuration or the system utilizes will not
function unless it has access to device special files without the no-rewind-on-close option.
What Are the Side Effects of Turning the Tunable Off?
A rewind may be issued from this system accidentally on close possibly corrupting a backup being issued from another system on the SAN.
What Other Tunables Should Be Changed at the Same Time?
None.
WARNINGS
All HP-UX kernel tunable parameters are release specific. This parameter may be removed or have its meaning changed in future releases of
HP-UX.
Installation of optional kernel software, from HP or other vendors, may cause changes to tunable parameter values. After installation,
some tunable parameters may no longer be at the default or recommended values. For information about the effects of installation on tun-
able values, consult the documentation for the kernel software being installed. For information about optional kernel software that was
factory installed on your system, see at
AUTHOR
was developed by Hewlett-Packard.
SEE ALSO
norewind_close_disabled(5), scsi_tape(7), scsimgr_estape(7).
Tunable Kernel Parameters st_san_safe(5)