Sponsored Content
Operating Systems AIX Power6 vs. Power7 hardware performance Post 302643243 by zxmaus on Friday 18th of May 2012 09:35:02 PM
Old 05-18-2012
hmmm

having more than 300 lpars - about 130 migrated from p6 to p7 I cannot see where p7 is even remotely slower than p6? - So I go with Bakunin's opinion. There are plenty of other reasons than cpu clockspeed that could cause your performance degregation.
In my experience, oracle performs much better on p7 (benefiting from the again out-of-order processing) and for sybase it's about the same if you stick with one virtual per engine.
Anyways to be able to help you I would suggest that you simply post some data from your system under load - like
Code:
vmstat -Iwt 2 10, vmstat -s, vmstat -v, iostat -Dl 2 10

and alikes ?
It would help as well if you could tell us anything about the amount of virtualization, if AIXTHREAD_SCOPE is set to S, which OS version and TL / ML you are running and similar things.
If your app really performs a lot better on p6 than on p7 in a different version, than I would probably see if there are issues with the code of your application connecting to the DB. When we were upgrading from sybase 12.5.4 to 15, we had lots of performance degregation because the entire behaviour of the DB was changing and our developers did not bother to amend the stored procedures to the new DB version.
What we are seeing as well when migrating to p7 is a lot more locking in our DBs, which makes the DB appear to be slower though it isn't. It just seems to be because the queries have not yet been cleaned up.
Last but not least - how did the data come onto your new box. If it has been replicated via tools like rman or repserver or goldengate - or even if it simply has been sftp'ed in multiple streams into the new filesystems - than you might just badly suffer under fragmentation within the filesystems - what would be very easy to diagnose via fileplace commands.

Regards
zxmaus
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. AIX

Oracle 10G best practices on Power6 AIX5.3

Can anyone point me to any best practices for partitioning, resource prerequisites, and implementation of Oracle 10G release 2 with RAC on 2 power6 550's running AIX5.3 as a cluster? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: JodyTek
1 Replies

2. AIX

POWER6 VIO Failover

Hello, Can someone point to me document or the method to make failover for VIO Servers ? I have one VIO_Server1 which has 4 AIX LPARS - From the VIO_SERVER1 I have assigned virtual SCSI DISK to the four LPARS - For Ethernet I have used LHEA So, if my VIO Server1 crashes all the LPARS... (17 Replies)
Discussion started by: filosophizer
17 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Processor performance question [hardware]

A few of our machines need upgrading and we are looking into a selection of processors at present. There are suggestions on the vendor's websites that the L3 cache was specifically introduced for gamers. Is this true? Does having L1, L2 and/or L3 cache help at all in performance or are the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: figaro
0 Replies

4. Programming

Top v3.7 and v3.8beta1 will not compile on Power7/AIX6.1 server.

Please help! We are upgrading our server to a new Power7/AIX6.1 from Power5/AIX5.3. I have some programs that rely on output of the TOP command to do various things, however, I keep getting an error when I try to re-compile TOP on my new server (see below). I have tried TOP 3.7 (current... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: troym72
1 Replies

5. AIX

IBM POWER7 595

Does anybody know when POWER7 595 is going to be announced??? I was looking for in IBM's web page but could not find (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Vit0_Corleone
1 Replies

6. AIX

Migration DB2 V8 databases to Power7 server

hi Guys, I just wondering if someone has gone through this process before. We are about to migrate all our current LPARS from a Power6 server to a new Power7 server. The only concern we have is that we are runing a few DB2 V8 databases on AIX 5.3 and basically DB2 v8 is been out of support for... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: arizah
2 Replies

7. AIX

Server Power7 p750 support CentOS or not ?

Hi All, I would like to install CentOS 5.5 linux on Power7 server (P750). it support or not?? I found information from IBM websites as detail below, but not sure for CentOS. IBM Power 750 support linux >>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP3,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: arm_naja
2 Replies

8. AIX

How to get power6 power FRU?

how to get power6 power FRU? the power5 can get by this command: lscfg -vp | grep -p 'AC PS' | grep FRU however, the power6 machine cannot get any info for that command. thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rainbow_bean
1 Replies

9. AIX

Hard drive compatibility for POWER6 p520

Hi, I have recently inherited an old p520 from work running AIX 6.1, based on the POWER6 CPU. I'm planning to play around with it and use it to learn the system, so this is a purely personal project. The machine is not under a support contract any more. I am looking to replace one of the disks... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: topcat
11 Replies
X86_ENERGY_PERF_POLICY(8)				      System Manager's Manual					 X86_ENERGY_PERF_POLICY(8)

NAME
x86_energy_perf_policy - read or write MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS SYNOPSIS
x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] -r x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] 'performance' x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] 'normal' x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] 'powersave' x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] n DESCRIPTION
x86_energy_perf_policy allows software to convey its policy for the relative importance of performance versus energy savings to the proces- sor. The processor uses this information in model-specific ways when it must select trade-offs between performance and energy efficiency. This policy hint does not supersede Processor Performance states (P-states) or CPU Idle power states (C-states), but allows software to have influence where it would otherwise be unable to express a preference. For example, this setting may tell the hardware how aggressively or conservatively to control frequency in the "turbo range" above the explicitly OS-controlled P-state frequency range. It may also tell the hardware how aggressively is should enter the OS requested C- states. Support for this feature is indicated by CPUID.06H.ECX.bit3 per the Intel Architectures Software Developer's Manual. Options -c limits operation to a single CPU. The default is to operate on all CPUs. Note that MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS is defined per logical processor, but that the initial implementations of the MSR were shared among all processors in each package. -v increases verbosity. By default x86_energy_perf_policy is silent. -r is for "read-only" mode - the unchanged state is read and displayed. performance Set a policy where performance is paramount. The processor will be unwilling to sacrifice any performance for the sake of energy saving. This is the hardware default. normal Set a policy with a normal balance between performance and energy efficiency. The processor will tolerate minor performance compro- mise for potentially significant energy savings. This reasonable default for most desktops and servers. powersave Set a policy where the processor can accept a measurable performance hit to maximize energy efficiency. n Set MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS to the specified number. The range of valid numbers is 0-15, where 0 is maximum performance and 15 is max- imum energy efficiency. NOTES
x86_energy_perf_policy runs only as root. FILES
/dev/cpu/*/msr SEE ALSO
msr(4) AUTHORS
Written by Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> X86_ENERGY_PERF_POLICY(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy