One wonders why the default file permissions should be RWX for all users. If you really want this, then you may be better defining an alias in your shell such that it edits the files then set the permissions. Something like:-
... might suffice.
It does leave you very open to abuse though. Perhaps you would be better to consider granting access on a need basis rather than just the grant-to-all you are suggesting.
I hope that this helps,
Robin
Liverpool/Blackburn
UK
in this unix book that i have, it says:
the statement:
filedes = open(pathname, O_CREAT, mode);
is actually
filedes = open(pathname, O_CREAT, (~mask)&mode); /* ~ is the negation symbol */
like it's doing some type of masking.
for example,
fd =... (1 Reply)
I changed the umask in /etc/security/user to 027.
I changed the umask in /etc/profile to 027.
My current shell is ksh.
My .profile doesn't make any changes to umask or call other scripts that change umask.
Running AIX 5.3
I still get a umask of 022 instead of the expected 027. I have no... (1 Reply)
hai guys ,
i am having problem in getting the knowledge about umask.
actually when i am putting command as umask some value is coming like 0022 by defalut.
we can change its value also.
but the main thing is thye file permisiion actually depends upon umask.how is it depends upon umask i want to... (6 Replies)
Hi,
I have a doubt on the umask values.
Why is the UMASK value is different from file and directory?
Suppose if the umask value is 0022. The file permissions for a newly created file is 644 and the file permissions for a newly created directory is 755.
My doubt is why can't it be the... (1 Reply)
Due to urgent requirement to resolve some permission issues , I wish
to set solaris 8 server so that any file written is on 777 .
I guess need to set umask , how to set it ?? (7 Replies)
I need to set a umask of 022 for my ssh sessions, or within my profile.
I have set the umask in both bash_profile and bashrc.
and when i run umask i get 0022 but when i create a file i get,
# touch test.txt
# ls -l test.txt
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 26 12:25 test.txt
it seems like... (1 Reply)
Hi,
Please, let me know how the umask is working? As per my understanding is aprt from subtracting from 666/777, logical gate operation is performing.
Ex: If I set uname 011, it gave the permission like 666 for file. Request you to explain which gate's operation performed.
$uname 011... (4 Replies)
Hi guys,
I want all new files and directories created, or copy file give this permisson "rwxrwx---", with chmod i do this with octal value "770". If i execute "umask 770" the permissons is not the same with new or copy file. How can i configure this command? I do not understand the "man... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Xedrox
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
sbuild-adduser
SBUILD-ADDUSER(8) Debian sbuild SBUILD-ADDUSER(8)NAME
sbuild-adduser - add an sbuild user
SYNOPSIS
sbuild-adduser [-h|--help | -V|--version] USER1 [USER2 [USERn...]]
DESCRIPTION
sbuild-adduser adds the specified users to the sbuild group, granting them the privelege to build packages with sbuild(1). The schroot(1)
configuration must permit the user to obtain root permissions in the chroot via the root-users and root-groups options in schroot.conf,
because this is required to install and remove build-dependencies inside the chroot. This is normally done using the sbuild group, but
additional users or groups may be added in order to grant finer-grained permissions, for example to restrict individual users to particular
chroots.
OPTIONS
Actions
-h, --help
Display this manual.
-V, --version
Print version information.
User selection
USER The user to be granted sbuild access.
EXAMPLES
To allow user rleigh sbuild access:
% sudo sbuild-adduser rleigh
AUTHORS
Roger Leigh.
COPYRIGHT
Copyright (C) 2006-2008 Roger Leigh <rleigh@debian.org>.
SEE ALSO sbuild(1), sbuild-setup(7), schroot.conf(5).
Version 0.63.2 18 Aug 2012 SBUILD-ADDUSER(8)